Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/977,796

RETROFIT CARTRIDGE SYSTEM WITH CONTROLLED FLOW, FOR CONVERTING TRADITIONAL URINAL INTO HYBRID

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Priority
Dec 11, 2023 — provisional 63/608,729
Examiner
LOEPPKE, JANIE MEREDITH
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Falcon Water Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
625 granted / 1135 resolved
-4.9% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1164
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.5%
+9.5% vs TC avg
§102
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1135 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 10-14 are objected to because of the following informalities: the preamble does not match the parent claim preamble. Examiner believes claims 10-14 should depend from independent claim 8 in some way; however, for the purpose of examination they are being treated as currently recited and dependent on claims 1, 2, 5 and 6. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 8, 10-11, 15-18, 22, and 24-25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent 11,219,341 (hereinafter Mclean). Regarding claim 1, Mclean discloses a cartridge system (10) comprising: a cartridge (12) formed to fit into the drain of a urinal (col. 8, ln. 21-27), the cartridge having an orifice (30) formed therein to regulate a flow of flushing water in a bowl of the urinal in a controlled manner such that the flushing water rises to a predetermined level and drains at a predetermined rate within the bowl when the urinal is flushed (col. 5, ln. 16-24). Regarding claim 2, Mclean discloses further comprising: a chemical volume (33) disposed within the bowl of the urinal, whereby when the urinal is flushed and the flushing water rises to the predetermined level within the bowl, the flushing water contacts the chemical volume and becomes chemically infused (col. 4, ln. 61-col. 5, ln. 2). Regarding claims 3 and 10, Mclean discloses wherein the chemical volume (33) is attached with the cartridge (via 32). Regarding claims 4 and 11, Mclean discloses wherein the chemical volume (33) is detachably attached with the cartridge (col. 5, ln. 1-8; col. 7, ln. 8-13). Regarding claim 8, Mclean discloses a urinal flushing system comprising: a flushing water source having an adjustable flush water output (col. 8, ln. 28-34); and a cartridge (12) formed to fit into the drain of a urinal (col. 8, ln. 21-27), the cartridge having an orifice (30) formed therein to regulate a flow of flushing water in a bowl of the urinal in a controlled manner such that the flushing water rises to a predetermined level and drains at a predetermined rate within the bowl when the urinal is flushed (col. 5, ln. 16-24). Regarding claim 15, Mclean discloses a cartridge system kit comprising: a cartridge (12) formed to fit into the drain of a urinal (col. 8, ln. 21-27), the cartridge having an orifice (30) formed therein to regulate a flow of flushing water in a bowl of the urinal in a controlled manner such that the flushing water rises to a predetermined level and drains at a predetermined rate within the bowl when the urinal is flushed (col. 5, ln. 16-24). Regarding claim 16, Mclean discloses further comprising: a chemical volume (33) disposed within the bowl of the urinal, whereby when the urinal is flushed and the flushing water rises to the predetermined level within the bowl, the flushing water contacts the chemical volume and becomes chemically infused (col. 4, ln. 61-col. 5, ln. 2). Regarding claim 17, Mclean discloses wherein the chemical volume (33) is attached with the cartridge (via 32). Regarding claim 18, Mclean discloses wherein the chemical volume (33) is detachably attached with the cartridge (col. 5, ln. 1-8; col. 7, ln. 8-13). Regarding claim 22, Mclean discloses a urinal flushing system kit comprising: a flushing water source having an adjustable flush water output (col. 8, ln. 28-34); and a cartridge (12) formed to fit into the drain of a urinal (col. 8, ln. 21-27), the cartridge having an orifice (30) formed therein to regulate a flow of flushing water in a bowl of the urinal in a controlled manner such that the flushing water rises to a predetermined level and drains at a predetermined rate within the bowl when the urinal is flushed (col. 5, ln. 16-24). Regarding claim 24, Mclean discloses wherein the chemical volume (33) is attached with the cartridge (via 32). Regarding claim 25, Mclean discloses wherein the chemical volume (33) is detachably attached with the cartridge (col. 5, ln. 1-8; col. 7, ln. 8-13). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5-7, 9, 12-14, 19-21, 23, 26-28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mclean in view of EP 2,487,304 (hereinafter Todd). Regarding claims 5, 12, 19 and 26, Mclean fails to show the orifice is adjustable to adjust the flow rate of the flushing water therethrough. Attention is turned to Todd in the same field of endeavor of urinal inserts which shows including an adjustable orifice (9, 15) to adjust the flow rate of flushing water through the cartridge (par. 40). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the claimed invention to modify the device of Mclean to include an adjustable orifice to control the flow of fluid through the cartridge as evidenced by the teachings of Todd. Regarding claims 6, 13, 20, and 27, as modified by Todd above, Todd shows the orifice is an orifice occlusion system (5, 6) comprising an orifice containing surface (5) having an orifice (9) with an area formed therethrough and a cover surface (6) disposed thereon, where the cover surface (6) occludes at least a portion of the orifice (9), and where at least one of the cover surface and orifice-containing surface can be moved relative to the other to adjust the area of the orifice to adjust the flow rate of the flushing water therethrough (par. 39, 40). Regarding claims 7, 14, 21, and 28, as modified by Todd above, Todd shows the orifice occlusion system includes a plurality of orifices (9) where the cover surface (6) can be moved to cover a portion of the plurality of orifices (par. 39). Regarding claims 9 and 23, Mclean fails to show the flushing water source includes an adjustable flushing water orifice to adjust flushing water output. Attention is turned to Todd in the same field of endeavor of urinal inserts which shows including an adjustable orifice (9, 15) to adjust the flow rate of flushing water through the cartridge (par. 40). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the claimed invention to modify the device of Mclean to include an adjustable orifice to control the flow of fluid through the cartridge as evidenced by the teachings of Todd. Conclusion Applicant is advised that should claims 1-14 be found allowable, claims 15-28 will be objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate thereof. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). The term “kit” in the preamble of claims 15-28 does not alter the scope of the claims sufficiently to preclude a duplicate claim warning as the entire text of both claim sets is identical other than the word “kit.” The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent Application Publication 2015/0074892 is directed to the state of the art of odor traps for drains in urinals. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JANIE M LOEPPKE whose telephone number is (571)270-5208. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM-5PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Angwin can be reached at (571) 270-3735. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JANIE M LOEPPKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692689
DRAINAGE CHANNEL AND USE OF A DRAINAGE CHANNEL IN A SANITARY FACILITY, IN PARTICULAR A SHOWER FACILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690723
MODULAR SHOWER CADDY DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687002
AIR ODOR REMOVAL SYSTEM AND TOILET BOWL PLATE WITH SEWAGE PLUMBING ATTACHMENT FOR A TOILET ASSEMBLY
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680287
RIM JET NOZZLE SYSTEM FOR TOILETS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680282
MULTIFUNCTIONAL FAUCET
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+29.3%)
2y 7m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1135 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month