Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/971,962

BLAST, FRAGMENT AND BATTERY FIRE MITIGATION APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 06, 2024
Priority
Dec 06, 2023 — provisional 63/606,860 +2 more
Examiner
TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Disablement Technologies And Consulting LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1080 granted / 1387 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1417
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§102
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1387 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group II (claims 8-16) in the reply filed on 5-26-26 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there is no serious search burden because all Groups (I-III) have the exact same classification. This is not found persuasive. MPEP 808.02(C) recites that a search burden has been established Where it is necessary to search for one of the inventions in a manner that is not likely to result in finding art pertinent to the other invention(s) (e.g., searching different classes/subclasses or electronic resources, or employing different search queries), a different field of search is shown, even though the two are classified together. In the instant case, a search burden has clearly been established (even though Groups are classified together) because it is necessary to search for one of the inventions (a blanket having a pouch with a chemical to suppress a rechargeable battery fire, i.e. Group II) in a manner that is not likely to result in finding art pertinent to the other invention(s) (i.e. Groups I and III). The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 1-7, 17, 19, and 20 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected apparatus invention(s), there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 5-26-26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 8, 9, and 11-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee Yong Kwon (KR 102551591 B1, hereinafter (“Lee”). Re claims 8, 9, and 11-16, Lee (Fig 3) discloses a fire extinguishing blanket (110) comprising: a layer comprising a fire retardant material having an inner surface and an outer surface separated by a thickness of the layer; a pouch (140) connected to the layer inner surface that defines a pouch volume; a fire extinguishing material (150) positioned in the pouch volume, the fire extinguishing material comprising a chemical to suppress a rechargeable battery fire, wherein the pouch is at least partially formed of a pouch material that degrades at a fire release temperature to release the fire extinguishing material; at least one of: a weighted material (120) positioned in a perimeter region of the layer ,the weighted material having a density greater than a layer density and fire extinguishing material density, wherein the weighted material is configured to improve an aerodynamic parameter and thereby provide the fire extinguishing blanket that is controllably throwable; and/or one or more fasteners connected to the fire retardant material outer surface and/or fire extinguishing material layer, wherein the fasteners are configured to provide a blanket open configuration and a blanket wrapped configuration sized to contain a rechargeable battery and thereby provide the fire extinguishing blanket that is wrappable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee. Lee discloses the claimed invention except for the extinguishing materials in this claim. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to simply substitute the materials in Lee to be of the type claimed, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. Claim(s) 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Butler (US 2025/0135251). Lee discloses the claimed invention with the exception of an array of temperature sensors connected to at least one surface of the layer, wherein the array of temperature sensors are configured to measure a temperature of the rechargeable battery; an alarm operably connected to the array of temperature sensors to generate a warning of an adverse battery temperature event indicative of an initiation risk corresponding to a battery thermal runaway; and optionally, a rechargeable battery cut-off having an actuatable switch configured to open upon the adverse battery temperature event. Butler (Fig 2) teaches a blanket having an array of temperature sensors connected to at least one surface of the layer, wherein the array of temperature sensors are configured to measure a temperature of the rechargeable battery; an alarm operably connected to the array of temperature sensors to generate a warning of an adverse battery temperature event indicative of an initiation risk corresponding to a battery thermal runaway; and optionally, a rechargeable battery cut-off having an actuatable switch configured to open upon the adverse battery temperature event. The purpose of the sensors in Butler is to allow for real-time monitoring of thermal events associated with products such as vehicles and provides visual and audio alerts (p. [0007]). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the blanket in Lee to have the sensors of Butler. The motivation (as taught by Butler) would be to allow for real-time monitoring of thermal events associated with products such as vehicles and provides visual and audio alerts. All claimed elements were known in the prior art and one skilled in the art could have combined the elements as claimed by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination would have yielded predictable results to a skilled artisan at the time the invention was made. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REGINALD S TILLMAN, JR whose telephone number is (571)270-7010. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 830-530. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REGINALD S TILLMAN, JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702772
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF DETECTING INCORRECT CONNECTIONS IN A HUMIDIFICATION SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704343
SHOOTING REST AND SUPPORT SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704338
TRIGGER DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704335
HANDGUN AND MAGAZINE THEREFOR
1y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698943
TRIGGER ASSEMBLY WITH SAFETY FEATURES
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+11.2%)
1y 11m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1387 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month