Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/974,113

VIRTUALIZED COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR VERIFICATION, TESTING, ASSESMENT AND, MITIGATION

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Dec 09, 2024
Priority
Jan 31, 2019 — provisional 62/799,573 +1 more
Examiner
GOORAY, MARK A
Art Unit
2196
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Altum Trading Company LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
315 granted / 414 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Strong +62% interview lift
Without
With
+62.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
439
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 414 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-2, 4-5 and 7-8 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12164461. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARK A GOORAY whose telephone number is (571)270-7805. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10:00am - 6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lewis Bullock can be reached at 571-272-3759. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARK A GOORAY/ Examiner, Art Unit 2199 /LEWIS A BULLOCK JR/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2199
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 09, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12761879
IDENTIFYING AND ISOLATING UNIQUE MONOLITHIC APPLICATION CODE
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754822
Predicting Application Resiliency Issues Using Machine Learning Techniques
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12748574
AUTOMATED WIDGET CODE GENERATION FROM DESIGN OBJECTS
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748587
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ISSUE COLLABORATIVE TRACKING
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12693934
DEDICATED RECOVERY MODULES FOR RESOLVING ISSUES WITH FAULTY APPLICATIONS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+62.0%)
3y 9m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 414 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month