Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/979,603

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANAGING ENTERING AND LEAVING

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 13, 2024
Priority
Dec 20, 2023 — JP 2023-215022
Examiner
WILBURN, MOLLY K
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
417 granted / 463 resolved
+30.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
480
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§103
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 463 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-5 are currently pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/13/2024 has been considered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1 and 5, the claims recite “ a single camera installed near the doorway” and “a single camera provided near the doorway”, respectively. The term “near” in claims 1 and 5 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “near” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Dependent claims 2-4 fail to remedy the indefinites of claim 1 and are therefore also rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yamaguchi (““Personal Identification by Learning-Based Integration of Facial Clothes Similarities”). Regarding claim 1, Yamaguchi teaches: A method for managing entering and leaving of a management target for a predetermined area having a single doorway, the method comprising: acquiring a face image and an entire body image of an arbitrary person passing through the doorway using a camera image captured by a single camera installed near the doorway; (Yamaguchi, page 308 section IV, A 12-person identification experiment is performed by shooting the room’s entrance from inside and entering and exiting. See also Figure 1, room has 1 door and input images of face and tops and bottoms (whole body)) detecting entering of the management target into the predetermined area by performing a face authentication process using the face image of the arbitrary person included in the camera image and a registered face image of the management target; (Yamaguchi, page 307, One or more face images per person are registered in advance in the system. The similarity between the detected image and each of the registered N image is calculated) extracting a feature quantity of the management target, of which entering into the predetermined area is detected by the face authentication process, from the entire body image of the management target included in the entire body image of the arbitrary person included in the camera image; (Yamaguchi, page 308, Since clothing changes day by day, the registration of Tops and Bottoms data is performed each day. Face recognition is performed by standing still in front of the camera only when entering the room for the first time each day. At this time, the system stores Tops and Bottoms data by detecting clothes) extracting a feature quantity of the arbitrary person using the entire body image of the same arbitrary person included in the camera image after the detection of the entering of the management target into the predetermined area; (Yamaguchi, page 308, Assuming that each registered data set of face, Tops and Bottoms, one data item is registered for each of registered K persons. Let sfk, stk, and sbk be the similarities of the detected person against the k0th registered data for face tops, and bottoms respectively) and detecting leaving of the management target from the predetermined area by performing re-identification process using the feature quantity of the management target extracted based on the camera image and the feature quantity of the arbitrary person extracted based on the camera image. (Yamaguchi, page 308 section IV, A 12-person identification experiment is performed by shooting the room’s entrance from inside and entering and exiting….See also page 308, Assuming that each registered data set of face, Tops and Bottoms, one data item is registered for each of registered K persons. Let sfk, stk, and sbk be the similarities of the detected person against the k0th registered data for face tops, and bottoms respectively) Regarding claim 5, Yamaguchi teaches: A device for managing entering and leaving of a management target for a predetermined area having a single doorway, the device comprising: one or more processors configured to perform various processes, wherein the one or more processors are configured to: (Yamaguchi, page 308, Raspberry Pi) acquire a face image and an entire body image of an arbitrary person passing through the doorway by using a camera image captured by a single camera provided near the doorway; (Yamaguchi, page 308 section IV, A 12-person identification experiment is performed by shooting the room’s entrance from inside and entering and exiting. See also Figure 1, room has 1 door and input images of face and tops and bottoms (whole body)) detect entering of the management target into the predetermined area by performing a face authentication process using the face image of the arbitrary person included in the camera image and a registered face image of the management target; (Yamaguchi, page 307, One or more face images per person are registered in advance in the system. The similarity between the detected image and each of the registered N image is calculated) extract a feature quantity of the management target, of which entering into the predetermined area is detected by the face authentication process, from the entire body image of the management target included in the entire body image of the arbitrary person included in the camera image; (Yamaguchi, page 308, Since clothing changes day by day, the registration of Tops and Bottoms data is performed each day. Face recognition is performed by standing still in front of the camera only when entering the room for the first time each day. At this time, the system stores Tops and Bottoms data by detecting clothes) extract a feature quantity of the arbitrary person using the entire body image of the arbitrary included in the camera image after the detection of the entering of the management target into the predetermined area; (Yamaguchi, page 308, Assuming that each registered data set of face, Tops and Bottoms, one data item is registered for each of registered K persons. Let sfk, stk, and sbk be the similarities of the detected person against the k0th registered data for face tops, and bottoms respectively) and detect leaving of the management target from the predetermined area by performing re-identification process using the feature quantity of the management target extracted based on the camera image and the feature quantity of the arbitrary person extracted based on the camera image. (Yamaguchi, page 308 section IV, A 12-person identification experiment is performed by shooting the room’s entrance from inside and entering and exiting…See also page 308, Assuming that each registered data set of face, Tops and Bottoms, one data item is registered for each of registered K persons. Let sfk, stk, and sbk be the similarities of the detected person against the k0th registered data for face tops, and bottoms respectively) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-4 are not rejected under the prior art and would be in condition for allowance if re-written in independent form and the above rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) were overcome. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. Refer to PTO-892, Notice of References Cited for a listing of analogous art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Molly K Wilburn whose telephone number is (571)272-3589. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Emily Terrell can be reached at (571) 270-3717. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Molly Wilburn/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2666
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705765
OBJECT TRACKING USING OPTICAL FLOW
5y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702912
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ROBOTIC CAMERA CALIBRATION
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702482
TECHNIQUES TO MAP THREE-DIMENSIONAL HUMAN ANATOMY DATA TO TWO-DIMENSIONAL HUMAN ANATOMY DATA
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12694643
METHOD FOR RECONSTRUCTING 3D INFORMATION FROM 2D IMAGE AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEASURING DISTANCE BETWEEN VEHICLES USING THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12667320
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EARLY WARNING OF CEREBRAL VASOSPASM AFTER SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 463 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month