Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/982,307

POSTURE-BASED CONTROL OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION THERAPY

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 16, 2024
Priority
Dec 19, 2019 — continuation of 11/202,912 +2 more
Examiner
STICE, PAULA J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Medtronic Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1136 granted / 1387 resolved
+21.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1408
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§103
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1387 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: paragraph 0001 needs to be updated to reflect the status of US Patent Application Number 18/482,657 which is now issued as US Patent No. 12,168,131. Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 3-8, 10-11, 13-18 and 20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-17 and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,168,131. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other as shown below and illustrated by the underlined portions of the claims. There are minor claim wording changes between the two cases, however a terminal disclaimer is necessary to expedite prosecution. Current Application No. 18/982,307 US Patent No. 12,168,131 Claim 1 A system comprising: memory configured to store evoked compound action potential (ECAP) information associated with a plurality of postures; and processing circuitry configured to: determine, based on information from one or more sensors, a posture of the plurality of postures of a patient; identify, from the ECAP information stored in the memory, a subset of ECAP information associated with the determined posture; select, based on the detected posture and the subset of ECAP information, a value of a target ECAP characteristic; compare the value of the target ECAP characteristic to a value of a characteristic of an ECAP signal elicited by a first stimulation pulse delivered to the patient of a plurality of first stimulation pulses, the plurality of first stimulation pulses being at least partially interleaved with a plurality of second stimulation pulses, wherein at least one parameter value defining the plurality of first stimulation pulses is different than parameter values defining the plurality of second stimulation pulses, and wherein sensing circuitry is configured to detect the ECAP signal elicited by at least some of the plurality of first stimulation pulses instead of any ECAP signals elicited by the plurality of second stimulation pulses; select, based on the comparison, a value of a parameter at least partially defining delivery of one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses of the plurality of first stimulation pulses to the patient; and control delivery of the one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses according to the value of the parameter. Claim 9 A system comprising: memory configured to store evoked compound action potential (ECAP) information associated with a plurality of postures; and processing circuitry configured to: determine, based on information from one or more sensors, a posture of the plurality of postures of a patient; identify, from the ECAP information stored in the memory, a subset of ECAP information associated with the determined posture; select, based on the detected posture and the subset of ECAP information, a value of a target ECAP characteristic; compare the value of the target ECAP characteristic to a value of a characteristic of an ECAP signal elicited by a first stimulation pulse delivered to the patient, the first stimulation pulse being interleaved with a plurality of second stimulation pulses, wherein at least one parameter value defining the first stimulation pulse is different than parameter values defining the plurality of second stimulation pulses, and wherein sensing circuitry is configured to detect the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse instead of any ECAP signals elicited by the plurality of second stimulation pulses; select adjust, based on the comparison, a value of a parameter at least partially defining delivery of one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses of the plurality of second stimulation pulses to the patient; and control delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses according to the value of the parameter. Claim 3 The system of claim 1, further comprising: one or more sensors configured to generate the information that is representative of the posture of the plurality of postures of the patient; and sensing circuitry configured to sense the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse delivered to the patient, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to receive the ECAP signal from the sensing circuitry. Claim 10 The system of claim 9, further comprising one or more sensors configured to generate the information that is representative of the posture of the plurality of postures of the patient. Claim 11 The system of claim 9, further comprising sensing circuitry configured to sense the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse delivered to the patient, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to receive the ECAP signal from the sensing circuitry. Claim 4 The system of claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to compare the value of the target ECAP characteristic to the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse by at least determining that the value of the target ECAP characteristic is greater than the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse, and wherein the processing circuitry is configured to select, based on the comparison, the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient by at least increasing the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses to the patient. Claim 12 The system of claim 9, wherein comparing the value of the target ECAP characteristic to the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse comprises determining that the value of the target ECAP characteristic is greater than the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse, and wherein selecting, based on the comparison, the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient comprises increasing the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient. Claim 5 The system of claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to: compare the value of the target ECAP characteristic to the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse by at least determining that the value of the target ECAP characteristic is less than the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse, and select, based on the comparison, the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses to the patient by at least decreasing the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses to the patient. Claim 13 The system of claim 9, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to: compare the value of the target ECAP characteristic to the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse by at least