Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/976,846

ACCOMMODATING SOFT CONTACT LENS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Priority
Jan 28, 2013 — provisional 61/757,457 +6 more
Examiner
SUMLAR, JOURNEY F
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Onefocus Technology LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
417 granted / 605 resolved
+8.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
633
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
56.6%
+16.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 605 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/18/2025 has been by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 2 and 4-12 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 2, 4, 7-15 of U.S. Patent No. 12,210,229 B2 in view of Lulino (US Patent Publication Number 2008/0231799 A1). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the instant application and the reference application both claim the following: Instant Application 18/976846 US 12,210,229 B2 Limitations that are obvious Claim 1. An accommodating contact lens comprising: an optical chamber; an eyelid-engaging chamber coupled to the optical chamber; and one or more channels extending between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber; wherein a soft contact lens material extending over the eyelid engaging chamber (see secondary reference below) is arranged to be selectively engaged with an eyelid to provide a liquid to the optical chamber via the one or more channels (see element (1) in limitations that are obvious section) and provide incremental increases in optical power of the optical chamber; wherein the liquid within the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber provides a deflection of an upper membrane of the optical chamber and an upper membrane of the eyelid-engaging chamber in order to facilitate fluidic communication and responsiveness between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber. Claim 1. An accommodating contact lens comprising: an optical chamber; an eyelid-engaging chamber coupled to the optical chamber; and one or more channels extending between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber; wherein a soft contact lens material is arranged to be selectively engaged with an eyelid in order to provide incremental increases in optical power; wherein top and bottom surfaces of the accommodating contact lens extend over the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber; wherein a liquid within the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber provides a deflection of an upper membrane of the optical chamber and an upper membrane of the eyelid- engaging chamber in order to facilitate fluidic communication and responsiveness between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber (a). (1) The channels provide a liquid to the optical chamber since the claim already discloses one or more channels extending between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber and that fluid is facilitated between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber (See (a) in the claim of Patent No. 12,210,229 B1). Claim 2. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, further comprising a flange extending around the optical chamber, the flange comprising a first material, the flange connected to the optical chamber to couple to a second material comprising hydrogel. Claim 2. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, further comprising a flange extending around the optical chamber and the eyelid engaging chamber, the flange comprising a first material and one or more anchors, the one or more anchors connected to the optical chamber and the eyelid engaging chamber to couple an optical zone and the eyelid engaging chamber to a second material comprising hydrogel. Claim 4. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 2, wherein one or more anchors comprises a plurality of openings formed in the flange and wherein the second material comprising hydrogel extends through the plurality of openings. Claim 4. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 2, wherein the one or more anchors comprises a plurality of openings formed in the flange and wherein the second material comprising hydrogel extends through the plurality of openings. Claim 5. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein an accommodation module is encapsulated within a soft contact lens material. Claim 8. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein an accommodation module is encapsulated within the soft contact lens material. Claim 6. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 5, wherein the accommodation module comprises a sealed module, the sealed module comprising, the optical chamber, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion, an upper membrane and a lower membrane coupled to the upper portion and the lower portion, respectively, so as to define the optical chamber. Claim 9. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 8, wherein the accommodation module comprises a sealed module, the sealed module comprising, the optical chamber, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion, an upper membrane and a lower membrane coupled to the upper portion and the lower portion, respectively, so as to define the optical chamber, and wherein a plurality of eyelid-engaging chambers comprises a fluid. Claim 7. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein a geometrical center of an optic of the soft contact lens material is co-linear with a geometrical center of the optical chamber. Claim 10. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein a geometrical center of an optic of the soft contact lens material is co-linear with a geometrical center of the optical chamber. Claim 8. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein an index of refraction of a fluid in the optical chamber is within a range from about 1.44 to 1.55 and top and bottom surfaces of the accommodating contact lens comprise a similar index of refraction to within about 0.05. Claim 11. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein an index of refraction of a fluid in the optical chamber is within a range from about 1.44 to 1.55 and the top and bottom surfaces of the accommodating contact lens comprise a similar index of refraction to within about 0.05. Claim 9. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises an internal diameter within a range from about 3 mm to about 5 mm. Claim 12. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises an internal diameter within a range from about 3 mm to about 5 mm. Claim 10. