Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/973,097

WINDOW COVERING AND WINDOW COVERING OPERATION MECHANISM THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 08, 2024
Priority
Feb 07, 2024 — CN 202420288402.5
Examiner
SHABLACK, JOHNNIE A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Nien Made Enterprise Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
665 granted / 1019 resolved
+5.3% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1042
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
78.9%
+38.9% vs TC avg
§102
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1019 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. The abstract currently reads “Disclosed are…” which should be avoided. Claim Objections Claim 12 recites “annual member” which appears to be a typographical error and should read --annular member--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 2, 5, 8, 17, and 18 recite “roughly” which does not clearly define the bounds of the claim. Claim 12 requires “plural peripheral gears disposed in the base and each rotatable around the axial direction of the roller.” The limitation does not clearly claim the subject matter regarded as the invention. The specification describes the peripheral gears (32) being arranged in an annual manner around the central gear and the peripheral gears rotatable about posts (113) as described in paragraph [0060]. Claim 18 recites “the driving member at positioned in the fourth position” which is unclear. It is not understood what is required of the driving member. In view of the 112 issues the claims have been examined as best understood. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 would be allowed if the claim objections and rejections under 35 USC 112 above are overcome. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art of record fail to disclose or teach it obvious to provide the claimed combination of elements. The closest prior art, Kwak (US 8,191,605), Brown (US 11,859,447), Holt (US 10,407,983), Yu (US 9,765,864), Li (US 10,012,020), Kim (US 12,129,713), though teach elements of the invention, there is no specific teaching to provide the structure as claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Johnnie A. Shablack whose telephone number is (571)270-5344. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 6am-3pm EST, alternate Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Cahn can be reached at 571-270-5616. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Johnnie A. Shablack/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3634
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674354
DOUBLE-LAYER DAY-NIGHT CURTAIN SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668111
THERMAL SHADE FOR VEHICLE WITH PANORAMIC ROOF
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662872
ELECTRIC CURTAIN
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662873
PULLING CORD CONTROL DEVICE FOR WINDOW BLIND
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655683
LIGHTING MODULE FOR A BUILDING FACADE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.3%)
2y 4m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1019 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month