Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/975,067

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, ENCRYPTION DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC APPLIANCE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 10, 2024
Priority
Jan 23, 2024 — JP 2024-008078
Examiner
HUYNH, KIM NGOC
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sharp Semiconductor Innovation Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
43 granted / 74 resolved
-1.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
88
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
77.3%
+37.3% vs TC avg
§102
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 74 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1 and 9 are objected to because of the following formalities : Claim 1 recites the “ransom number”, this appears to be a typo and should be “random number instead. Claim 9 recites “an encryption circuit suppled with power” should be “the encryption circuit supplied with” instead since Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-6, and 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) and (a)(2) as being anticipated by Vaidya 20190007223. Regarding Claim 1. Vaidya a semiconductor device that supplies power to an encryption circuit [Fig. 1-3, par. 15-17, on die power circuits 104/106 on die and include buck converter and/or a boost converter supplying power to encryption circuit 108], the semiconductor device comprising: a voltage generator [Fig. 1-3] including a series regulator [converter 106, connecting in series to 108] and a shunt regulator [capacitor 104, par. 20-23, capacitor dissipates leftover power to ground, i.e. shunt regulator] a controller configured to randomly switch the shunt regulator between an ON state and OFF state. [par. 18. 20, power converter 106 operates switches 206 to conductively couple the capacitor to either the power source 104 or the encryption circuitry 108 based on randomizer 208. See also par. 11, 26-27] Claim 2. Vaidya teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the controller operates the shunt regulator in each of: a first operation mode in which the shunt regulator is maintained in the ON state; [par. 20, FIG. 2B a state of power converter 106 in which capacitor 204 is being used to power encryption circuitry 108] and a second operation mode in which the shunt regulator is maintained in the OFF state [ par. 20 FIG. 2 A a state of power converter 106 in which capacitor 204 is being charged and not supplying power to the encryption circuitry, see also par. 24]. Claim 4. Vaidya teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 1, further comprising: a random number generating circuit configured to generate a random number [par. 20, 27-29, digital power signature]; and a random pattern generating circuit configured to generate a random pattern corresponding to the random number [par. 20, 27-29, randomizer 208 provide a power signature varied with the encryption circuitry and includes a voltage regulator digitally controlled] wherein the controller switches the shunt regulator between the ON state and the OFF state in accordance with the random pattern [par. 20, randomizer 208 may be utilized by power converter 106 to vary the voltage output to encryption circuitry 108. Claim 5. Vaidya teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 4, wherein operation timing of the random pattern generating circuit is synchronous to operation timing of the encryption circuit [par. 27, the voltage level provided to encryption circuitry 108 may be varied with randomizer 208 and further randomize the power signature of encryption circuitry] Claim 6. Vaidya teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the voltage generator includes a current feedback circuit configured to supply the shunt regulator with a current when the shunt regulator is in the ON state, the current corresponding to a current output from the series regulator [par. 25, Power converter 106 may charge or recharge capacitor 204 with power source 104 such that current passes from power source 104 into inductor 202 and then into capacitor 204] Claim 8. Vaidya teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the shunt regulator is connected to an output end of the series regulator [Fig. 2, switches 206-2 and 206-3 provide connection to capacitor 104]. Claim 9. Vaidya teaches an encryption device [Fig. 1, item 102], comprising: the semiconductor device according to claim 1; and an encryption circuit supplied with power by the semiconductor device [Fig. 1-3, par .15-17] . Claim 10. Vaidya teaches an electronic appliance including the encryption device according to claim 9. [Fig. 1 and 6, par. 59]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vaidya in view of Seok, 20130191652 A1. Claim 7. Vaidya teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 1 but does not teach wherein the shunt regulator includes a shunt resistor a resistance value. Seok teaches an encryption circuit having a random generator [Fig. 6, noise generator 602] to superimpose on the current consumed by the encryption circuit [206] having an active shunt [abstract] wherein the shunt regulator [Fig. 4 and 6, par. 16-18, 20 and 22] includes a shunt resistor a resistance value of which is variable the shunt resistor [Fig. 4, par. 20-21, variable resistor R4]] being connected to a terminal that receives a voltage to be input to the voltage generator [ Vin to bus 404, 406]. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the active shunt circuit of Seok in order to help to maintain the current drawn at a substantially constant value to make it more difficult to crack encryption algorithm using differential power analysis and therefore provide a more secure information from the AES circuit [Seok, par. 2 and 22] Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIM HUYNH whose telephone number is (571)272-4147. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 6:30am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JAWEED ABBASZADEH can be reached at (571)270-1640. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KIM HUYNH/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2176
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671330
A NOVEL CONTROL METHOD FOR SWITCHED-MODE POWER SUPPLIES
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663998
Reset Using a Shared Reset Signal and a Retention Mechanism
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12650723
SOFTWARE ENTITY POWER CONSUMPTION ESTIMATION AND MONITORING
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12650721
CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12638903
POWER CONSUMPTION MANAGEMENT THROUGH APPLYING OF A SYSTEM POWER CAP ON HETEROGENOUS SYSTEMS
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (+0.6%)
2y 9m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 74 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month