Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/980,238

IMU- and EMG-Based Extended Reality Input Device and Method

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 13, 2024
Priority
Aug 05, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0103756
Examiner
DAVIS, DAVID DONALD
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
650 granted / 923 resolved
+8.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
961
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.5%
+2.5% vs TC avg
§102
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 923 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on July 9, 2026, has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-4, 6-8, 10-14, 16-18 and 20-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. Specifically, the specification fails to enable a skilled artisan to make and/or use an apparatus that has “the identified object” that “corresponds to a second object different from the first object”, as set forth in claim 1, lines 23-24 and “the identified object” that “corresponds to a first object”, as set forth in claim 1, lines 21-22. In other words, the specification fails to enable a skilled artisan to make and/or use an apparatus having “the identified object . . . different from the first object” while “the identified object corresponds to a first object”. Similar, lack of enablement exists in claim 11. Claims 1-4, 6-8, 10-14, 16-18 and 20-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Specifically, the claimed invention requires “a command corresponding to a combination of the identified gesture and the identified object” in claim 1, lines 17-18. However, the claimed invention also requires “transmit a first command in response to a first gesture when the identified object corresponds to a first object” in claim 1, lines 21-22. As a result, it is unclear as to whether “a gesture of the hand of the user” (i.e. “the gesture” or “the identified gesture”) is “a first gesture” or a different gesture. Also, it is unclear as to whether “a command” is “a first command” or a different command since the “gesture”, “first gesture”, “command” and “first command” interface in the claimed invention with “the identified object” in a similar and corresponding manner in the claims. Similar, indefiniteness exists in claim 11. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID D DAVIS whose telephone number is (571)272-7572. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. - 4 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at 571-272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID D DAVIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627 DDD
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 13, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 16, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737107
USER INTERFACES INTEGRATING HARDWARE BUTTONS
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12717425
Orientation Aware Smart Input Correction
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12717454
ELECTRONIC DEVICE, COVER DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR RECOGNIZING SIGNALS AND CONTROLLING A DISPLAY MODULE OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710848
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CAPACITIVE SENSING WITH SECONDARY ELECTRODES EXPOSED TO ELECTRIC FIELDS FROM A PRIMARY ELECTRODE
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12710864
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RECOGNIZING PLURALITY OF GESTURES PROVIDED VIA A PLURALITY OF TOUCH INTERFACES
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+9.3%)
3y 0m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 923 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month