determining that the value of the target ECAP characteristic is less than the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse, and select, based on the comparison, the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient by at least decreasing the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient. Claim 6 The system of claim 1, wherein the parameter at least partially defining the delivery of the one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses comprises one of a current amplitude, pulse width, a voltage amplitude, or a frequency of the one or more stimulation pulses. Claim 14 The system of claim 9, wherein the parameter at least partially defining the delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses comprises one of a current amplitude, pulse width, a voltage amplitude, or a frequency of the one or more stimulation pulses. Claim 7 The system of claim 1, wherein the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the second stimulation pulse comprises an amplitude of at least a portion of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse. Claim 15 The system of claim 9, wherein the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse comprises an amplitude of at least a portion of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse. Claim 8 The system of claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to select the value of the target ECAP characteristic by at least: selecting, based on the detected posture, an ECAP growth curve of a plurality of ECAP growth curves, wherein each ECAP growth curve of the plurality of ECAP growth curves is associated with at least one posture of the plurality of postures, and wherein each ECAP growth curve of the plurality of ECAP growth curves defines a relationship between the parameter defining delivery of one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient and a characteristic of an ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse; selecting, based on the selected ECAP growth curve, the value of the target ECAP characteristic. Claim 16 The system of claim 9, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to select the value of the target ECAP characteristic by at least: selecting, based on the detected posture, an ECAP growth curve of a plurality of ECAP growth curves, wherein each ECAP growth curve of the plurality of ECAP growth curves is associated with at least one posture of the plurality of postures, and wherein each ECAP growth curve of the plurality of ECAP growth curves defines a relationship between the parameter defining delivery of one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient and a characteristic of an ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse; selecting, based on the selected ECAP growth curve, the value of the target ECAP characteristic. Claim 10 The system of claim 1, further comprising an implantable medical device comprising the processing circuitry and therapy delivery circuitry configured to deliver therapy to the patient, wherein the therapy comprises at least one of the plurality of first stimulation pulses or the plurality of second stimulation pulses. Claim 17 The system of claim 9, further comprising an implantable medical device comprising the processing circuitry and therapy delivery circuitry configured to deliver therapy to the patient, wherein the therapy comprises the plurality of second stimulation pulses. Claim 11 A method comprising: determining, by processing circuitry and based on information from one or more sensors, a posture of a plurality of postures of a patient; identifying, by the processing circuitry, stored evoked compound action potential (ECAP) information associated with the determined posture; selecting, by the processing circuitry and based on the detected posture and the identified ECAP information, a value of a target ECAP characteristic; comparing, by the processing circuitry, the value of the target ECAP characteristic to a value of a characteristic of an ECAP signal elicited by a first stimulation pulse delivered to the patient of a plurality of first stimulation pulses, the plurality of first stimulation pulses being at least partially interleaved with a plurality of second stimulation pulses, wherein at least one parameter value defining the plurality of first stimulation pulses is different than parameter values defining the plurality of second stimulation pulses, and wherein sensing circuitry is configured to detect the ECAP signal elicited by at least some of the plurality of first stimulation pulses instead of any ECAP signals elicited by the plurality of second stimulation pulses; selecting, by the processing circuitry and based on the comparison, a value of a parameter at least partially defining delivery of one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses of the plurality of first stimulation pulses to the patient; and controlling, by the processing circuitry, delivery of the one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses according to the value of the parameter. Claim 1 A method comprising: determining, by processing circuitry and based on information from one or more sensors, a posture of a plurality of postures of a patient; identifying, by the processing circuitry, stored evoked compound action potential (ECAP) information associated with the determined posture; selecting, by the processing circuitry and based on the detected posture and the identified ECAP information, a value of a target ECAP characteristic; comparing, by the processing circuitry, the value of the target ECAP characteristic to a value of a characteristic of an ECAP signal elicited by a first stimulation pulse delivered to the patient, the first stimulation pulse being interleaved with a plurality of second stimulation pulses, wherein at least one parameter value defining the first stimulation pulse is different than parameter values defining the plurality of second stimulation pulses, and wherein sensing circuitry is configured to detect the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse instead of any ECAP signals elicited by the plurality of second stimulation pulses; adjusting, by the processing circuitry and based on the comparison, a value of a parameter at least partially defining delivery of one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses of the plurality of second stimulation pulses to the patient; and controlling, by the processing circuitry, delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses according to the value of the parameter. Claim 13 The method of claim 11, further comprising: generating, by one or more sensors, the information that is representative of the posture of the plurality of postures of the patient; and sensing, by sensing circuitry, the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse delivered to the patient, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to receive the ECAP signal from the sensing circuitry. Claim 2 The method of claim 1, further comprising generating, by the one or more sensors, the information that is representative of the posture of the plurality of postures of the patient. Claim 3 The method of