Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/982,302

Component Control Method for Device and Related Apparatus

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 16, 2024
Examiner
CHEUNG, CALVIN K
Art Unit
3669
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Shenzhen Yinwang Intelligent Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
832 granted / 950 resolved
+35.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
971
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§103
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 950 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED CORRESPONDENCE Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 2-10, and 14-20 is/are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Priority Status Foreign priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d) is acknowledged. Status of Claims Preliminary Amended Claim(s) 1-20 is/are examined in this office action. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, and 11-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 20220212628 A1 (“Xie”). Claim 1 is directed to the same invention as Claim 11 and also repeats the same subject matter; therefore, Claim 1 is rejected in like manner. As to Claim 2, Xie discloses: wherein the authentication result is the authentication success (see at least Fig. 1-5 with associated text), and wherein obtaining the authentication result comprises: receiving an authentication success notification from the second controller (see at least Fig. 1-5 with associated text), wherein the authentication success notification notifies the device that the authentication performed by the second controller on the first controller has succeeded (see at least Fig. 1-5 with associated text). As to Claim 11, Xie discloses A component control apparatus (e.g., vehicle authentication system; see at least Abstract) comprising: a memory configured to store a computer program (see at least [0086]); and at least one processor coupled to the memory, and configured to execute the computer program to cause the component control apparatus to (see at least [0085]): obtain a control instruction (“unlocking the vehicle door”; “trunk open”; and/or “vehicle starting”) from a first controller (e.g., “central control processor 100”), when authentication performed by a second controller (e.g.,” AVNT smart interconnection device 110” and/or “fingerprint authentication controller 120”) on the first controller succeeds and when trusting an authentication result of the authentication (see at least [0061]-[0078], and Fig. 1-5 with associated text; in particular, S409 and/or S509); obtain the authentication result, wherein the authentication result comprises an authentication success (see at least Fig. 1-5 with associated text; in particular, S409 and/or S509) or (Only one option is required to satisfy an “or” limitation.) an authentication failure (see at least Fig. 1-5 with associated text; in particular, S408 and/or S508); and respond to the control instruction when the authentication result is the authentication success (see at least Fig. 1-5 with associated text; in particular, S409 and/or S509). Claim 12 is directed to the same invention as Claim 11 and also repeats the same subject matter; therefore, Claim 12 is rejected in like manner. Claim 13 repeats the same subject matter of Claim 2; therefore, Claim 2 is rejected in like manner. Communications via The Internet and Authorization MPEP § 502.03 II, “Without a written authorization by applicant in place, the USPTO will not respond via Internet email to any Internet correspondence which contains information subject to the confidentiality requirement as set forth in 35 U.S.C. 122. A paper copy of such correspondence and response will be placed in the appropriate patent application by the examiner. except for correspondence that only sets up an interview time, all correspondence between the office and the applicant including applicant’s representative must be placed in the appropriate patent application. If an email contains any information beyond scheduling an interview, such as an interview agenda, it must be placed in the application. THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION MAY BE SUBMITTED VIA EFS-WEB, MAIL, OR FAX. It cannot be submitted by email.” Contact Information Primary Examiner Calvin Cheung’s contact information is listed at the bottom, and he is typically reached MONDAY-THURSDAY, 0700-1700 ET. If attempts to reach the primary by telephone are unsuccessful, the primary’s supervisor, HELAL ALGAHAIM, is available at telephone number (571) 270-5227. Applicants are encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice for scheduling an examiner interview that will be performed over telephone or video conferencing (using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool). Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CALVIN CHEUNG/ Direct Office Number (571) 270-7041 Email and Fax send to Calvin.Cheung@USPTO.GOV
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12591252
CONTROL SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587410
AUTOMOTIVE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH ETHERNET RING TOPOLOGY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579847
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ONE TO MANY VEHICLE BROADCAST HANDLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571902
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMMUNICATING WITH VEHICLES USING RADAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12562666
ACTUATOR DRIVING DEVICE AND STEERING SYSTEM PROVIDED WITH THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 950 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month