Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/978,390

Work Vehicle

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Priority
Mar 15, 2024 — JP 2024-041171
Examiner
CRAIG, DANIEL THOMAS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kubota Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
25 granted / 30 resolved
+23.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
66
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
55.3%
+15.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 30 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This action is in reply to the Applicant’s claims, filed on 12/12/2024. Claims 1-4 are currently pending and have been examined. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Japan on 03/15/2024. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the JP2024-041171 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Deckard et al. (US8,800,706). Claim 1. Deckard discloses: A work vehicle (100 vehicle, Fig. 1), comprising: a driver seat (192 operator position on 176 seating, Fig. 4); a passenger seat adjacent to the driver seat (174 area includes seating 176 for one or more passengers, Fig. 1); an operation pedal which is forward and downward of the driver seat and which is configured to control a traveling speed of the work vehicle in response to the operation pedal being stepped on by a driver sitting on the driver seat (204 first foot pedal actuatable by the vehicle operator to control the acceleration and speed of 100, Fig. 5); a footrest section which is forward and downward of the passenger seat and which is used for a passenger sitting on the passenger seat to put a foot on (360 floor panel and/or 398 front panel forward and downward of 176 seating; Fig. 9); and a partition section which is between the operation pedal and the footrest section and which separates a region for the operation pedal from the footrest section (structure of 394 guard and surrounding floor panel features separates 204 from 360 and 398, Fig. 7, 9), the partition section having a rear portion comprising a rear inclined surface portion configured such that a further forward portion of the rear inclined surface portion is closer to the footrest section in a plan view (rear portion of the structure of 394 guard and surrounding floor panel features comprises a rear inclined surface (identified as 396) where the forward portion of the incline is closer to 398, Fig. 7). Claim 2. Deckard discloses: The work vehicle according to claim 1, wherein: the rear inclined surface portion is in a shape increasing in width in a right-left direction toward a lower side in a back view (lower rear end of the structure of 394 guard and surrounding floor panel features increases in width at the rear as compared to the front end of the structure, Fig. 9). For further clarification of the mapping, Fig. 9 is show below: [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: textbox (R)][AltContent: textbox (F)][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 570 737 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 3. Deckard discloses: The work vehicle according to claim 2, wherein: the partition section comprises a lateral surface portion facing the operation pedal which lateral surface portion comprises a lateral inclined surface portion configured such that a further downward portion of the lateral inclined surface portion is closer to the operation pedal in the back view (surfaces of the structure of 394 guard and surrounding floor panel features include a lateral surface (blue and green), comprising of a lateral inclined surface (green) facing 204, see clarification of mapping below of Fig. 9), and the rear inclined surface portion is connected to the lateral inclined surface portion in such a manner as to be in a shape increasing in width in the right-left direction toward the lower side to be directed toward the operation pedal in the back view (surfaces are coupled to 396 and increases in width from front to back, Fig. 9). For further clarification of the mapping, Fig. 9 is show below: [AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image2.png 747 677 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim 4. Deckard discloses: The work vehicle according to claim 1, wherein: the partition section comprises an upper end portion at a position higher than the operation pedal (front upper end of structure of 394 guard is implicitly higher as it prevents the passenger foot from entering operation position and inadvertently depressing 204; Fig. 8-9; Col. 4, lines 26-33). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Daniel Craig whose telephone number is (571)270-0747. The examiner can normally be reached M-Thurs 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tara Schimpf can be reached at (571)270-7741. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL T CRAIG/Examiner, Art Unit 3676 /TARA SCHIMPF/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3676
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735960
REAR-MOUNTED DOUBLE-CHANNEL ABRASIVE JET CUTTING DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12723478
DRILLING FLUID CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12680402
Composite Hollow Profiles For Downhole
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669269
Systems for Generating Energy from Geothermal Sources and Methods of Operating and Constructing Same
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662914
PERFORATING TOOL WITH A HYDRAULICALLY ACTUATED ASSEMBLY
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.8%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 30 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month