Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/973,305

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING PROBABILITIES OF AN UNEXPECTED HAZARD DURING VEHICLE TRAVEL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 09, 2024
Examiner
RUDY, ANDREW J
Art Unit
3668
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
12m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
647 granted / 779 resolved
+31.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§112
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 779 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Claims 1-20 are pending. Drawings 3. Applicant’s Drawings submitted December 9, 2024 are acceptable. Priority 4. No Priority has been asserted by Applicant. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 & 112 5. The 103 and 112 rejections from the previous Office Action are withdrawn pursuant to Applicant’s June 30, 2026 Amendment and REMARKS 6. A further pertinent reference of interest is noted on the attached PT)-892. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 & 112 7. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 8. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gyllehammar et al., US 2025/0002056. Gyllehammar discloses, e.g. Figs. 1-4 and related text, a prediction system/method for a fleet, e.g. [0071], of autonomous vehicles, e.g. 100, comprising memory, e.g. 12, processor, e.g. 28,50, 3304, LIDAR sensor data, e.g. [0004], predict the behavior, e.g. [0051], of perceived events, e.g. hazard traffic situations. [0007, 0039, 0051, 0072], behavior probability, e.g. real time reaction [0012, 0054, 0056, 0064, 0072-0077, 0088, 0103], associated with the environment, e.g. [005, 0011, 0013, 0024, 0038-42, 0048-0056, 0071, 0087-89]. Gyllehammar does not disclose the term planning model nor a time period., nor crowdsourced. However, a planning model associated with planning the trajectory of a vehicle over an environment, e.g. period of time (e.g. night time versus day time), along with crowdsourced data has been common knowledge in the autonomous vehicle art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Official Notice of such is taken. To have provided discrete a method/system containing these features for Gyllehammar would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, as to modify Gyllehammar to include these multiple discrete system/steps with a reasonable expectation of success as the motivation for doing such is to provide a workable vehicle management system/method to avoid collisions. Regarding claim 6, the term emergency is a relative term that Gyllehammar is deemed to include with the parameters disclosed when vehicle, e.g. 1, follows its trajectory/path. Regarding claim 7, the LIDAR sensors of Gyllehammar may inherently include images of light, as this is common knowledge in the application of LIDAR sensing. To have provided each Official Notice cited above would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. To have provided discrete method/system for Gyllehammar would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, for to modify Gyllehammar to include multiple discrete steps with a reasonable expectation of success as the motivation for doing such is to provide a workable vehicle energy management. Conclusion 9. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 10. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW JOSEPH RUDY whose telephone number is 571-272-6789. The examiner can generally be reached on Monday thru Friday from about 10am-6pm EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful the examiner’s supervisor, Fadey Jabr, can be reached on 571-272-1516. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Andrew Joseph Rudy/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3668 571-272-6789
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Jun 29, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 29, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 30, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 23, 2026
Interview Requested
Oct 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765439
Agricultural Vehicle with a Working Component and a Method for Controlling the Working Component
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12769323
NAVIGATION SYSTEM FOR NAVIGATING AN AUTONOMOUS MOBILE ROBOT WITHIN A PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT
1y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12755633
PROVIDING ADVANCED WARNING OF UPCOMING CHANGES IN ROAD CONDITIONS AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA TO A VEHICLE DRIVER
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749393
DETECTING SAFETY-RELEVANT ROAD TRAFFIC CONFLICTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741674
SAFETY RULE GENERATION DEVICE, NAVIGATION SYSTEM, SAFETY RULE GENERATION METHOD, NAVIGATION METHOD, AND PROGRAM
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.0%)
2y 10m (~12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 779 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month