Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/971,239

ROTATIONAL SUCTION VALVES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 06, 2024
Priority
Dec 07, 2023 — provisional 63/607,259
Examiner
SANCHEZ-MEDINA, REINALDO
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
530 granted / 676 resolved
+8.4% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
707
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
65.5%
+25.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 676 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species Group V in the reply filed on 04/07/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 3, 5, 9, 13-14, and 19-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 04/07/2026. Claims 3, 5, and 9 are withdrawn since they are not drawn to the elected species group V. Claim 3 is drawn to species I and II since it limits the actuator to a rotatable knob or lever. Claim 5 is drawn to species IV since it limits the button to include a groove for a protrusion of the shaft. Claim 9 is drawn to species II since it limits the outer shaft to include a channel in communication with the atmosphere. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 16-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ko (Pub. No. US 2022/0361734). Regarding claim 16, Ko discloses a medical valve (Figs. 1-9), comprising: an inner shaft (300); an outer shaft (400), wherein the inner shaft (300) is concentrically received (Fig. 4) within the outer shaft (400); and an actuator (500) configured to rotate (paragraph 30) the inner shaft (300) about a longitudinal axis (Figs. 4-5) of the inner shaft (300) in order to transition the medical valve to (a) a first position (Fig. 5), in which the medical valve is configured to deliver suction to a working channel (200) of an endoscope (paragraph 30), and (b) a second position (Fig. 4), in which the medical valve inhibits delivery of suction to the working channel (200) of the endoscope (paragraph 30). Regarding claim 17, Ko discloses the medical valve (Figs. 1-9), wherein, in the second position (Fig. 4), a lumen (inner cavity of 300, Fig. 4) of the inner shaft (300) is in fluid communication with an atmosphere (paragraph 38). Regarding claim 18, Ko discloses the medical valve (Figs. 1-9), wherein the outer shaft (400) includes a cut or groove (groove enabling ridge 303 to rotate within, Figs. 4-5), and wherein the inner shaft (300) includes a protrusion (300) configured to engage (paragraph 30) the cut or the groove (Fig. 4-5). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 4, 6-8, 10-12, and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over NG (Pub. No. US 2022/0221069) in view of Ferm (U.S. Patent No. 2,606,736). Regarding claim 1, NG disclose a medical valve (Figs. 1-10), comprising: a shaft (2) including a first opening (21) on a distal end (Fig. 4) of the shaft (2) and a second opening (22) on a side surface (Fig. 4) of the shaft (2); and an actuator (111 or 114) configured to control the shaft (2) about a longitudinal axis (paragraph 34) of the shaft (2) in order to transition the medical valve to (a) a first configuration (paragraph 34), in which the second opening (22) is aligned (Fig. 8) with a port (at 6) of a valve well (paragraph 27), in order to deliver suction to a working channel of an endoscope (paragraph 27), and (b) a second configuration (paragraph 34) in which the second opening (22) is misaligned (Fig. 7) with the port (at 6) of the valve well (paragraph 27), but lacks disclosure of the actuator configured to rotate the shaft about a longitudinal axis of the shaft. Ferm teaches a valve (20) comprising an actuator button (40) connected to a inner shaft (22) that is surrounded by an outer shaft (23) within a valve well (20a), the inner shaft (22) has a pin (38) that can slide in a slot (39) of the outer shaft (23) to guide a rotation of the inner shaft (22) when the button (40) is actuated (Column 3 lines 35-50). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the actuator of NG with a pin and slot actuator as taught by Ferm since they are considered art recognized equivalents in the art of mechanical actuators that perform the same function of controlling a fluid valve based on the actuation of a push button. Regarding claim 2, NG disclose the medical valve (Figs. 1-10), wherein the actuator (111) is configured to automatically transition from the first configuration to the second configuration (paragraph 34). Regarding claim 4, NG disclose the medical valve (Figs. 1-10), wherein the actuator (111) includes a linear actuator (paragraph 34) configured to move in a direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the shaft (2). Regarding claim 6, NG disclose the medical valve (Figs. 1-10), wherein the shaft (2) is an inner shaft (Fig. 5) and wherein the medical valve further comprises an outer shaft (1) including a third opening (Fig. 5) on a distal end of the outer shaft (1) and a fourth opening (12) on a side surface (Fig. 5) of the outer shaft (1). Regarding claim 7, NG disclose the medical valve (Figs. 1-10), wherein, in the first configuration (Fig. 8), the second opening (22) of the inner shaft (2) is aligned with the fourth opening (12) of the outer shaft (1). Regarding claim 8, NG disclose the medical valve (Figs. 1-10), wherein the fourth opening (12) is aligned with the port (at 6) in the first configuration (Fig. 8) and the second configuration (Fig. 7). Regarding claim 10, Ferm (modified above) teaches wherein the outer shaft (23) includes a cut or groove (39), and wherein the inner shaft (22) includes a protrusion (38) configured to engage the cut or the groove (39). Regarding claim 11, Ferm (modified above) teaches wherein the actuator (40) is fixedly (Fig. 3) coupled to the inner shaft (22), such that linear movement of the actuator (40) causes the protrusion (38) of the inner shaft (22) to ride along the cut or the groove (39) in order to rotate the inner shaft (22) relative to the outer shaft (23). Regarding claim 12, NG disclose the medical valve (Figs. 1-10), wherein the inner shaft (2) includes a fifth opening (top opening), wherein, in the second configuration (Fig. 7), the fifth opening is proximal of a proximal-most end (Fig. 8) of the outer shaft (1) and the valve well (paragraph 27). Regarding claim 15, NG disclose the medical valve (Figs. 1-10), further comprising an aperture (13 or 14) configured to be closed in the first configuration (Fig. 10) and open in the second configuration (Fig. 9). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Suzuki (Pub. No. US 2021/0100432) disclose a medical valve, comprising an inner and outer shaft having a similar pin and slot actuation mechanism. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Reinaldo Sanchez-Medina, telephone number 571-270-5168, fax number 571-270-6168. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday (7:30AM-4:00PM EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisors can be reached by phone. Craig Schneider can be reached at 571-272-3607 or Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571-272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REINALDO SANCHEZ-MEDINA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2024
Application Filed
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638090
DOUBLE CHECK VALVE, PNEUMATIC BRAKING DEVICE, AND VEHICLE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637218
ADJUSTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM AND AIRCRAFT EQUIPPED WITH A WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12612993
GATE INSERT VALVE AND METHOD OF INSERTION INTO PRESSURIZED PIPELINES
1y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12601413
PRESSURE COMPENSATION SYSTEMS, LIQUID SUPPLY SYSTEMS AND METHODS USING THE SAME
5y 2m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584581
SPLIT TEE PLUG DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.2%)
2y 2m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 676 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month