Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/973,862

GLITCH MITIGATION IN SWITCHED REACTANCE PHASE SHIFTERS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 09, 2024
Priority
Jan 24, 2017 — divisional of 15/414,187 +1 more
Examiner
CHEN, PATRICK C
Art Unit
2842
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
pSemi Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
480 granted / 582 resolved
+14.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
621
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 582 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. In addressing the rejection ground, each claim may not have been separately discussed to the extent the claimed features are the same as or similar to the previously-discussed features; the previous discussion is construed to apply for the other claims in the same or similar way. In the office action, “/” should be read as and/or as generally understood. For example, “A/B” means A and B, or A or B. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 8-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Staudinger (US 2013/0194017) in view of George US 2010/0066427 (or Lam (US 2015/0171828). Regarding claim 8, Staudinger discloses a plurality of series-coupled phase shifter cells [e.g. fig. 2/1] each providing at least one selectable phase shift state, wherein at least one phase shifter cell [e.g. 107, 109/109,111 or any two immediately adjacent phase shifting element] includes at least two selectable signal paths [each phase shifting element has at least one selectable signal path], each selectable signal path having an active state [e.g. the bottom path] and an inactive state [e.g. the top path], wherein a first selectable signal path initially in the active state remains in the active state for a selected period of time when a next selectable signal path is set to the active state, and thereafter the first selectable signal path is set to the inactive state. Staszewski does not disclose a distinct switching delay time. However, George discloses a distinct switching delay time [see at least para. 0015, 0020, 0024, figs. 3-5], such that the combination discloses at least one phase shifter cell has a switching delay time distinct from the switching delay time of at least one other phase shifter cell. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device disclosed by Staudinger in accordance with the teaching of George regarding control signals in order to reduce or eliminate switch latch-up problem [para. 0015]. Alternatively, Lam discloses a distinct switching delay time [see at least abstract, figs. 5-6], such that the combination discloses at least one phase shifter cell has a switching delay time distinct from the switching delay time of at least one other phase shifter cell. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device disclosed by Staudinger in accordance with the teaching of Lam regarding the timing of state transitions in order to significantly reducing glitches [see at least abstract]. Regarding claim 9, the combination discussed above discloses the plurality of series-coupled phase shifter cells of claim 8, wherein at least two phase shifter cells provide approximately the same selectable phase shift state but have distinct switching delay times. Regarding claim 10, the combination in claim 9 discloses the plurality of series-coupled phase shifter cells of claim 8, wherein at least three phase shifter cells provide approximately the same selectable phase shift state but have distinct switching delay times. Regarding claim 11, the combination discussed above discloses the plurality of series-coupled phase shifter cells of claim 8, further including a control signal generation circuit [e.g. 123] coupled to the selectable signal paths of at least one phase shifter cell, and configured to be coupled to a master control signal [see 157] , for generating a sequence of time-delayed control signals [e.g. 1a, 1b, 2a,… Staudinger, also see at least para. 0015, 0020, 0024, figs. 3-5 George/ see at least abstract, figs. 5-6 Lam] for the coupled selectable signal paths such that when switching from the first selectable signal path initially in the active state to the next selectable signal path initially in the inactive state, the first selectable signal path remains in the active state for a selected period of time while the next selectable signal path is set to the active state, and thereafter the first selectable signal path is set to the inactive state. Regarding claim 12, Staudinger discloses the plurality of series-coupled phase shifter cells of claim 8, wherein at least one phase shifter cell includes at least two selectable signal paths [each phase shifting element has at least one selectable signal path] and a selectable reference path [see 129, S1b, 143; 151. S2b, the capacitor], each selectable signal path and the selectable reference path having an active state and an inactive state, wherein: (a) a first selectable signal path initially in the active state remains in the active state for a selected period of time [see at least para. 0015, 0020, 0024, figs. 3-5 George/ see at least abstract, figs. 5-6 Lam] when a next selectable signal path is to be set to the active state; (b) the selectable reference path is set to the active state during the selected period of time and before the next selectable signal path is set to the active state; (c) the next selectable signal path is set to the active state and the first selectable signal path is set to the inactive state; and (d) thereafter the selectable reference path is set to the inactive state. Regarding claim 13, the combination discussed above discloses the plurality of series-coupled phase shifter cells of claim 12, further including a control signal generation circuit [e.g. 123] coupled to the selectable signal paths and the selectable reference path of at least one phase shifter cell, and configured to be coupled to a master control signal [see 157], for generating a sequence of time-delayed control signals [see at least para. 0015, 0020, 0024, figs. 3-5 George; or see at least abstract, figs. 4-5 Lam] for the coupled selectable signal paths and selectable reference path such that when switching from the first selectable signal path initially in the active state to the next selectable signal path initially in the inactive state, the first selectable signal path