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion and the support structure comprises one or more of a ring, an oval or an annulus extending around the optical chamber. Claim 13. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion and the support structure comprises one or more of a ring, an oval or an annulus extending around the optical chamber. Claim 11. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion and the support structure defines a maximum dimension across the optical chamber and wherein the maximum distance across the optical chamber remains substantially fixed when a curvature of one or more of the upper or lower surfaces increases to provide increased optical power. Claim 14. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion and the support structure defines a maximum dimension across the optical chamber and wherein the maximum distance across the optical chamber remains substantially fixed when a curvature of one or more of the upper or lower surfaces increases to provide increased optical power. Claim 12. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 2, wherein the flange defines an outer perimeter extending around the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber. Claim 7. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 2, wherein the flange defines an outer perimeter extending around the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber. U.S. Patent No. 12,210,229 B2 fails to teach wherein a soft contact lens material extending over the eyelid engaging chamber. In a related art, Lulino teaches wherein a soft contact lens material (12, ¶0035 “an upper section 12 that has the same optical characteristics as a traditional soft contact lens”) extending over the eyelid engaging chamber (16; ¶0035 “the eyelid 34 presses on the reservoir 16”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill of art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified an accommodating contact lens, as taught by U.S. Patent No. 12,210,229 B1, with the soft contact lens material extending over the eyelid engaging chamber, as taught by Lulino, for the purpose of providing a soft contact lens that changes its optical characteristics dynamically in response to gaze dependent pressure fluctuations induced by the eyelids relative to one or more reservoirs of fluid (¶0033). Claims 1, 2 and 4-12 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 2, 4, 7-10, 12-14 of US 11,874,531 B2 in view of Lulino (US Patent Publication Number 2008/0231799 A1). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the instant application and the reference application both claim the following: Instant Application 18/976846 US 11,874,531 B2 Limitations that are obvious Claim 1. An accommodating contact lens comprising: an optical chamber; an eyelid-engaging chamber coupled to the optical chamber; and one or more channels extending between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber; wherein a soft contact lens material extending over the eyelid engaging chamber (see secondary reference below) ) is arranged to be selectively engaged with an eyelid to provide a liquid to the optical chamber via the one or more channels (see element (2) in limitations that are obvious section) and provide incremental increases in optical power of the optical chamber; wherein the liquid (see element (3) in limitations that are obvious section) within the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber provides a deflection of an upper membrane of the optical chamber and an upper membrane of the eyelid-engaging chamber in order to facilitate fluidic communication and responsiveness between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber. Claim 1. An accommodating contact lens comprising: an optical chamber; an eyelid-engaging chamber coupled to the optical chamber; and one or more channels extending between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber; wherein the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber each comprise a positive pressure and wherein a soft contact lens material is arranged to be selectively engaged with an eyelid in order to provide incremental increases in optical power; wherein top and bottom surfaces of the accommodating contact lens extend over the optical chamber and the eyelid engaging eyelid-engaging chamber; wherein said positive pressure of the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber provides a deflection of an upper membrane of the optical chamber and an upper membrane of the eyelid-engaging chamber in order to facilitate fluidic communication and responsiveness between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber (a) (2) The channels provide a liquid to the optical chamber since the claim already discloses one or more channels extending between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber and that fluid is facilitated between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber (See (a) in the claim of Patent No. 12,210,229 B1). (3) The positive pressures of the optical chamber are inherently a liquid. Claim 2. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, further comprising a flange extending around the optical chamber, the flange comprising a first material, the flange connected to the optical chamber to couple to a second material comprising hydrogel. Claim 2. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, further comprising a flange extending around the optical chamber and the eyelid engaging chamber, the flange comprising a first material and one or more anchors, the one or more anchors connected to the optical chamber and the eyelid engaging chamber to couple an optical zone and the eyelid engaging chamber to a second material comprising hydrogel. Claim 4. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 2, wherein one or more anchors comprises a plurality of openings formed in the flange and wherein the second material comprising hydrogel extends through the plurality of openings. Claim 4. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 2, wherein the one or more anchors comprises a plurality of openings formed in the flange and wherein the second material comprising hydrogel extends through the plurality of openings. Claim 5. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein an accommodation module is encapsulated within a soft contact lens material. Claim 8. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein an accommodation module is encapsulated within the soft contact lens material. Claim 6. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 5, wherein the accommodation module comprises a sealed module, the sealed module comprising, the optical chamber, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion, an upper membrane and a lower membrane coupled to the upper portion and the lower portion, respectively, so as to define the optical chamber. Claim 9. