Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/973,682

GLOVE HOLDER AND CORRESPONDING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 09, 2024
Examiner
KRYCINSKI, STANTON L
Art Unit
3631
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Skan AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
688 granted / 1010 resolved
+16.1% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1032
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
31.7%
-8.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1010 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I in the reply filed on 22 December 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 17-19 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 22 December 2025. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 14 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1, line 9, it appears “allows to elastic bending a first one” should read--allows elastic bending of a first one-- Claim 14, all abbreviated terms should be given the full term in paratheses Claim 14, it appears “Polypropylen” should read --Polypropylene-- Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-5, 7-10, 12, 13 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Williams et al. (US Pub. No. 2003/0173478 A1). PNG media_image1.png 480 316 media_image1.png Greyscale In regards to claim 1, Williams teaches a glove holder (20), comprising: a frame (28) that is capable of being attached to an outer side of a containment (25); a support (46, 48, 50, 58) that protrudes from said frame and is operable to carry an arm section of a glovebox glove (G) (via portion 50); at least two finger elements (60) formed at a free end of said support, each of the at least two finger elements being insertable into one finger section of said glovebox glove; a flexible section that allows to elastic bending a first one of the finger elements towards a second one of the finger elements of the at least two finger elements such that a lateral span (S; see annotation above) of the glove holder at a position of the finger elements is reducible (i.e.; the arms 46 of the support are bendable to be flexed between various positions; Para. 0071). Therefore, the span (S) between the fingers can be reduced. In regards to claim 3, Williams teaches the flexible section is at least partially located on the support (i.e.; the arms 46 of the support are bendable to be flexed between various positions; Para. 0071). In regards to claim 4, Williams teaches two or more of the at least two finger elements (60) are arranged in a common plane (along the top plane of 58). In regards to claim 5, Williams teaches at least one of the finger elements (60) is arranged outside the common plane spanned by the two or more finger elements (i.e.; bending one of the arms 46 can move the fingers into different planes). In regards to claims 7 and 8, Williams teaches the at least two finger elements (60) are provided, at least in glove contact regions, with a surface of a material with reduced friction (claim 7); wherein the surface of the material with reduced friction comprises plastic material (claim 8; Para. 0067). In regards to claim 9, Williams teaches the flexible section has an elongated cross section (the passage 44 can be oval; (Para. 0070); and matches the shape of the arms 46; Para. 0034). In regards to claim 10, Williams teaches the first finger element (60) has a bending direction oriented towards the second finger element (60) (i.e.; the fingers can bend toward each other via the bending section of arms 46). In regards to claim 12, Williams teaches the at least two finger elements (60) comprise outer finger elements and inner finger elements, and the outer finger elements are attached to the support at a distance from where the inner finger elements are attached to the support (i.e.; the outer fingers are attached at the outer ends of 58 in Fig. 1). In regards to claim 13, Williams teaches the first finger element (60) is made of plastic (Para. 0067). In regards to claim 15, Williams teaches at least two of the finger elements have different geometry (e.g.; the fingers of 62b, Fig. 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2, 6, 11 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Williams et al. (US Pub. No. 2003/0173478 A1) in view of Fenohr (US Pat. No. 907,137). In regards to claims 2, 6, 11 and 16, Williams does not teach the flexible section is at least partially located on at least the first finger element of the at least two finger elements (claim 2); the at least one of the finger elements has the flexible section (claim 6); the at least two finger elements comprise at least two of the first finger elements that each have a flexible section that allows bending of each of the first finger elements towards at least one of the other of the first finger elements or the second finger element (claim 11); and wherein two of the outer finger elements have a coinciding springiness (claim 16). Fenohr teaches a glove holder having at least two finger elements (3), including inner and outer finger elements, wherein flexible sections in the form of elastic pivots and springs (4, 6) are located on the fingers such that the flexible section is at least partially located on at least the first finger element of the at least two finger elements (claim 2); the at least one of the finger elements has the flexible section (claim 6); the at least two finger elements comprise at least two of the first finger elements that each have a flexible section that allows bending of each of the first finger elements towards at least one of the other of the first finger elements or the second finger element (claim 11); and wherein two of the outer finger elements have a coinciding springiness (claim 16). See Page 1, Lines 25-51. It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date and with reasonable expectation of success to modify Williams’s glove holder such that the flexible section is at least partially located on at least the first finger element of the at least two finger elements (claim 2); the at least one of the finger elements has the flexible section (claim 6); the at least two finger elements comprise at least two of the first finger elements that each have a flexible section that allows bending of each of the first finger elements towards at least one of the other of the first finger elements or the second finger element (claim 11); and wherein two of the outer finger elements have a coinciding springiness (claim 16). The motivation would be for the purpose of allowing the fingers to be separated as desired, and any may be pulled forward so that a glove placed thereon may be readily cleaned at the bases or roots of and between the fingers as taught by Fenohr (Page 1, Lines 45-51). Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Williams et al. (US Pub. No. 2003/0173478 A1) in view of Pitcher (US Pat. No. 4,697,724). In regards to claim 14, Williams does not teach the plastic comprises at least one of POM, PDM, EPDM (ethylene propylene diene monomer), PP (Polypropylen), Silicon or a POM PTFE blend. Pitcher teaches a glover holder have finger elements made of polypropylene (Col 2, Lines 56-58). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date and with reasonable expectation of success to modify Williams’s finger element to be made of polypropylene. The motivation would be for the purpose of using resilient high impact plastic as taught by Pitcher (Col 1, Lines 62-66). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please see the PTO-892 for additional prior art related to the Applicant’s disclosed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STANTON L KRYCINSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-5381. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 10:00AM-5:00PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Liu can be reached at (571)272-8227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Stanton L Krycinski/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3631
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588759
RETAINING BRACKET FOR MODULAR SHELVING UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589840
ELECTRICALLY ACTUATED WATERSPORTS BOARD RACKS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582227
SAMPLE RANDOMIZER FOR BLIND TESTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580264
BATTERY TRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575671
WEIGHT TRAINING EQUIPMENT STORAGE RACK SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+28.2%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1010 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month