remains in the active state for a selected period of time while the selectable reference path is set to the active state, and thereafter the next selectable signal path is set to the active state and the first selectable signal path is set to the inactive state, and thereafter the selectable reference path is set to the inactive state. Regarding claim 14, the combination discussed above discloses the plurality of series-coupled phase shifter cells of claim 12, except wherein the first selectable signal path has an opposite phase shift polarity with respect to the next selectable signal path. However, such the opposite phase shift polarity, is just am optimization for the circuitry and it is a design choice to achieve that optimum phase, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Regarding claim 15, the combination discussed above discloses the plurality of series-coupled phase shifter cells of claim 8, wherein at least one selectable phase shift state of at least one phase shifter cell includes at least two phase shifting states [e.g. the top path for 107, the bottom path for 109; the bottom path for 107, the top path for 109; or the bottom path for 107, the bottom path for 109, Staudinger] and a through-path state [e.g. the top path for 107, the top path for 109], wherein when switching from a first phase shifting state [e.g. the top path for 107, the bottom path for 109; the bottom path for 107, the top path for 109; or the bottom path for 107, the bottom path for 109] to a next phase shifting state [e.g. the bottom path for 107, the top path for 109; the bottom path for 107, the bottom path for 109; or the top path for 107, the bottom path for 109], the at least one phase shifter cell is set to the through-path state before being set to the next phase shifting state. Regarding claim 16, Staudinger discloses the plurality of series-coupled phase shifter cells of claim 15, further including a control signal generation circuit coupled to at least one phase shifter cell and configured to be coupled to a master control signal [see 107], the control signal generation circuit configured to generate a sequence of time-delayed control signals [see at least para. 0015, 0020, 0024, figs. 3-5 George; or see at least abstract, figs. 4-5 Lam] for the coupled at least one phase shifter cell in response to the master control signal such that when switching from the first phase shifting state to the next phase shifting state, the coupled at least one phase shifter cell is set to the through-path state before being set to the next phase shifting state. Regarding claim 17, the combination discussed above discloses the plurality of series-coupled phase shifter cells of claim 16, wherein the control signal generation circuit is configured to delay generating the time-delayed control signals for a selectable period time. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7 are allowed. Claims 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/17/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues: ‘Staudinger fails to disclose any teaching or suggestion that Staudinger's circuit operates such that "wherein a first selectable signal path initially in the active state remains in the active state for a selected period of time when a next selectable signal path is set to the active state, and thereafter the first selectable signal path is set to the inactive state". Indeed, Staudinger at para. 0025 states "... wherein the first and second switch [125, 131] or integrated circuit switch [225, 231] are alternatively activated (when switch 125 is ON or CLOSED, switch 131 is OFF or OPEN)" [emphasis added]. Thus, there is no selection of a first selectable signal path that is initially in the active state and remains in the active state for a selected period of time when a next selectable signal path is set to the active state, and thereafter the first selectable signal path is set to the inactive state.’ However, a next selectable signal path does not have to be the path corresponding to switch 131/231. A next selectable signal path can be the path corresponding to switch 153/253. For example, when bypass mode is considered as the active state, Staudinger discloses the first delay cell is in bypass mode (a first selectable signal path initially in the active state) and the second delay cell is in non-bypass/bypass mode change to the first delay cell is in bypass mode and the second delay cell is in bypass (e.g. a next selectable signal path is set to the active state), then the first delay cell transitions to non-bypass mode (e.g. inactive state); or similarly when non-bypass mode is considered as the active state, Staudinger discloses the first delay cell is in non-bypass mode and the second delay cell is in non-bypass/bypass mode (a first selectable signal path initially in the active state) change to the first delay cell is in non-bypass mode and the second delay cell is in non-bypass mode (e.g. a next selectable signal path is set to the active state), then the first delay cell transitions to bypass mode (e.g. inactive state). Accordingly, at least Staudinger discloses the features. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK C CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7207. The examiner can normally be reached M-F Flexible 8:00-16:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Regis Betsch can be reached at (571)270-7101. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK C CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 09, 2024
Application Filed
May 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 17, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772353
DIMMERS WITH AN IMPROVED GATE DRIVER CIRCUIT
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12750079
RECONFIGURATION OF CONFIGURABLE RECEIVER FRONT END MODULE BETWEEN PLURALITY OF MODES
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750934
DEVICE FOR GENERATING A CURRENT DRIVER VOLTAGE, AND LASER SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12722562
VEHICLE LIGHTING FIXTURE DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12697918
VEHICLE LAMP SYSTEM, LIGHT DISTRIBUTION CONTROLLING DEVICE, AND LIGHT DISTRIBUTION CONTROLLING METHOD
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+9.9%)
2y 4m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 582 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month