Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/974,893

Floating Locking Insert

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 10, 2024
Examiner
LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES
Art Unit
3619
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Stryker Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
795 granted / 1081 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1125
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1081 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 12 is objected to because of the following informalities: Applicant uses the phrase “extending though the insert”. This should read “extending through the insert”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 and 12-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Castaneda et al. (US 2009/0088807). Regarding claim 1, Castaneda et al. disclose a method for repairing a bone, the method comprising positioning a plate (12) on a portion of the bone (¶18-19); positioning an insert (16) within an aperture (14) extending through the plate to define an insertion angle for a fastener (e.g. 18, ¶20, ¶32); and anchoring the fastener into the bone through an opening (28) extending through the insert such that a head (32, figure 2) of the fastener contacts an inner surface (20) of the opening, a collar (spikes 36’s which extend circumferentially around the perimeter of the outer surface form a spiked collar, figure 4) extending along a perimeter of an outer surface of the insert restricts rotation of the insert within the aperture and the fastener is locked to the insert and relative to the plate (¶27). Regarding claim 2, Castaneda et al. disclose the head and inner surface are each threaded (34, 44), and the anchoring step further comprises the head being threaded into the inner surface (figure 1, ¶27). Regarding claim 3, Castaneda et al. disclose the anchoring step further comprises the collar being configured to deform an inner surface defining the aperture (¶28). Regarding claim 4, Castaneda et al. disclose the step of positioning the insert further comprises compressing the insert to reduce a width of the insert for placement within the aperture (¶20). Regarding claim 5, Castaneda et al. disclose a slot (26) through the insert defines opposing insert ends (figure 4), and compressing the insert includes abutting the insert ends towards one another (¶20). Regarding claim 6, Castaneda et al. disclose the step of, prior to the step of positioning the insert, orienting the slot with a groove (22) defined within the aperture (¶32). Regarding claim 7, Castaneda et al. disclose the anchoring step further comprises the collar being configured to contact an upper end surface and a lower end surface of the plate within the aperture to restrict vertical rotation of the insert within the aperture about a longitudinal axis passing through the aperture (¶21). Regarding claim 8, Castaneda et al. disclose the inner surface is tapered (¶21) such that a first portion of the inner surface intersecting a top surface of the plate has a larger perimeter than a second portion of the inner surface intersecting a bottom surface of the plate (figure 1, ¶21). Regarding claim 12, Castaneda et al. disclose a method for repairing a bone, the method comprising positioning a plate (12) on a portion of the bone (¶18-19) including an insert (16) disposed within an aperture (14) extending through the plate; anchoring a fastener (18) into the bone through an opening (28) extending though the insert (¶27-28), wherein the fastener rotates the insert about a longitudinal axis (Ap, figure 1) passing through the aperture, and the plate restricts movement of the insert along the longitudinal axis (¶22). Regarding claim 13, Castaneda et al. disclose a collar (spikes 36’s which extend circumferentially around the perimeter of the outer surface form a spiked collar, figure 4) extends along a perimeter of an outer body of the insert (figure 4), and the anchoring step further includes the collar contacting the plate to restrict movement of the insert along the longitudinal axis (¶27-28). Regarding claim 14, Castaneda et al. disclose the anchoring step further comprises the collar being configured to contact an upper end surface and a lower end surface of the plate each extending towards the longitudinal axis within the aperture (figure 1, ¶21). Regarding claim 15, Castaneda et al. disclose the anchoring step further comprises the collar being configured to deform an inner surface defining the aperture (¶28). Regarding claim 16, Castaneda et al. disclose the anchoring step further comprises a head (32, figure 2) of the fastener being threaded into an inner surface defining the opening of the insert (figure 1, via 34 and 44, ¶27). Regarding claim 17, Castaneda et al. disclose a method for repairing a bone, the method comprising positioning a plate (12) on a portion of the bone (¶18-19); compressing an insert (16) from a rest condition to a compressed condition (¶20, ¶32); positioning the insert while in the compressed condition within an aperture (14) extending through the plate (¶20, ¶32); and anchoring a fastener (18) into the bone through an opening (28) extending through the insert, wherein the insert returns to the rest position after being positioned within the aperture and the fastener is locked to the insert and the insert is locked to the plate (¶20, ¶27-28, ¶32). Regarding claim 18, Castaneda et al. disclose the step of compressing the insert further comprises abutting insert ends defining a slot (26) through the insert towards one another. Regarding claim 19, Castaneda et al. disclose the step of positioning the insert further comprises orienting the slot within a groove (20) defined within the aperture (¶32). Regarding claim 20, Castaneda et al. disclose the anchoring step further comprises a head of the fastener (32) being threaded (44) into an inner surface (34) defining the opening of the insert (¶27, figures 1, 4). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Castaneda et al. (US 2009/0088807) in view of Martin (US 2015/0327898). Regarding claim 9, Castaneda et al. disclose the claimed invention except for the inner surface includes a first unthreaded section and first and second threaded sections, each of the unthreaded and the threaded sections having portions extending along a perimeter of the inner surface. Martin disclose a threaded opening with a plate having a first unthreaded section (5, figures 2-3) and first (threaded section to the “right” of 5) and second (threaded section to the “left” of 5) threaded section, each of the unthreaded and threaded sections having portions extending along a perimeter of the inner surface (figures 2-3 and 7-9). The unthreaded section allows for a plurality of possible implantation directions of the screw within the opening (¶56) as well as the ability to allow for a slight deformation by the presence of the unthreaded sections allowing for complete interlocking between the threads of the opening and the threads of the screw head (¶57). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to have constructed the inner surface of the opening of the insert to have an unthreaded section diving the threaded section into at least two sections as taught by Martin as the unthreaded section allows for a plurality of possible implantation directions of the screw within the opening as well as the ability to allow for a slight deformation by the presence of the unthreaded sections allowing for complete interlocking between the threads of the opening and the threads of the screw head. Regarding claim 10, Castaneda et al. in view of Martin disclose at least a portion of the first unthreaded section being between the first and the second threaded sections (figures 2-3 of Martin) is within a first plane orthogonal to a longitudinal axis passing through the insert (figures 2-3 of Martin). Regarding claim 11, Castaneda et al. disclose the first threaded section tapers along a portion of the inner surface relative to a longitudinal axis passing through the insert (figures 1, 4 ¶21). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW JAMES LAWSON whose telephone number is (571)270-7375. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 6:30-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anita Coupe can be reached at 571-270-3614. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW J LAWSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3619
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 13, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599487
TOOLS AND IMPLANTS FOR LATERAL DISC REPLACEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588953
DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NATURAL FEATURE TRACKING OF SURGICAL TOOLS AND OTHER OBJECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588914
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation System and Methods for Use
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582753
Systems and Methods for Forming An Antimicrobial Orthopedic Implant
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569314
MEDICAL DEVICES FOR AIRWAY MANAGEMENT AND METHODS OF PLACEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.2%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1081 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month