Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/978,210

CELL MEASUREMENT METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Priority
Jun 13, 2022 — CN 202210661942.9 +1 more
Examiner
CAI, WAYNE HUU
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
727 granted / 914 resolved
+19.5% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
940
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
59.1%
+19.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 914 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on October 27, 2025 and January 15, 2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings were received on December 12, 2024. These drawings are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5-7, 9-14, and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Rao et al. (hereinafter “Rao”, US 2025/0151012). Regarding claims 1, 14, and 20, Rao discloses a cell measurement method, a communication apparatus (i.e., a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) as shown in Fig. 1B), and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform the cell measurement method, comprising: obtaining cell information (i.e., receiving configuration information from a first cell and a second cell indicating a first and a second sounding reference for positioning (SRSp) configuration associated with a first and second positioning area including a first and second cell ID as described in paragraph 0004); measuring at least one cell indicated by the cell information, to obtain a measurement result (i.e., transmitting a first and second SRSp using the first and second SRSp configuration as described in paragraph 0005); determining at least one target cell based on the measurement result (i.e., determining the second cell in the second positioning area as described in paragraph 0006); and sending a positioning request to a first network device, wherein the positioning request comprises information about the at least one target cell (i.e., the WTRU transmits a request to the second cell to activate the second SRSp configuration as described in paragraphs 0006-0007). With further regard to claims 14 and 20, Rao also discloses a communication apparatus comprising: a processing unit (i.e., processor 118 as shown in Fig. 1B), a transceiver unit (i.e., transceiver 120) and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions (i.e., non-removable memory 130 and removable 132 including a computer program as described in paragraph 0352). Regarding claims 5 and 18, Rao discloses all limitations as recited within claims as described above. Rao also discloses wherein the determining at least one target cell comprises: when a signal received power of a first cell is greater than a power threshold, or signal received quality is greater than a quality threshold, or a value of R in an R criterion is greater than a threshold, or a value of S in an S criterion is greater than a threshold, determining the first cell as the target cell, wherein the first cell is a cell that has been measured, that supports positioning, and that is in the cells indicated by the cell information (i.e., if the detected TRPs match with a configured set of TRPs and/or if the number of detected TRPs with good RSRP are greater than the threshold for a minimum number of TRPs needed for meeting the accuracy requirement, the WTRU selects the low BW SRSp configuration associated with the detected TRP as described in paragraph 0084). Regarding claims 6 and 19, Rao discloses all limitations as recited within claims as described above. Rao also discloses wherein the determining at least one target cell comprises: determining the first N second cells as the target cells in descending order of values of R in an R criterion, or values of S in an S criterion, or cell signal received powers, or cell signal received quality, wherein the second cell is a cell that has been measured, that supports positioning, and that is in the cells indicated by the cell information (i.e., if the detected TRPs match with a configured set of TRPs and/or if the number of detected TRPs with good RSRP are less than the threshold for a minimum number of TRPs needed for meeting the accuracy requirement, the WTRU selects the high BW SRSp configuration associated with the detected TRP as described in paragraph 0084). Regarding claim 7, Rao discloses all limitations as recited within claims as described above. Rao also discloses wherein the cell information is carried in either of the following messages: a broadcast message and a radio resource control RRC message; or the cell information is preconfigured information (i.e., cell ID as described in paragraphs 0004-0006, and Abstract). Regarding claim 9, Rao discloses all limitations as recited within claims as described above. Rao also discloses wherein the measuring at least one cell indicated by the cell information comprises: obtaining a measurement indication, wherein the measurement indication indicates to measure the at least one cell indicated by the cell information; and measuring the at least one cell indicated by the cell information (i.e., transmitting a first and second SRSp using the first and second SRSp configuration as described in paragraph 0005). Regarding claim 10, Rao discloses all limitations as recited within claims as described above. Rao also discloses wherein the obtaining a measurement indication comprises: when a higher layer detects a positioning event or a positioning indication, receiving the measurement indication from the higher layer (i.e., triggering events and/or conditions monitored by a WTRU for sending the capability information and/or assistance information on an LPHAP including reception of an indication or an LCS/LPP request from higher layers as described in paragraphs 0124-0125). Regarding claim 11 Rao discloses all limitations as recited within claims as described above. Rao also discloses wherein the method further comprises: when a measurement stop condition is satisfied, stopping measurement of the cell indicated by the cell information, wherein the measurement stop condition comprises any one of the following: a positioning request is sent, measurement time is greater than a first threshold, or a quantity of target cells is greater than a second threshold (i.e., the