Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/982,282

IMAGER AND IMAGE READING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 16, 2024
Priority
Dec 26, 2023 — JP 2023-220072
Examiner
MILIA, MARK R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
PFU Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
358 granted / 608 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
615
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§103
61.6%
+21.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 608 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-6, 8, and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sugiyama (US 2018/0309896), cited in the IDS dated 12/16/24. Regarding claim 1, Sugiyama discloses an imager comprising: an imaging circuit board including a hole (see Fig. 1 and paras 39, 47, and 64, image sensor unit 1 includes sensor substrate 15 that includes a wiring board 152, the sensor substrate 15 includes holes); a frame including a projection that includes a base and an end portion projecting from the hole (see Fig. 1 and paras 44-45, 55, 68, and 73, housing 10 includes attachments protrusions to connecting a rigid member 4, substrate 15, light guide 12 and light guide cover 13); and a restrictor located between the end portion and the hole, wherein the restrictor includes an opening through which the base passes (see Fig. 5 and paras 55-56, 58-61, 69-69, and 78, fitting protrusions 44 are restrictors that are located between the housing 10 and the rigid member 4), wherein the imaging circuit board is fixed to the frame by the end portion and the restrictor, and the opening is smaller than the hole in a main scanning direction of the imaging circuit board (see Figs. 1 and 5 and paras 74-75 and 78, sensor substrate 15 is fixed to housing 10 via fitting protrusions). Regarding claim 3, Sugiyama further discloses wherein the restrictor includes paper, metal, or resin (see paras 59 and 61, the protrusions are resin). Regarding claim 4, Sugiyama further discloses wherein clearance between the hole and the base is larger in the main scanning direction than in a sub-scanning direction in the imaging circuit board (see paras 60, 63, 68, and 73, clearance is larger in the main scanning direction than in the sub-scanning direction). Regarding claim 5, Sugiyama further discloses an image reading apparatus comprising the imager according to claim 1; and control circuitry configured to control imaging operation performed by the imager (see para 64, image sensor unit 1 is assembled in an image reading apparatus 7). Regarding claim 6, Sugiyama discloses an imager comprising: an imaging circuit board including a hole (see Fig. 1 and paras 39, 47, and 64, image sensor unit 1 includes sensor substrate 15 that includes a wiring board 152, the sensor substrate 15 includes holes); and a frame including a projection that includes a base and an end portion projecting from the hole (see Fig. 1 and paras 44-45, 55, 68, and 73, housing 10 includes attachments protrusions to connecting a rigid member 4, substrate 15, light guide 12 and light guide cover 13), wherein the end portion is longer than the base in a sub-scanning direction of the imaging circuit board and is equal to or shorter than the base in a main scanning direction of the imaging circuit board (see Fig. 1), and the imaging circuit board is fixed to the frame by the end portion in the sub-scanning direction (see paras 44-45, 55, 59-61, 68, 73, and 78, sensor substrate 15 is fixed to housing 10 via fitting protrusions). Regarding claim 8, Sugiyama further discloses wherein clearance between the hole and the base is larger in the main scanning direction than in the sub-scanning direction (see paras 60, 63, 68, and 73, clearance is larger in the main scanning direction than in the sub-scanning direction). Regarding claim 9, Sugiyama further discloses an image reading apparatus comprising: the imager according to claim 6; and control circuitry configured to control imaging operation performed by the imager (see para 64, image sensor unit 1 is assembled in an image reading apparatus 7). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sugiyama as applied to claims 1 and 6 above, and further in view of Shishido (JP 2013-171963), reference will be made to the provided machine translation. Sugiyama does not disclose expressly wherein the restrictor restricts a part of the end portion that is melted from flowing into the hole. Shishido discloses wherein the restrictor restricts a part of the end portion that is melted from flowing into the hole (see page 4, paras 5-10, resist regions prevent solder from flowing into holes 16 of the printed circuit board 10). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to combine the resist regions, as described by Shishido, with the system of Sugiyama. The suggestion/motivation for doing so would have been to prevent the possibility of contact and short circuit (Shishido page 2 para 1). Therefore, it would have been obvious to combine Shishido with Sugiyama to obtain the invention as specified in claims 2 and 7. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARK R MILIA whose telephone number is (571) 272-7408. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Akwasi Sarpong can be reached at 571-270-3438. The fax number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARK R MILIA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2681
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743599
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743242
IMAGE FORMATION APPARATUS, IMAGE FORMATION METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739328
METHODS, APPARATUSES, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR CALIBRATING RADIO-FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) PRINTERS
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732581
IMAGE READING APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12714401
SHEAR WAVE PHASE VELOCITY ESTIMATION WITH EXTENDED BANDWIDTH USING GENERALIZED STOCKWELL TRANSFORM AND SLANT FREQUENCY WAVENUMBER ANALYSIS
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+22.2%)
3y 4m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 608 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month