Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/979,555

COMPOSITE ENDOSCOPIC IMAGING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Priority
Jul 04, 2024 — provisional 63/667,712 +1 more
Examiner
ROY, BAISAKHI
Art Unit
3797
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hukui Biotechnology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
524 granted / 676 resolved
+7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
703
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
84.6%
+44.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 676 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Axelrod et al. (2011/0282192). With respect to claim 1, Axelrod et al. teach of a composite endoscopic imaging device or a fiber-optic multimodal OCT/photoacoustic endoscope with beam scanning by a 2D MEMS scanner present in the endoscopic head where the photoacoustic, OCT, and multi-spectral light sources are coupled to the endoscopic head (fig. 1, [0071]). Axelrod et al. teach of an axial imaging device for capturing an image in an axial direction of the composite endoscopic imaging device [0102, 0104]. Axelrod et al. teach of the composite endoscopic imaging device to include lenses (fig. 2, 3), a photosensitive element or photodetector disposed on an imaging path of the lens [0088, 0090] or CCD/CMOS [0051]. Axelrod et al. teach of the endoscope head module (MOEMS) to be equipped with a MEMS scanner and control electronics which are aligned by location in tight tolerance polyimide tubing (fig. 3, 4, 0066, 0075, 0082, 0084) and therefore under broadest reasonable interpretation, the composite endoscopic imaging device obviously includes a flexible printed circuit board as a MEMS scanner unit in an endoscope is very commonly integrated onto a flexible printed circuit board without requiring bulky space required for conventional wires. Axelrod et al. teach of a first radial imaging device or OCT device disposed behind the photoacoustic imaging device for capturing an image in a first radial direction of the composite endoscopic imaging device [0071, 0072, fig. 1]. With respect to claim 2, Axelrod et al. teach of the use of the first radial imaging device being an OCT device and the second radial imaging device to be photoacoustic imaging device or a combination of the photoacoustic, OCT, and multi-spectral imaging modalities [0064, 0081] with combination of OCT/PA imaging and switching between the different modalities [0081, 0083, claim 1]. With respect to claims 3 and 4, Axelrod et al. teach of the axial imaging device to comprise a reflection device disposed on the imaging path of the lens where the reflection device is a mirror [0075, 0077, 0080, fig. 2]. Axelrod et al. further teach of the upper surface of the photosensitive element or photodetector to be parallel to the axial direction and the lens forms an image on the photodetector via the mirror [0077, 0088]. With respect to claim 5, Axelrod et al. teach of the reflection device to be a double-sided reflection device or a beam-splitter [0090] and the first radial imaging device is an OCT device acquiring tomography image via the beam-splitter [0101]. With respect to claim 6, Axelrod et al. teach of the upper surface of the photodetector is perpendicular to the axial direction (fig. 2, 4) with the lens directly forming an image on the photodetector [0088] or the CCD/CMOS camera [0051] with the flexible printed circuit board or the MEMS scanner which are aligned by location in tight tolerance polyimide tubing allowing bending near the photodetector element (fig. 3, 0066, 0075). With respect to claim 7, Axelrod et al. teach of a second radial imaging device such as the photoacoustic imaging device disposed below the flexible printed circuit or the polyimide tubing as part of the endoscopic head for capturing an image in a second radial direction of the composite endoscopic imaging device [fig. 4, 0089, 0105]. With respect to claims 8-10, Axelrod et al. teach of the use of the first radial imaging device being an OCT device and the second radial imaging device to be photoacoustic imaging device or a combination of the photoacoustic, OCT, and multi-spectral imaging modalities [0064, 0081] with combination of OCT/PA imaging and switching between the different modalities [0081, 0083, claim 1]. Axelrod et al. teach of using the optical switch to switch from one imaging modality to another without removing the endoscope inserted into the body [0061] and incorporated in the single endoscopic head (fig. 1, 0072, 0081) and therefore it would be obvious that the first/second radial imaging device modalities are located in opposite directions to ensure switching between the modalities without removing the endoscope from the body. Axelrod et al. do not teach of all the claimed elements in a single embodiment. It would have therefore been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine elements from the different embodiments to integrate simultaneous use of multiple imaging modalities and switch between the modalities without removing the inserted endoscope from the body [0030]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAISAKHI ROY whose telephone number is (571)272-7139. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7-3 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koharski can be reached at 571-272-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BR /BAISAKHI ROY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3797
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678118
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE CAPTURING SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681115
OPTIMIZING A PULSE SEQUENCE USING AN OPTIMIZATION MAP
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12635886
ORAL ANALYSIS DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12622631
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING RETROGRADE TRANS-SYNAPTIC DEGENERATION
2y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616846
TREATMENT APPARATUS AND TREATMENT METHOD
3y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+18.8%)
3y 10m (~2y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 676 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month