Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/977,592

BAGS AND BAG ASSEMBLIES

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Priority
Jun 06, 2024 — CIP of 29/945,981 +4 more
Examiner
MAI, TRI M
Art Unit
3733
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Acushnet Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
36%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
57%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 36% of cases
36%
Career Allowance Rate
522 granted / 1444 resolved
-33.9% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1503
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
75.0%
+35.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1444 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 14-17 are withdrawn from further consideration. Applicant made the election of Group 3, directed to the embodiment in figures 17A, without traverse, in the response dated 02/12/2026 is acknowledged. The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the following claimed features must be shown, without entering any new matter: all the fasteners of clip, hooks in claim 2. The specification is objected to: the “first side”, the “second side” have no antecedent basis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 2-5, 12-13, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter. In claim 2, the specification does not define what comprises a “clip” or “hooks”. The elected embodiment shows a first connector to be a buckle. It is unclear whether the buckle as shown in the elected embodiment comprises the claimed “clip” as claimed since the specification merely defines the elected fastener 2152 to be “a connector”. Also, the only embodiment shown is a defined as “G-shaped buckle”, it is unclear whether this “G-shaped buckle” also comprises this clip or hooks in the same recitation. If yes, this is a double inclusion. In claim 4, the recitation “the second set of connectors comprises a buckle member” is confusing. The plurality of claimed connectors should have a plurality of connecting members. In claim 12, the “the first bag comprises a luggage bag .. more buckle members” is confusing. The disclosure only shows a bag with only buckle member to be mated with the buckle on the strap (at 1902/ 2051/2152). There is no disclosure with a connection strap with two buckles for mating two buckle on the luggage bag. Note that Applicant defines “G-shaped buckle” at 2151/2052/1901, but these “G-shaped buckle” are not attachable with buckles connector on luggage. Rather, it only connected to loops as disclosed. In claim 5, it is unclear whether “buckle members provided on or attached to the first bag or the second bag” comprises the first and second connector configurations in claim 1. This is a double inclusion. In claims 12 and 13, it is unclear whether “one or more buckle members” is the same as “a first connector configuration” in claim 1 and “one or more loops or connection rails” is the same as “a second connector configuration”. This is a double inclusion. In claim 20, “and/or” renders the claim indefinite since it is unclear whether the limitations following said recitation are included. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. SET I: Claims 1-13, and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Latshaw (5547052). PNG media_image1.png 433 366 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 608 643 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 575 607 media_image3.png Greyscale The auxiliary carrier means 88 is provided for positioning, connecting, and/or carrying the briefcase 250 or the like exteriorly of either the wheeled luggage 50 or the foldable garment bag 100. The auxiliary carrier means 88 is shown in the form of a rigid U-shaped wire frame connector or carrier secured to a second end portion 86b of the third elongate strap 86 of the luggage connector 80 which overlies upper and upper front portions of the wheeled luggage 50 and/or the foldable garment bag 100. The second elongate strap 84 has a pair of mating connectors 85a, 85b respectively secured to a pair of extension straps 89a, 89b which, in turn, are secured to first and second end portions 84a, 84b of the second elongate strap 84. The pair of mating connectors 85a, 85b matingly receive the pair of connectors 114a, 114b secured to upper rear portions of the foldable garment bag 100 (FIG. 10). (12) As best illustrated in FIGS. 2, 7-8, and 13, the luggage connector 80 also preferably includes a third elongate strap 86 having a first end portion 86a arranged to be detachably connected either to the retaining ring member 87 secured to the rear wall 52, 62 of the wheeled luggage 50 or to a retaining ring member 83 secured to medial portions of the first elongate strap 81. The first end portion 86a preferably is detachably secured to the retaining ring member 83 by VELCRO.TM.-type fasteners secured to the first end portion 86a of the third elongate strap 86. Regarding claim 1, Latshaw teaches a bag assembly, comprising a first bag (55) with a first connector configuration (87), a second bag (100’) with a second connector (114a/b) configuration that is different than the first connector configuration, and an adapter strap (figs. 6-8 at 86) configured to couple the first bag and the second bag to form a self-stabilizing bag assembly, wherein the adapter strap comprises an asymmetric strap comprising: (i) a first connector or a first set of connectors disposed on a first side of the adapter strap (note hooks and loops 82A/B); and (ii) a second connector or a second set of connectors (buckles 85A/B or 88) disposed on a second side of the adapter strap. Regarding claim 2, note the first connector comprises at least hook (in hook and loop). Regarding claim 3 note the connection in clips in Latshaw engage or interface with at least a loop (formed by ring 87). Regarding claims 4-5, note