Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 18/978,448

PHYSICAL RESOURCE BLOCKS OUTSIDE DOWNLINK SUBBAND FOR PHYSICAL DOWNLINK SHARED CHANNEL

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Priority
Apr 29, 2024 — provisional 63/640,031
Examiner
HAQUE, ABUSAYEED M
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
614 granted / 667 resolved
+34.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -3% lift
Without
With
+-2.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
703
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 667 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION This office action is a response to an application filed on 12/12/2024, in which claims 1-20 are pending and ready for examination. Priority Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 10-11 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C 102 (a (2) as being anticipated by NAEMANS et al. (hereinafter, “NAEMANS”; CN117715200). (For citation purpose, examiner has used an English translation of CN117715200. The original copy and the English translation describe the same innovation. The publication date of CN117715200 is MAR/15/2024; therefore, it qualifies as a prior art under 35 U.S.C 102 (a) (2)). In response to claims 1, 10 and 19 NAEMANS teaches an apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors, coupled to the one or more memories, configured to cause the UE to (page, 14, paragraph 3, using UEs are interpreted as using a user equipment (UE), page 14, paragraph 5 teaches about using a processor, page 15, paragraph 2 teaches about using a memory coupled with a processor ): receive an indication of whether one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) that are outside of a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols are scheduled for one or more physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) communications (page 5, paragraph 4 (lines 23-41), using flexible symbol with SFBD layout is interpreted as using SFBD symbols, using each subband and each symbols to indicate a resource block (RB) area (for DL-UL switching) explicitly teaches using one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, using a dynamic scheduling with a flexible link is interpreted as scheduling one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols with one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) that are outside of a downlink subband, page 6, paragraph 2, SIB or RRC signal is equated to an indication, page 6, paragraph 2, lines 26-35, restricting uplink (UL) channels (PUSCH PUCCH or PARCH) for based on downlink allocated flexible resource for downlink channel (e.g. PDCCH, PDSCH) is interpreted as scheduling the SBFD symbols for a PDSCH communication, page 7,paragraph 2, configuring one or more frequency domain subband positing to the UE via a higher layer signaling (by a gNB) is interpreted as receiving by the UE the indication signal, page 7, paragraph 2,using a downlink (DL) subband is interpreted as using the PRBs those are within a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, and using a uplink (UL) subband is interpreted as using PRBs those are outside of a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, page 8, paragraph 3 ,using the SFBD time series with restricted flexible time slot sequence in “TDD-UL-DL-configurationCommon” is interpreted as using one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) that are outside of a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols for the PDSCH communication); and receive the one or more PDSCH communications based at least in part on the indication (page 6, paragraph 2, lines 26-35, restricting uplink (UL) channels (PUSCH PUCCH or PARCH) for based on downlink allocated flexible resource for downlink channel (e.g. PDCCH, PDSCH) is interpreted as using a PDSCH communication, page 7,paragraph 2, configuring one or more frequency domain subband positing to the UE via a higher layer signaling (by a gNB) is interpreted as receiving by the UE the indication signal). In response to claims 2, 11 and 20, NAEMANS teaches wherein the one or more PRBs that are outside of the downlink subband are not downlink-usable PRBs (page 5, paragraph 4 (lines 23-41), using flexible symbol with SFBD layout is interpreted as using SFBD symbols, using each subband and each symbols to indicate a resource block (RB) area (for DL-UL switching) explicitly teaches using one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs), page 7, paragraph 2, uplink (UL) subband is interpreted as using one or more PRBs that are outside of the downlink subband are not downlink-usable PRBs are not downlink-usable PRBs, page 8, paragraph 3 ,using the SFBD time series with restricted flexible time slot sequence in “TDD-UL-DL-configurationCommon” is interpreted as using one or more PRBs that are outside of the downlink subband are not downlink-usable PRBs). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-9 and 12-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. As for dependent claims 3 and 12, these claims are objected, because there is no prior art in the record that teaches claimed limitations “wherein the one or more PRBs that are outside of the downlink subband are scheduled for the one or more PDSCH communications, wherein one or more PRBs that are inside of the downlink subband are scheduled for the one or more PDSCH communications, and wherein the one or more PRBs that are outside of the downlink subband and the one or more PRBs that are inside of the downlink subband are associated with respective modulation and coding schemes (MCSs).” The closet prior art in the record NAEMANS et al.’s (CN117715200) teaching on page 5, paragraph 4 (lines 23-41) about using flexible symbol with SFBD layout is interpreted as using SFBD symbols, using each subband and each symbols to indicate a resource block (RB) area (for DL-UL switching) explicitly teaches using one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, using a dynamic scheduling with a flexible link is interpreted as scheduling one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols with one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) that are outside of a downlink subband, his teaching on page 6, paragraph 2 about using a SIB or RRC signal is equated to an indication, his teaching on page 6, paragraph 2, lines 26-35, about restricting uplink (UL) channels (PUSCH PUCCH or PARCH) for based on downlink allocated flexible resource for downlink channel (e.g. PDCCH, PDSCH) is interpreted as scheduling the SBFD symbols for a PDSCH communication, his teaching on page 7,paragraph 2 about configuring one or more frequency domain subband positing to the UE via a higher layer signaling (by a gNB) is interpreted