Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/976,588

MANUFACTURING METHOD AND MaaS PROVIDING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Examiner
DEONAUTH, NIRVANA
Art Unit
3726
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
409 granted / 591 resolved
-0.8% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
622
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 591 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group l, corresponding to claims 1-5, in the reply filed on 12/31/25 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over C.E. Sorensen et al. (US 2,383,225) in view of Anderson et al. (US 11,807,397). Regarding to claim 1, C.E. Sorensen et al. discloses a manufacturing method comprising: a component (wing sections 16, as can be seen from Figure 1 in C.E. Sorensen et al.) to be attached to a body (fuselage section 24, as can be seen from Figure 1 in C.E. Sorensen et al.) of a flight vehicle (completed plane 32, as can be seen from Figure 1 in C.E. Sorensen et al.) on a carrier (conveyor 12, 14, 21, 23 and step of transporting and delivering stock to conveyors 12, 14, 21, 23, as described on page 4 column 2 lines 11-18 and can be seen from Figure 1 in C.E. Sorensen et al.) to a place where an installation height of the body (24) and an installation height of the component (16) loaded on the carrier (conveyor 12, 14, 21, 23 and step of transporting and delivering stock to conveyors 12, 14, 21, 23) match each other in an assembling line of the factory [as described on page 4 column 2 lines 11- page 5 column 1 line 50 and can be seen from Figure 1 in C.E. Sorensen et al.]; and attaching the component (16) directly to the body (24) from the carrier (conveyor 11, 12, 14, 21, 23 and step of transporting and delivering stock to conveyors 11, 12, 14, 21, 23) at the place. However, C.E. Sorensen et al. does not explicitly disclose a step of moving a vehicle transported from an outside of a factory while loading a component. Anderson et al., however, discloses a step of moving a vehicle (shipping containers 200, shipping fixtures 230, conveying mechanism 500, as can be seen from Figures 1-9 in Anderson et al.) from outside a factory while loading a component (aircraft component 300, as can be seen from Figures 1-9 in Anderson et al.). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method disclosed by C.E. Sorensen et al. to include a preliminary step of moving a vehicle transported from an outside of a factory, as taught by Anderson et al., as a known technique used to transport parts, which would yield predictable results. 6. Regarding to claim 2, C.E. Sorensen et al. modified by Anderson et al. discloses the manufacturing method according to claim 1, further comprising transporting the body (24) to the place by a conveyor (a second conveyor of 11, 12, 14) of the assembling line [Figure 1], wherein the conveyor at the place is at a height at which the installation height of the body (24) matches the installation height of the component loaded on the carrier [as described on page 4 column 2 lines 11-page 5 column 1 line 50 and can be seen from Figure 1 in C.E. Sorensen et al.] . 7. Regarding to claim 3, C.E. Sorensen et al. modified by Anderson et al. discloses the manufacturing method according to claim 1, further comprising causing the body (24) to perform self-driving to the place (self-driving via automatic conveyor), wherein a floor (floor surface of assembly line, as can be seen from Figure 1 in C.E. Sorensen et al.) of the assembling line at the place is at a height at which the installation height of the body (24) matches the installation height of the component (16) loaded on the carrier 11, 12, 14, 21, 23 [Figure 1 in C.E. Sorensen et al.] 8. Regarding to claim 4, C.E. Sorensen et al. modified by Anderson et al. manufacturing method according to claim 1, wherein: the place is provided with a pit for the vehicle to stop [Figure 1 in C. E. Sorensen]; and a depth of the pit is a depth at which the installation height of the body matches the installation height of the component loaded on the carrier (11, 12, 14, 21, 23) [as can be seen from Figure 1 in C.E. Sorensen et al.]. 9. Regarding to claim 5, C.E. Sorensen et al. modified by Anderson et al. manufacturing method according to claim 1, having a vehicle. However, the combination of C.E. Sorensen et al. and Anderson et al. does not explicitly disclose a step of stopping the vehicle while the vehicle is passing through the assembling line in a direction orthogonal to the assembling line. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to stop a vehicle in an orthogonal direction, as a known technique used to deliver parts, which would yield predictable results. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NIRVANA DEONAUTH whose telephone number is (571)270-5949. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hong can be reached at 5712720993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NIRVANA DEONAUTH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589817
FUEL TANK BOOST AND BOLT SECURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577735
SPIKE TRAY HEAD WITH REPLACEABLE WEAR PLATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12558750
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSFERRING A PART BEING MACHINED
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12522983
Cordless Railroad Spike Puller
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12454040
BOTTOM BRACKET TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 28, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.7%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 591 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month