the buckle members 85A/B and 114a/b. Regarding claim 6, note the first side of the adapter strap comprises a single connector. Regarding claims 7 and 8, note the second side of the adapter strap comprises a plurality of connectors (buckles) and they are different from the single connector. Regarding claim 9-12, note that the first and second bag are reversed as broadly recited, note the second side of the adapter strap comprises a single connector (claim 10) being the connector at 87/82A-B, and the first side being the buckles at 85A/B and they are different connector (claims 9 and 11-12). Regarding claim 13, note the second bag 100 in fig. 20 is an elongated bag. Note that the male buckle connections at 115a/116a comprises the rails as claimed. PNG media_image4.png 210 397 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 18, note the adapter strap comprises a first strap (89a/b), a second strap (84), and a third strap (81), wherein the first connector is attached or coupled to the first strap, and wherein the second connector (82a/82b) is attached or coupled to the third strap as claimed. Regarding claims 19-20, note there is an attachment interface between the straps, i.e., secured attached. SET II: Claims 1-11, and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lehtonen (20020371522) PNG media_image5.png 337 387 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 625 391 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 394 294 media_image7.png Greyscale Each of the attachment straps of the first and second pairs of attachment straps 4, 5 has one or more attachment points (e.g., complementary fasteners). Suitable fasteners can include, without limitation, hook-and-loop material (e.g., Velcro), snaps, hooks, carabiners, buckles, clasps (e.g., lobster claw clasps In another embodiment, shown in FIG. 8, the extension strap may include connectors 26, such as O-rings or D-rings Regarding claim 1, Lehtonen teaches a bag assembly, comprising a first bag (20) with a first connector configuration (handle 22); a second bag (21/3) with a second connector (handle where 23/24 attached) configuration that is different than the first connector configuration (note two handles are different), and an adapter strap configured to couple the first bag and the second bag to form a self- stabilizing bag assembly, wherein the adapter strap comprises an asymmetric strap comprising: (i) a first connector or a first set of connectors (16/17) disposed on a first side of the adapter strap; and (ii) a second connector or a second set of connectors (18) disposed on a second side of the adapter strap. Regarding claim 2, note the first connector comprises at least hook or buckle (see citation above). Regarding claim 3 note the connection in clips in Lehtonen engage or interface with at least a loop (being the entire extensible handle forming a loop) or connection rails (being the two side elongated telescoping handle) as claimed. Regarding claims 4-8, note that the first and second bag are reversed as broadly recited, note the first side of the adapter strap comprises a single connector being the connector at 8. The second bag being the suitcase 20, and second side of the adapter strap comprises a plurality of connectors connection in (4 and 5) and comprises connectors of buckles (see citation above) in claims 4-5, and 7, and note the plurality of connectors comprises a different type of connector than the single connector (note 4 and 5 can have other connectors) in claim 8. Regarding claims 9-11, note the first side of the adapter strap (4 and 5) comprises a plurality of connectors in claim 9, and the second side of the adapter strap comprises a single connector (on 6) in claim 10, note the plurality of connectors comprises a different type of connector than the single connector in claim 11. Regarding claim 18, note the adapter strap comprises a first strap (4), a second strap (5), and a third strap (6), wherein the first connector is attached or coupled to the first strap or the second strap, and wherein the second connector is attached or coupled to the third strap (6) as claimed. Regarding claims 19-20, note there is an attachment interface at 28A-28C. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lehtonen ‘522 in view of Lehtonen (9463752). PNG media_image8.png 394 454 media_image8.png Greyscale 12) One or more mechanical fastening means 13, such as a snap hook 14, an s-shaped hook, a spiral-shaped hook and so forth In the alternative, Lehtonen ‘752 teaches that it is known in the art to provide elongated members (similar to the elongated members of the handle in Lehtonen ‘522) to be connected member for a connection strap. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide the attachment being the fastening means at 13 attaching to the two elongated members of the handle in Lehtonen ‘522 to provide an alternative connection. SET III: Claims 1-13, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shi (D919962) in view of Castillo-Garrison (20080203127) or Miller (20110204114). Shi teaches a PNG media_image9.png 813 926 media_image9.png Greyscale PNG media_image10.png 559 346 media_image10.png Greyscale Shi teaches a bag assembly, comprising a first bag with a first connector configuration, an adapter strap configured to couple the first bag and the second bag to form a self- stabilizing bag assembly, wherein the adapter strap comprises an asymmetric strap comprising (i) a first set of connectors (clips) disposed on a first side of the adapter strap; and (ii) a second connector disposed on a second side of the adapter strap (buckle). Shi meets all claimed limitations except for the second bag with a second connector. PNG media_image11.png 682 552 media_image11.png Greyscale Castillo-Garrison teaches that it is known in the art to provide a second bag at 13 attached to a first bag at a buckle connection which is different from the clips on the first connection. