Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/980,681

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING MARKERS FOR SURGICAL GUIDANCE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 13, 2024
Examiner
MCCORMACK, THOMAS S
Art Unit
2686
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Endomagnetics Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
545 granted / 683 resolved
+17.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
703
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.4%
+20.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 683 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-4, 6, 10, 11, 14,15, 17, 19, 20-24, 28, 29, and 32 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-19 of U.S. Patent No. 12,193,806. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of current invention are anticipated by the claims of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 1 of the current application corresponds to claim 1 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 2 of the current application corresponds to claim 2 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 3 of the current application corresponds to claim 3 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 4 of the current application corresponds to claim 4 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 6 of the current application corresponds to claim 5 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 10 of the current application corresponds to claim 6 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 11 of the current application corresponds to claim 7 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 14 of the current application corresponds to claim 8 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 15 of the current application corresponds to claim 9 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 17 of the current application corresponds to claim 10 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 19 of the current application corresponds to claim 11 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 20 of the current application corresponds to claim 12 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 21 of the current application corresponds to claim 13 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 22 of the current application corresponds to claim 14 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 23 of the current application corresponds to claim 15 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 24 of the current application corresponds to claim 16 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 28 of the current application corresponds to claim 17 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 29 of the current application corresponds to claim 18 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Claim 32 of the current application corresponds to claim 19 of US Patent No. 12,193,806. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS S MCCORMACK whose telephone number is (571)272-0841. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Zimmerman can be reached at (571) 272-3059. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS S MCCORMACK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2686
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 13, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602676
IMAGE-BASED USER POSE DETECTION FOR USER ACTION PREDICTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598202
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRIORITIZING LIMITED RESOURCES FOR SECURITY MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596189
METHOD FOR TRANSFERRING INFORMATION VIA A MOBILE BEACON
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588672
REPELLENCE SYSTEM AND REPELLENCE METHOD FOR REPELLING ANIMALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584938
MOTION-ACTIVATED SOUND PLAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+3.4%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 683 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month