Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/973,217

SEAT HEAD RESTRAINT TILTING MECHANISM FOR FORE-AFT MOVEMENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 09, 2024
Examiner
NGUYEN, CHI Q
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fca US LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1699 granted / 2062 resolved
+30.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
2088
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§112
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2062 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This non-final Office action is in response to Applicant’s patent application number 18/973,217 filed on 12/9/2024. Currently, claims 1-19 are pending and examined. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/9/2024 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Re claim 1, line 13; a citation “there along” renders the claim indefinite and confusing because it’s unclear whether the Applicant meant “the first groove has a plurality of seats positioned alongside”? Clarification is required. Claims 2-10 depending upon the rejected claim 1 are also rejected. Claim 11, line 13; having the same issues as mentioned; therefore, claims 11-19 are rejected. Clarification is required. Re claim 2, line 2; a citation “the shape” does not have a proper antecedent basis. Correction is required. Claim 12, line 2; having the same issues as mentioned; therefore, claim 12 is rejected. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: no prior art discloses combination structures of a vehicle seat, including a position of the head restraint in the forward direction and rearward direction is controlled by a movement mechanism that includes a first plate that is fixed and has a first groove formed therein, a second plate that is movable relative to the first plate and has a second groove formed therein, and a bearing component that is positioned between the first plate and the second plate and located in each of the first and second grooves, the first groove has a plurality of seats positioned there along, and movement of the second plate relative to the first plate moves the bearing component through the first groove to a selected seat of the plurality of seats, as set forth in the claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure (see attached PTO-892). Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communication from the examiner should be directed to CHI Q. NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571) 272-6847. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 7AM-5PM or email: chi.nguyen@uspto.gov. If attempt to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Brian Mattei can be reached at (571) 270-3238. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pairdirect.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at (866) 217-9197. /CHI Q NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3635 PNG media_image1.png 323 328 media_image1.png Greyscale
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747592
BUILDING PROFILE AS WELL AS METHOD AND INSTALLATIONS FOR MANUFACTURING A BUILDING PROFILE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12735902
ACCOUSTIC FLOORING ASSEMBLY
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734947
ATTACHMENT OF COMFORT SYSTEM TO A TRIM COVER
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735890
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A MODULAR CEILING GRID BEAM THAT SUPPORTS CONSTRUCTION OF A CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT OR CATWALK
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729545
Improvements in or relating to flooring
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+12.4%)
2y 2m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2062 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month