WTRU sends the information if the measurement values increase or decrease by certain corresponding threshold values as described in paragraphs 0128-0129). Regarding claim 12, Rao discloses all limitations as recited within claims as described above. Rao also discloses wherein the first threshold and/or the second threshold are/is carried in a broadcast message or an RRC message; or the first threshold and/or the second threshold are/is preconfigured values/a preconfigured value; or the first threshold and/or the second threshold are/is specified in a protocol (i.e., the WTRU sends the information if the measurement values increase or decrease by certain corresponding threshold values as described in paragraphs 0128-0129). Regarding claim 13, Rao discloses all limitations as recited within claims as described above. Rao also discloses wherein measurement periodicity information of the cell indicated by the cell information is carried in a broadcast message or an RRC message; or measurement periodicity information of the cell indicated by the cell information is preconfigured information; or measurement periodicity information of the cell indicated by the cell information is specified in a protocol (i.e., the WTRU sends reports of measurements to a network periodically as described in paragraphs 0115-0116, 0078-0080, and 0129-0130). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2, 8, and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rao in view of Tang et al. (hereinafter “Tang”, US 2017/0078904). Regarding claims 2 and 15, Rao discloses all limitations recited within claims as described above, but does not expressly disclose features of these claims. In a similar endeavor, Tang discloses prioritized cell identification and measurement method. Tang also discloses wherein the measuring at least one cell indicated by the cell information comprises: measuring, in descending order of frequency priorities and/or cell priorities, the at least one cell indicated by the cell information (i.e., UE receives a list of frequency layers to measure based on order of priority as described in paragraphs 0029, and 0096-0106). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to prevent the UE from wasting resources on low-value frequencies. Regarding claim 8, Rao and Tang disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Tang also discloses wherein information about the cell priority and/or the frequency priority is carried in a broadcast message or an RRC message; or information about the cell priority and/or the frequency priority is preconfigured information (i.e., UE receives a list of frequency layers to measure based on order of priority as described in paragraphs 0029, and 0096-0106). Claim(s) 3 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rao in view of Tang and further in view of Geng et al. (hereinafter “Geng”, US 2022/0217602). Regarding claims 3 and 16, Rao and Tang disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above, but do not expressly disclose features of these claims. In a similar endeavor, Geng discloses cell reselection method and apparatus. Geng also discloses wherein the measuring, in descending order of frequency priorities and/or cell priorities, the at least one cell indicated by the cell information comprises: when cells indicated by the cell information comprise a plurality of cells with a same frequency priority, measuring the plurality of cells with the same frequency priority in descending order of cell priorities (i.e., the terminal device measures a plurality of cells that meet a reselection criterion, the terminal device sorts the cells by ranking values. For example, for frequencies with same priority, if the plurality of cells meet the reselection criterion, ranking is performed based on cell quality as described in paragraph 0082). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to enable the terminal to select a suitable cell to camp as soon as possible. Claim(s) 4 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rao in view of Li et al. (hereinafter “Li”, US 2025/0227528). Regarding claims 4 and 17, Rao discloses all limitations recited within claims as described above, but does not expressly disclose features of these claims. In a similar endeavor, Li discloses measurement gap scaling based on inter-gap proximity in concurrent gap pattern. Li also discloses wherein the measuring at least one cell indicated by the cell information comprises: when both first measurement and second measurement exist, preferentially performing the first measurement, wherein the first measurement comprises measuring, in a positioning scenario, the at least one cell indicated by the cell information, and the second measurement comprises measuring a found cell in a scenario of cell selection or cell reselection (i.e., the priority level is based on the purpose of the measurement such as mobility measurements, positioning measurements as described in paragraph 0058-0061). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to avoid simultaneous measurement conflicts and ensure successful completion of required measurements. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WAYNE CAI whose telephone number is (571)272-7798. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 7:00 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KATHY WANG-HURST can be reached at (571)270-5371. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Wayne H Cai/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12712685
METHOD AND RADIO ACCESS NETWORK NODE FOR ALLOCATING RESOURCES FOR AN APERIODIC SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12695580
PREEMPTION FOR LOW LATENCY APPLICATION BY USING NULL TONES OR DEDICATED RESOURCE UNIT (RU) FOR SUSPEND REQUEST FEEDBACK
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684514
USER EQUIPMENT (UE) AND COMMUNICATION METHOD FOR UE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684465
INTERNET PROTOCOL (IP) PRIVACY INDICATION AND ACTIVATION IN ACCESS NETWORKS
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671520
DUPLICATED PACKET TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+15.5%)
3y 0m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 914 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month