as receiving by the UE the indication signal,using a downlink (DL) subband is interpreted as using the PRBs those are within a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, and using a uplink (UL) subband is interpreted as using PRBs those are outside of a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, his teaching on page 8, paragraph 3 about using the SFBD time series with restricted flexible time slot sequence in “TDD-UL-DL-configurationCommon” is interpreted as using one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) that are outside of a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols for the PDSCH communication. He fails to teach the above cited limitations. As for dependent claims 4 and 13, these claims are objected, because there is no prior art in the record that teaches claimed limitations “wherein the one or more PRBs that are outside of the downlink subband are scheduled for the one or more PDSCH communications, wherein one or more PRBs that are inside of the downlink subband are scheduled for the one or more PDSCH communications, and wherein the one or more PRBs that are outside of the downlink subband and the one or more PRBs that are inside of the downlink subband are associated with respective transport blocks (TBs).” The closet prior art in the record NAEMANS et al.’s (CN117715200) teaching on page 5, paragraph 4 (lines 23-41) about using flexible symbol with SFBD layout is interpreted as using SFBD symbols, using each subband and each symbols to indicate a resource block (RB) area (for DL-UL switching) explicitly teaches using one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, using a dynamic scheduling with a flexible link is interpreted as scheduling one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols with one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) that are outside of a downlink subband, his teaching on page 6, paragraph 2 about using a SIB or RRC signal is equated to an indication, his teaching on page 6, paragraph 2, lines 26-35, about restricting uplink (UL) channels (PUSCH PUCCH or PARCH) for based on downlink allocated flexible resource for downlink channel (e.g. PDCCH, PDSCH) is interpreted as scheduling the SBFD symbols for a PDSCH communication, his teaching on page 7,paragraph 2 about configuring one or more frequency domain subband positing to the UE via a higher layer signaling (by a gNB) is interpreted as receiving by the UE the indication signal,using a downlink (DL) subband is interpreted as using the PRBs those are within a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, and using a uplink (UL) subband is interpreted as using PRBs those are outside of a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, his teaching on page 8, paragraph 3 about using the SFBD time series with restricted flexible time slot sequence in “TDD-UL-DL-configurationCommon” is interpreted as using one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) that are outside of a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols for the PDSCH communication. He fails to teach the above cited limitations. Claims 5 and 14 depend on claims 4 and 13. As for dependent claims 6 and 15, these claims are objected, because there is no prior art in the record that teaches claimed limitations “wherein the one or more PRBs that are outside of the downlink subband are scheduled for the one or more PDSCH communications, wherein one or more PRBs that are inside of the downlink subband are scheduled for the one or more PDSCH communications, and wherein the one or more PRBs that are outside of the downlink subband and the one or more PRBs that are inside of the downlink subband are associated with a single transport block (TB).” The closet prior art in the record NAEMANS et al.’s (CN117715200) teaching on page 5, paragraph 4 (lines 23-41) about using flexible symbol with SFBD layout is interpreted as using SFBD symbols, using each subband and each symbols to indicate a resource block (RB) area (for DL-UL switching) explicitly teaches using one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, using a dynamic scheduling with a flexible link is interpreted as scheduling one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols with one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) that are outside of a downlink subband, his teaching on page 6, paragraph 2 about using a SIB or RRC signal is equated to an indication, his teaching on page 6, paragraph 2, lines 26-35, about restricting uplink (UL) channels (PUSCH PUCCH or PARCH) for based on downlink allocated flexible resource for downlink channel (e.g. PDCCH, PDSCH) is interpreted as scheduling the SBFD symbols for a PDSCH communication, his teaching on page 7,paragraph 2 about configuring one or more frequency domain subband positing to the UE via a higher layer signaling (by a gNB) is interpreted as receiving by the UE the indication signal,using a downlink (DL) subband is interpreted as using the PRBs those are within a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, and using a uplink (UL) subband is interpreted as using PRBs those are outside of a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols, his teaching on page 8, paragraph 3 about using the SFBD time series with restricted flexible time slot sequence in “TDD-UL-DL-configurationCommon” is interpreted as using one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs) that are outside of a downlink subband configured in one or more subband full duplex (SBFD) symbols for the PDSCH communication. He fails to teach the above cited limitations. Claims 7-9 and 16-18 depend on claims 6 and 15. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. 2023026754…………………paragraph 229. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABUSAYEED HAQUE whose telephone number is (571)270-7252. The examiner can normally be reached 9 am -7:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at 571-272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABUSAYEED M HAQUE/Examiner, Art Unit 2466 /CHRISTOPHER M CRUTCHFIELD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772314
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MULTI-LINK OPERATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772093
TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12756522
CORESET#0 CONFIGURATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12744646
SIGNALING AND CONFIGURATION FOR MULTI ANTENNA/PORT PRS TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745161
TECHNIQUES FOR PAUSING SMALL DATA TRANSMISSIONS
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (-2.6%)
2y 4m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 667 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month