Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/981,873

SNUBBER BRACKET

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 16, 2024
Examiner
KECK, DANIEL M
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fca US LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
223 granted / 272 resolved
+30.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
297
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
31.7%
-8.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 272 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on 12/16/2024, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a Non-Final Office Action on the merits in response to applicant’s filing from 12/16/2024. Claims 1-10 are pending and have been considered below. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/16/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 1, line 5 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the tail” should read, “the elongated tail”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 1, lines 6-7 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the battery pack” should read, “a battery pack”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 2, line 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the tail” should read, “the elongated tail”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 5, lines 1-2 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the tail” should read, “the elongated tail”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6, line 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the cradle” should read, “the rear cradle”. Appropriate correction is required. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6, line 3 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the snubber” should read, “the at least one snubber”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6, line 6 is objected to because of the following informalities: “a snubber” should read, “the at least one snubber”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6, line 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the tail” should read, “the elongated tail”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6, lines 8-9 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the battery pack” should read, “a battery pack”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 7, line 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the tail” should read, “the elongated tail”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10, line 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the tail” should read, “the elongated tail”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lent (US 2014/0087234). Regarding claim 1, Lent discloses a snubber bracket {70} comprising: a body {230 (Fig. 10)}; a reinforcing nose {392 (Fig. 10)} extending from the body {230} providing a crush zone {Figs. 6, 10} for a snubber {240: “elastomeric member 240” [0020]}; an elongated tail {220} extending from the body {230}, the tail {220} for contacting a battery extension {112 (Fig. 6)} for prohibiting contact of the snubber bracket {70} with the battery pack {40+150 (so that only snubber 240 contacts the battery pack): “The plate portion 220 is configured to be coupled to an outer surface of the second side portion 112 such that the extension portion 230 extends through the aperture 120 in the second side portion 112 and the elastomeric member 240 contacts the battery module 150 of the plurality of battery modules 40” [0020]}. Regarding claim 2, Lent discloses a step {(base portion of) 390+394 (Fig. 10)} is formed between the body {230} and the tail {220}. Regarding claim 3, Lent discloses the step {(base portion of) 390+394 (Fig. 10)} provides an additional crush zone for the snubber bracket {70}. Regarding claim 4, Lent discloses a flange {upper and lower flange portions of 230 connected to 220 by 400+402+404+410 (Fig. 10)} extends from the body {230: “The extension portion 230 includes a first leg portion 390, a second leg portion 392, and a supporting plate portion 394. The supporting plate portion 394 is disposed between and coupled to the first and second leg portions 390, 392 and is substantially perpendicular to the first and second leg portions 390, 392. The first leg portion 390 is coupled to the plate portion 220 utilizing the weld joints 400, 402, 404. The second leg portion 392 is coupled to the plate portion 220 utilizing the weld joint 410 and two other weld joints (not shown)” [0022]}. Regarding claim 5, Lent discloses a flange {upper and lower flange portions of 220 connected to 112 by 350+352+254+356+362+364+366+368+370 (Fig. 10)} extends from the tail {220: “The plate portion 220 includes the apertures 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 370, 372 extending therethrough. The apertures 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 370, 372 are configured to be aligned with the apertures 130, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 in the second side portion 112 such that screws 250, 252, 254, 256, 258, 260, 262, 264, 266, 268, 270, 272 respectively are disposed therethrough for coupling the plate portion 220 to the second side portion 112” [0021]}. Regarding claim 6, Lent discloses a vehicle {“vehicle” [0023]} comprising: a rear cradle {20+30 (112): the cradle extends along the outside of the battery modules 40+50; therefore it is a rear cradle, front cradle and side cradle for the battery modules (Figs. 1-6)} with at least one snubber {240: “elastomeric member 240” [0020]} in the cradle {20+30 (112)} and a snubber bracket {70} coupled with the snubber {240} including: a body {230}; a reinforcing nose {392 (Fig. 10)} extending from the body {230} providing a crush zone {Figs. 6, 10} for a snubber {240}; an elongated tail {220} extending from the body {230}, the tail {220} for contacting a battery extension {112 (Fig. 6)} for prohibiting contact of the snubber bracket {70} with the battery pack {40+150 (so that only snubber 240 contacts the battery pack): “The plate portion 220 is configured to be coupled to an outer surface of the second side portion 112 such that the extension portion 230 extends through the aperture 120 in the second side portion 112 and the elastomeric member 240 contacts the battery module 150 of the plurality of battery modules 40” [0020]}. Regarding claim 7, Lent discloses a step {(base portion of) 390+394 (Fig. 10)} is formed between the body {230} and the tail {220}. Regarding claim 8, Lent discloses the step {(base portion of) 390+394 (Fig. 10)} provides an additional crush zone for the snubber bracket {70}. Regarding claim 9, Lent discloses a flange {upper and lower flange portions of 230 connected to 220 by 400+402+404+410 (Fig. 10)} extends from the body {230: “The extension portion 230 includes a first leg portion 390, a second leg portion 392, and a supporting plate portion 394. The supporting plate portion 394 is disposed between and coupled to the first and second leg portions 390, 392 and is substantially perpendicular to the first and second leg portions 390, 392. The first leg portion 390 is coupled to the plate portion 220 utilizing the weld joints 400, 402, 404. The second leg portion 392 is coupled to the plate portion 220 utilizing the weld joint 410 and two other weld joints (not shown)” [0022]}. Regarding claim 10, Lent discloses a flange {upper and lower flange portions of 220 connected to 112 by 350+352+254+356+362+364+366+368+370 (Fig. 10)} extends from the tail {220: “The plate portion 220 includes the apertures 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 370, 372 extending therethrough. The apertures 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 370, 372 are configured to be aligned with the apertures 130, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 in the second side portion 112 such that screws 250, 252, 254, 256, 258, 260, 262, 264, 266, 268, 270, 272 respectively are disposed therethrough for coupling the plate portion 220 to the second side portion 112” [0021]}. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Daniel M Keck whose telephone number is (571)272-5947. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:00-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason Shanske can be reached on (571)270-5985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Daniel M. Keck/Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3614
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673743
CONTROL SYSTEM, STRADDLE TYPE VEHICLE, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12643361
ACTIVE SPRING UNIT
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12638076
OFF-HIGHWAY RECREATIONAL VEHICLE
1y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630111
SEATBELT ASSEMBLY INCLUDING SEATBELT PAD
2y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623733
LOAD BALANCING SYSTEMS AND METHODS, AND SELF-BALANCING TRAILERS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.7%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 272 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month