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 8, wherein the accommodation module comprises a sealed module, the sealed module comprising, the optical chamber, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion, an upper membrane and a lower membrane coupled to the upper portion and the lower portion, respectively, so as to define the optical chamber, and wherein a plurality of eyelid-engaging chambers comprises a fluid. Claim 7. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein a geometrical center of an optic of the soft contact lens material is co-linear with a geometrical center of the optical chamber. Claim 10. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein a geometrical center of an optic of the soft contact lens material is co-linear with a geometrical center of the optical chamber. Claim 8. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein an index of refraction of a fluid in the optical chamber is within a range from about 1.44 to 1.55 and top and bottom surfaces of the accommodating contact lens comprise a similar index of refraction to within about 0.05. Claim 12. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein an index of refraction of a fluid in the optical chamber is within a range from about 1.44 to 1.55 and the top and bottom surfaces of the accommodating contact lens comprise a similar index of refraction to within about 0.05. Claim 9. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises an internal diameter within a range from about 3 mm to about 5 mm. Claim 13. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises an internal diameter within a range from about 3 mm to about 5 mm. Claim 10. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion and the support structure comprises one or more of a ring, an oval or an annulus extending around the optical chamber. Claim 14. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion and the support structure comprises one or more of a ring, an oval or an annulus extending around the optical chamber. Claim 11. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion and the support structure defines a maximum dimension across the optical chamber and wherein the maximum distance across the optical chamber remains substantially fixed when a curvature of one or more of the upper or lower surfaces increases to provide increased optical power. Claim 15. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 1, wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber, the support structure comprising an upper portion and a lower portion and the support structure defines a maximum dimension across the optical chamber and wherein the maximum distance across the optical chamber remains substantially fixed when a curvature of one or more of the upper or lower surfaces increases to provide increased optical power. Claim 12. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 2, wherein the flange defines an outer perimeter extending around the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber. Claim 7. The accommodating contact lens as in claim 2, wherein the flange defines an outer perimeter extending around the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber. US 11,874,531 B2 fails to teach wherein a soft contact lens material extending over the eyelid engaging chamber. In a related art, Lulino teaches wherein a soft contact lens material (12, ¶0035 “an upper section 12 that has the same optical characteristics as a traditional soft contact lens”) extending over the eyelid engaging chamber (16; ¶0035 “the eyelid 34 presses on the reservoir 16”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill of art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified an accommodating contact lens, as taught by U.S. Patent No. 12,210,229 B1, with the soft contact lens material extending over the eyelid engaging chamber, as taught by Lulino, for the purpose of providing a soft contact lens that changes its optical characteristics dynamically in response to gaze dependent pressure fluctuations induced by the eyelids relative to one or more reservoirs of fluid (¶0033). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 2 and 4-12 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the double patenting rejections, set forth in this Office action. The prior art fails to teach all of the limitations of claims 1 which includes wherein the liquid within the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber provides a deflection of an upper membrane of the optical chamber and an upper membrane of the eyelid-engaging chamber in order to facilitate fluidic communication and responsiveness between the optical chamber and the eyelid-engaging chamber. Regarding claims 2 and 4-12 has dependency on independent claim 1. Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art fails to teach all of the limitations of claims 3 which includes wherein the optical chamber comprises a support structure extending around the optical chamber. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Porat (US Patent Number 5,483,304 A) teaches an accommodating contact lens comprising an optical chamber. Lai (US Patent Number 7,959,284 B2) teaches an accommodating contact lens comprising an optical chamber. Rosenthal (US Patent Publication Number 2006/0290883 A1) teaches an accommodating contact lens comprising an optical chamber. Lo (US Patent Publication Number 2007/0201138 A1) teaches an accommodating contact lens comprising an optical chamber. Win-Hall (US Patent Publication Number 2010/0245760 A1) teaches an accommodating contact lens comprising an optical chamber. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOURNEY F SUMLAR whose telephone number is (571)270-0656. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached at 571-272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JOURNEY F. SUMLAR Examiner Art Unit 2872 24 July 2026 /RICKY L MACK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699296
PARTICLE REMOVAL DURING FABRICATION OF ELECTROCHROMIC DEVICES
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12681328
METHOD FOR SIMULATING OPTICAL PRODUCTS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674983
NEAR-TO-EYE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669720
CONTACT LENSES HAVING MULTIPLE WAVE PLATE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661002
PREFERENTIAL VISUAL ACUITY TEST CABIN
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+11.4%)
2y 11m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 605 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month