Prosecution Insights
Last updated: November 03, 2026
Application No. 18/982,163

MEDICAL SEAL ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 16, 2024
Priority
May 19, 2020 — provisional 63/027,223 +1 more
Examiner
SURGAN, ALEXANDRA L
Art Unit
3799
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Boston Scientific Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
247 granted / 518 resolved
-22.3% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
556
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
61.9%
+21.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 518 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of species a in the reply filed on 08/21/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Status of Claims Claims 1-20 are pending and currently under consideration for patentability under 37 CFR 1.104 Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/16/2024, 02/10/2026, and 08/06/2026 have been considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the cap assembly having a plurality of perforations and also first and second reservoir, the second reservoir is aligned with the imaging device such that the imaging device is able to capture images distally of the cap through a distal face of the cap, and wherein the first reservoir is misaligned from the imaging device, such that the imaging device is isolated from the material stored in the first reservoir (claim 9, 14) must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5-8, 10-12 and 16-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Piskun (US 2016/0374658). With respect to claim 1, Piskun teaches a medical device, comprising: a shaft (1055) having a distal end, wherein the distal end includes an opening and an imaging device (315 for example); a cap assembly (1098,1099) at the distal end of the shaft, wherein the cap assembly defines a reservoir (FIG. 10B for example) for storing a material (1051,1052,1053,1054), wherein, in a first configuration, the cap assembly includes a plurality of perforations formed in an outer body of the cap assembly (para [0198]), the plurality of perforations being sized such that the material is retained within the reservoir (FIG. 10B for example), wherein, in transitioning from the first configuration of the cap assembly to a second configuration of the cap assembly, the plurality of perforations form at least one opening that is sized such that the material is ejected through the at least one opening (FIG. 10E for example). That is, Piskun et al. teaches multiple embodiments and further teaches the systems taught herein can include any combination of components (para [0123]). With respect to claim 2, Piskun teaches the cap assembly includes a deployment mechanism (1070/1075), and wherein movement of the deployment mechanism causes the material to exert a force on the plurality of perforations to form the at least one opening (para [0143],[0150]). With respect to claim 5, Piskun teaches as the cap assembly transitions from the first configuration to the second configuration, an area of the outer body between adjacent perforations of the plurality of perforations breaks to form the at least one opening (FIG. 10E). With respect to claim 6, Piskun teaches breaking of the area of the outer body between the adjacent perforations causes the adjacent perforations to combine to form the at least one opening (FIG. 10E). With respect to claim 7, Piskun teaches the area of the outer body between the adjacent perforations is a weakened portion (para [0198]). With respect to claim 8, Piskun does not specifically teach the weakened portion includes a biodegradable or a bioabsorbable material. However, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify material of the perforations since there are a finite number of predictable potential materials such that one of ordinary skill in the art could have pursued a biodegradable or a bioabsorbable material with a reasonable expectation of success. With respect to claim 10, Piskun teaches a medical device, comprising: a shaft (1055) having a distal end, wherein the distal end includes an opening and an imaging device (315 for example); a cap assembly (1098,1099) at the distal end of the shaft, wherein the cap assembly defines a reservoir (FIG. 10B for example) for storing a material (1051,1052,1053,1054) and includes a deployment mechanism (1070/1075) configured to apply force to the material ((para [0143],[0150])); wherein application of a sufficient force to the material within the reservoir causes adjacent perforations of a plurality of perforations in the cap assembly to combine to form an opening for ejecting the material (para [0198], see also FIG. 10E). That is, Piskun et al. teaches multiple embodiments and further teaches the systems taught herein can include any combination of components (para [0123]). With respect to claim 11, Piskun teaches an area between the adjacent perforations is a weakened portion configured to break upon application of the sufficient force (para [0198]). With respect to claim 12, Piskun does not teach a specific size of the perforations. However, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the size of the perforations since there are a finite number of predictable potential perforation sizes such that one of ordinary skill in the art could have pursued a perforation size of 0.001 inches to approximately 0.010 inches with a reasonable expectation of success. With respect to claim 16, Piskun teaches a medical device, comprising: a shaft (1055) having a distal end, wherein the distal end includes an opening and an imaging device (315 for example); a cap assembly (1098,1099) at the distal end of the shaft, wherein the cap assembly defines a reservoir (FIG. 10B for example) for storing a material (1051,1052,1053,1054); wherein, to eject the material from the cap assembly, a plurality of perforations of the cap assembly combine to form an opening as portions of a body of the cap assembly between adjacent perforations of the plurality of perforations break (para [0198], FIG. 10E). With respect to claim 17, Piskun teaches the portions of the body of the cap assembly between the adjacent perforations include weakened portions (para [0198]). With respect to claim 18, Piskun teaches individual perforations of the plurality of perforations are sized so as to retain the material within the reservoir before the plurality of perforations combine to form the opening (FIG. 10A vs 10E). With respect to claim 19, Piskun teaches the opening is sized so as to allow the material to exit through the opening (FIG. 10E). With respect to claim 20, Piskun teaches activation of a deployment mechanism exerts a force on the material, causing the material to exert a pressure on the body of the cap assembly to cause the portions of the cap assembly between the adjacent perforations to break (FIG. 10A vs 10E). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 4, 9, and 13-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alexandra Newton Surgan whose telephone number is (571)270-1618. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Carey can be reached at (571) 270-7235. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ALEXANDRA L. SURGAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3795 /ALEXANDRA L NEWTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12773094
ENDOSCOPE
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 27, 2026
Patent 12765754
ENDOSCOPE HAVING AN ADJUSTABLE BRAKING MECHANISM
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12745896
ENDOSCOPE AND METHOD OF USE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12727951
ROBOTIC BRONCHOSCOPY NAVIGATION METHOD AND SYSTEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721642
Extendable Ureteroscope Sheath
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+28.6%)
3y 11m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 518 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month