Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/971,216

Bicycle wire-holding seat and a headset thereof

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 06, 2024
Priority
Dec 11, 2023 — TW 112148132
Examiner
ARCE, MARLON ALEXANDER
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Glory Wheel Enterprise Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1078 granted / 1262 resolved
+25.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1278
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
37.3%
-2.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1262 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 14 is objected to under 37 CFR 1.75(c) as being in improper form because a multiple dependent claim14 depends on claims 1 to 9. See MPEP § 608.01(n). Accordingly, the claim 14 has not been further treated on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 2 (and therefore claims 4,6,7-9) is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claim states “wherein a slit is formed in the holding ring extending”, hence, the claim fails to say which way the slit is extending. The claim will be examined as the slit extending in a vertical axis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 10-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by King (US 2022/0204118). King discloses a bicycle wire-holding seat comprising an outer ring (130) and a holding ring (140) coaxially arranged with the outer ring (see figures 4 and 5), a first inclined plane arranged on at least one part of an inner surface of the outer ring (see figure 5 as the outer ring 130 has an inclined plane that contacts the holding ring 140), a second inclined plane arranged on at least one part of an outer surface of the holding ring and abutting against the first inclined plane (see figure 5 as the holding ring 140 has an inclined plane that contacts the inclined plane of the outer ring 130), and a wiring hole (136) formed between the outer ring and the holding ring extending, wherein the wiring hole is applied for receive a wire (180) extending through the wiring hole and the holding ring is applied for holding one part of a frame (12,120) of the bicycle. Regarding claim 2, wherein a slit (142) is formed in the holding ring extending along a vertical axis. Regarding claims 3 and 4, wherein the wiring hole (136) is recessed in the inner surface of the outer ring (130). Regarding claims 5 and 6, wherein a stop portion (152) applied for preventing the holding ring from being displaced relative to the outer ring is arranged between the outer ring and the holding ring (member 152 stops the holding ring from moving once the cap 150 is assembled). Regarding claim 10, King discloses a bicycle headset (see figure 3), comprising: a bicycle wire-holding seat (see figures 3-5), comprising an outer ring (130) and a holding ring (140) coaxially arranged with the outer ring, a first inclined plane arranged on the at least one part of an inner surface of the outer ring (see figure 5 as the outer ring 130 has an inclined plane that contacts the holding ring 140), a second inclined plane arranged on the at least one part of the outer surface of the holding ring and abutting against the first inclined plane (see figure 5 as the holding ring 140 has an inclined plane that contacts the inclined plane of the outer ring 130), and a wiring hole (136) formed between the outer ring and the holding ring; and a bearing (114,116) arranged coaxially with the bicycle wire-holding seat and comprising a first ring and a second ring rotatable relative to the first ring (as bearings have an inner and outer ring with bearing balls in between them), the outer ring (130) can be rotated with the first ring or the second ring (in King the outer ring spins with the outer ring of the bearing, see figures 4 and 5). Regarding claim 11, wherein an annular groove (134) is recessed in the surface of the outer ring opposite to the holding ring (see figures 4 and 5), the annular groove is applied for combine with the first ring of the bearing (see figure 5). Regarding claims 12 to 14, wherein the wiring hole (136) is misaligned with the bearing (114, see figure 5). Examiners note: claim 14 was objected above, however, it was rejected with art as it states the same claimed subject matter of claims 12 and 13. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-9 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 7, the art of record did not include “the stop portion comprises a fixing rib protruding from the outer surface of the holding ring towards the outer ring, and a fixing groove recessed in the inner surface of the outer ring, and the fixing groove is applied for receive the fixing rib”. Regarding claim 8, the art of record did not include “the stop portion comprises a leaf extending radially from a surface of the ring, a position of at least one part of the leaf overlaps with the outer ring, a stopping rib protrudes from at least one part of the leaf towards the outer ring, a stopping groove is recessed in the surface of the outer ring, and the stopping groove is applied for receive the stopping rib”. Regarding claim 9, the art of record did not include “the stop portion comprises a leaf extending radially from a surface of the ring, a position of at least one part of the leaf overlaps with the outer ring, a stopping hole is formed in at least one part of the leaf, and a stopping groove is recessed in the surface of the outer ring and aligned with the stopping hole, a pin mounted through the stopping hole and the stopping groove”. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Marlon A Arce whose telephone number is (571)272-1341. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM - 4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Valentin Neacsu can be reached at 571-272-6265. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARLON A ARCE/Examiner, Art Unit 3611 /KEVIN HURLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3611
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698046
DOUBLE-TRACTION TRANSFER VEHICLE
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12686454
STACKABLE TRAILER SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHODS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686452
LOCKING MECHANISM FOR SELF-PROPELLED TANDEM AXLE TRAILER
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12673741
Drifting vehicle frame
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668087
TRAILER CAMERA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 3m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1262 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month