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide the second bag 13 attached to the second side of the adapter strap in Shi to carry the desired contents and/or for easy access. PNG media_image12.png 572 296 media_image12.png Greyscale Accessory bases D and E may also be coupled to other single loop slide release buckles (male) having additional accessories such as, but not limited to a bottle bag T. Other exemplary accessories (not shown) that may be coupled to the buckles O or P are an insulated beverage holder; a non-insulated beverage holder; a battery operated heated beverage holder; a covered beverage holder; a change pouch/wallet/purse holder; a book/journal holder; a CD/DVD case; an office supply holder; a decorative pouch/bag; a medication organizer; a fishing pole/fly rod base; a dog waste bag holder; a multipurpose knife/multi-tool sheath; a cordless drill holster; a small tool bag for holding screws, nails, drill bits; a snack holder; a binocular case; a first aid kit; a small make-up case; a dog leash; and an umbrella holder. Miller also teaches that it is known in the art to provide a second bag at T (cited above) attached to a wearable device matable with the device in Shi (buckle). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide the second bag attached to the second side of the adapter strap in Shi to carry the desired contents and/or for easy access. Regarding claim 2, note the first connector comprises clips. Regarding claim 3 note the connection in clips in Shi engage or interface with loops or connection rails as claimed (note the rings in Shi (on the backpack) comprises the loops and the loops arranged in a single rail as claimed). Regarding claim 4, note the second connector or the second set of connectors comprises a buckle member. Regarding claim 5, note the buckle engage the second bag as claimed. Regarding claims 9-11, note the first side of the adapter strap comprises a plurality of connectors (clip in Shi), and the second side of the adapter strap comprises a single connector (buckle) in claim 10, note the plurality of connectors (clip) comprises a different type of connector than the single connector (buckle) in claim 11. Regarding claims 6-8, note that the first and second bag are reversed as broadly recited, note the first side of the adapter strap comprises a single connector being the buckle and the first bag being the bag in either Castillo-Garrison or Miller as modified above. The second bag is the bag in Shi, and second side of the adapter strap comprises a plurality of connectors connection in Shi (claim 7), and note the plurality of connectors (clip) comprises a different type of connector than the single connector (buckle) (claim 8). Regarding claim 12, as the first and second bag are reversed as set forth supra in claims 6-8, note first bag with the buckle in either Castillo-Garrison or Miller comprises a luggage bag as claimed since these bags can be used as luggage. Also, the term “luggage” does not impart any structure over the bag in either Castillo-Garrison or Miller. Regarding claim 13, the second bag in Shi comprises an elongated travel bag with one or more loops (form be the ring of the loops connecting to the rings) configured to engage or receive the second connector or the second set of connectors. Regarding claim 18, note there is an attachment interface since the bottom strap overlaps the other two straps. Claims 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shi rejection, as set forth above, and further in view of Landis (20230106104) or Lehtonen (20020371522). PNG media_image13.png 417 258 media_image13.png Greyscale [0041] According to certain embodiments, the two peg strap portions 104 and 106 may be made of a webbing, rope, or other strap material that is sewn into one end of the body portion 102 at the base 108 of the Y. The elastic band 120 may be secured to the webbing sleeve 118 at the base 108 of the Y using stitching 132. In the alternative, Landis teaches that it is known in the art to provide first and second attachment interfaces being the sewing or stitching of the individual straps together. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide first and second attachment interfaces being the sewing or stitching of the individual straps together as taught by Landis to provide the desired attachment for the Y strap in Shi. PNG media_image5.png 337 387 media_image5.png Greyscale Also, Lehtonen teaches that it is known in the art to provide first and second attachment interfaces being the bag and loops at 28A-28C. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide first and second attachment interfaces as taught by Lehtonen to provide the desired attachment for the Y strap in Shi. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRI M MAI whose telephone number is (571)272-4541. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm (Mon-Friday). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Jenness can be reached at (571) 270-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. TRI M. MAI Examiner Art Unit 3733 /TRI M MAI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 11, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12628926
SUITCASE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12609547
CHARGING CUPHOLDER FOR SECURING MULTIPLE ITEMS
2y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12582579
PREMATURE INFANT PACIFIER
6y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569042
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MOBILE OFFICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564250
SPLIT HANDLE, NARROW ROLLING BAG
2y 2m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
36%
Grant Probability
57%
With Interview (+21.0%)
3y 2m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1444 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month