Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/977,066

MODULAR CADDY FOR CARRYING WINDOW CLEANING ACCESSORIES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Priority
Dec 12, 2023 — DK PA202330392
Examiner
NASH, BRIAN D
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Maykker Products Aps
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1077 granted / 1314 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1330
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§102
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1314 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Examiner’s Comments The Examiner notes that the office action below may reference support found in the cited prior art by indicating element numbers, figures or by pointing out a specific paragraph (PAR) number in which support can be found. The PAR number referenced corresponds to paragraph number beginning in the "Detailed Description" of the disclosure unless otherwise noted. The pending claims are 1-10. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 10, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 9,297,611 to Roccisano. With regard to claims 1, 3, a modular caddy capable of carrying window cleaning accessories, the caddy comprising: a main bag (250) comprising a back panel (254) and a cover sheet (252) permanently attached to the back panel on its periphery to form a main receptacle with an opening (fig. 14), securing means (280) arranged on the back panel (fig. 15) for releasably securing the main bag to a garment; wherein at least one strip of webbing (260, fig. 14) is arranged on the outer surface of said cover sheet and fixed to said outer surface at regular intervals to form a series of gaps (PAR 9 discloses the front panel having a PALS and MOLLE system); at least one attachment means dimensioned to correspond to said gaps and configured for releasably attaching to said strip of webbing; and at least one modular unit attachable to said main bag at said strip of webbing using said at least one attachment means (PAR 9 discloses webbing 260 and stitching 262 defining a plurality of attachment gaps for securing accessories thereto). With regard to claim 10, wherein the exterior of at least one of said main bag or said modular unit is made of polyurethane coated nylon fabric, and the interior of at least one of the main bags or said modular unit is made of vinyl (PAR 7 discloses a variety of materials that the bag made be made of including polyester and fabric). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2, 5-8, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 9,297,611 to Roccisano in view of US 2016/0029777 to Gadams et al. As discussed above and with regard to claims 2, 5-6, Roccisano discloses the invention substantially as claimed including a modular caddy with a front panel having webbing creating a series of gaps for securing modular accessories thereto, but does not explicitly disclose a modular unit of similar shape as the caddy being attached to gaps created by said webbing. Gadams discloses (fig. 3) a modular unit (pocket device 23) being of similar shape as the caddy and capable of holding miscellaneous items, secured to gaps created by webbing on a front panel of a modular caddy. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to apply the teaching of Gadams with the modular caddy of Roccisano. A person of ordinary skill would have been motivated to do so, with a reasonable expectation of success, for the purpose of securing accessories to the front panel of the caddy. As discussed above and with regard to claims 7-8, Roccisano discloses the invention substantially as claimed including a modular caddy with a front panel having webbing creating a series of gaps for securing modular accessories thereto, but does not explicitly disclose a modular unit comprising a bottle holder or tube receptacle being attached to gaps created by said webbing. Gadams discloses (fig. 3) a modular unit (pocket device 23) being of similar shape as the caddy and capable of holding miscellaneous items, secured to gaps created by webbing on a front panel of a modular caddy. Gadams further discloses other embodiments of attachments and/or secured items be used. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to apply the teaching of Gadams with the modular caddy of Roccisano and secure such an item as a water bottle holder and/or a narrower tube unit. A person of ordinary skill would have been motivated to do so, with a reasonable expectation of success, for the purpose of securing a bottle holder for hydration needs of the user and/or a cylindrical handle of an item. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 9,297,611 to Roccisano in view of US 2023/0208114 to Thiel et al. As discussed above and with regard to claim 9, Roccisano discloses the invention substantially as claimed including a modular caddy with a front panel having webbing creating a series of gaps for securing modular accessories thereto, but does not explicitly disclose a modular unit comprising a receptacle having a waterproof inner lining. Thiel discloses a modular caddy system having a waterproof pouch (PAR 0104). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the clamed invention to apply the teaching of Thiel with the modular caddy of Roccisano. A person of ordinary skill would have been motivated to do so, with a reasonable expectation of success, for the purpose of providing a modular attachment unit with waterproof properties. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but appears to be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Refer to attachment (PTO-892) for notice of references cited and recommended for consideration based on their disclosure of limitations of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Brian Nash whose telephone number is 571-272-4465. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The official fax number for this Group is: 571-273-8300; Inventor Assistance Center is 800-786-9199. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system; see www.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /BRIAN D NASH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734 9/22/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 11, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765697
CONVERTIBLE SLING-TYPE BABY CARRIER
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12767059
CLAMP ASSEMBLY FOR RECONFIGURABLE ROOF RACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12758002
Tool Attachment System
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752715
ADJUSTABLE FASTENING SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12728936
BED MOUNTED TIRE CARRIER WITH COMPLIANCE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 0m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1314 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month