Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/972,326

ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 06, 2024
Priority
Feb 23, 2023 — CN 202310155497.3 +1 more
Examiner
CHANG, CHARLES S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Innolux Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
807 granted / 1030 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1040
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
63.8%
+23.8% vs TC avg
§102
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1030 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 3-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Isobe (US 20100110326) in view of Nakanishi et al. (US 20050099402). Regarding claim 1, Isobe discloses (Figs. 1-4) an electronic device, comprising: a display panel (10), including: a first substrate (10a); a second substrate (10b) disposed opposite to the first substrate; and a display medium layer (section 0043) disposed between the first substrate and the second substrate; and a viewing angle switchable panel (20a) disposed on the display panel and provided with: a third substrate (20aa); a fourth substrate (20ab) disposed opposite to the third substrate; and a switching medium layer (section 0051) disposed between the third substrate and the fourth substrate. Isobe does not necessarily disclose at least one of the third substrate and the fourth substrate has a thickness of 5 µm to 50 µm. Nakanishi discloses (Figs. 1-9) at least one of the third substrate and the fourth substrate has a thickness of 5 µm to 50 µm (section 0084). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teaching of Nakanishi to obtain a transparent and thin electronic device. Regarding claim 3, Isobe discloses (Figs. 1-4) a polarizer (12a, 21) disposed between the display panel and the viewing angle switchable panel. Regarding claim 4, Isobe discloses (Figs. 1-4) an adhesive layer (26a-26c) disposed between the display panel and the viewing angle switchable panel. Regarding claim 5, Isobe discloses (Figs. 1-4) a touch sensing layer (sections 0069-0070) disposed on the viewing angle switchable panel. Regarding claim 6, Isobe discloses (Figs. 1-4) the touch sensing layer is disposed on a substrate to form an out-cell touch sensing panel disposed on the viewing angle switchable panel (sections 0069-0070). Regarding claim 7, Isobe discloses (Figs. 1-4) the display panel further comprises a display layer disposed on an inner surface of the first substrate; and a color filter layer disposed on an inner surface of the second substrate (sections 0043-0045). Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Isobe in view of Hinata et al. (US 6812974). Regarding claim 2, Isobe does not necessarily disclose at least one of the first substrate and the second substrate has a thickness of 5 um to 50 um. Hinata discloses (Figs. 1-9) disclose at least one of the first substrate and the second substrate has a thickness of 5 µm to 50 µm (col. 8 lines 21-30). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teaching of Hinata to obtain a thin display device. Claims 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Isobe and Nakanishi in view of Lee et al. (US 20130154977). Regarding claim 8, Isobe does not necessarily disclose the viewing angle switchable panel further comprises a first insulating layer disposed on an inner surface of the third substrate; a first conductive layer disposed on the first insulating layer; a second insulating layer disposed on an inner surface of the fourth substrate; and a second conductive layer disposed on the second insulating layer. Lee discloses (Figs. 2, 5) the viewing angle switchable panel further comprises a first insulating layer (92a) disposed on an inner surface of the third substrate (81); a first conductive layer (91b) disposed on the first insulating layer; a second insulating layer (84) disposed on an inner surface of the fourth substrate (82); and a second conductive layer (86) disposed on the second insulating layer. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teaching of Lee to protect electrical components and to obtain a particular electric field. Regarding claim 9, Isobe discloses (Figs. 1-4) the switching medium layer is disposed between the first conductive layer and the second conductive layer (sections 0051-0053). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES S CHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-5024. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Caley can be reached at (571) 272-2286. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLES S CHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746740
PROJECTION ARRANGEMENT COMPRISING A COMPOSITE PANE AND P-POLARIZED RADIATION
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749869
BROADENED SPECTRUM LASER DIODE FOR DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748283
OPTICAL SYSTEM AND CAMERA MODULE COMPRISING SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736716
METALENS ARRAY AND DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724232
COUPLE-IN LENS ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+17.7%)
2y 8m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1030 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month