claim 1, further comprising: sensing, by sensing circuitry, the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse delivered to the patient; and receiving, by the processing circuitry, the ECAP signal. Claim 14 The method of claim 11, wherein comparing the value of the target ECAP characteristic to the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse comprises determining that the value of the target ECAP characteristic is greater than the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse, and wherein selecting, based on the comparison, the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient comprises increasing the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses to the patient. Claim 4 The method of claim 1, wherein comparing the value of the target ECAP characteristic to the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse comprises determining that the value of the target ECAP characteristic is greater than the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse, and wherein selecting, based on the comparison, the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient comprises increasing the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient. Claim 15 The method of claim 11, further comprising: comparing the value of the target ECAP characteristic to the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse by at least determining that the value of the target ECAP characteristic is less than the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse, and selecting, based on the comparison, the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses to the patient by at least decreasing the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses to the patient. Claim 5 The method of claim 1, wherein comparing the value of the target ECAP characteristic to the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse comprises determining that the value of the target ECAP characteristic is less than the value of the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse, and wherein selecting, based on the comparison, the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient comprises decreasing the value for the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient. Claim 16 The method of claim 11, wherein the parameter at least partially defining the delivery of the one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses comprises one of a current amplitude, pulse width, a voltage amplitude, or a frequency of the one or more stimulation pulses. Claim 6 The method of claim 1, wherein the parameter at least partially defining the delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses comprises one of a current amplitude, pulse width, a voltage amplitude, or a frequency of the one or more second stimulation pulses. Claim 17 The method of claim 11, wherein the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the second stimulation pulse comprises an amplitude of at least a portion of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse. Claim 7 The method of claim 1, wherein the characteristic of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse comprises an amplitude of at least a portion of the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse. Claim 18 The system of claim 1, wherein selecting the value of the target ECAP characteristic comprises: selecting, based on the detected posture, an ECAP growth curve of a plurality of ECAP growth curves, wherein each ECAP growth curve of the plurality of ECAP growth curves is associated with at least one posture of the plurality of postures, and wherein each ECAP growth curve of the plurality of ECAP growth curves defines a relationship between the parameter defining delivery of one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient and a characteristic of an ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse; selecting, based on the selected ECAP growth curve, the value of the target ECAP characteristic. Claim 8 The method of claim 1, wherein selecting the value of the target ECAP characteristic comprises: selecting, based on the detected posture, an ECAP growth curve of a plurality of ECAP growth curves, wherein each ECAP growth curve of the plurality of ECAP growth curves is associated with at least one posture of the plurality of postures, and wherein each ECAP growth curve of the plurality of ECAP growth curves defines a relationship between the parameter defining delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses to the patient and a characteristic of an ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse; selecting, based on the selected ECAP growth curve, the value of the target ECAP characteristic. Claim 20: A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed, cause processing circuitry of a medical device to: determine, based on information from one or more sensors, a posture of the plurality of postures of a patient; identify, from ECAP information stored in a memory, a subset of ECAP information associated with the determined posture; select, based on the detected posture and the subset of ECAP information, a value of a target ECAP characteristic; compare the value of the target ECAP characteristic to a value of a characteristic of an ECAP signal elicited by a first stimulation pulse delivered to the patient of a plurality of first stimulation pulses, the plurality of first stimulation pulses being at least partially interleaved with a plurality of second stimulation pulses, wherein at least one parameter value defining the plurality of first stimulation pulses is different than parameter values defining the plurality of second stimulation pulses, and wherein sensing circuitry is configured to detect the ECAP signal elicited by at least some of the plurality of first stimulation pulses instead of any ECAP signals elicited by the plurality of second stimulation pulses; select, based on the comparison, a value of a parameter at least partially defining delivery of one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses of the plurality of first stimulation pulses to the patient; and control delivery of the one or more subsequent first stimulation pulses according to the value of the parameter. Claim 18. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed, cause processing circuitry of a medical device to: determine, based on information from one or more sensors, a posture of a plurality of postures of a patient; identify stored evoked compound action potential (ECAP) information associated with the determined posture; select, based on the detected posture and the identified ECAP information, a value of a target ECAP characteristic; compare the value of the target ECAP characteristic to a value of a characteristic of an ECAP signal elicited by a first stimulation pulse delivered to the patient, the first stimulation pulse being interleaved with a plurality of second stimulation pulses, wherein at least one parameter value defining the first stimulation pulse is different than parameter values defining the plurality of second stimulation pulses, and wherein sensing circuitry is configured to detect the ECAP signal elicited by the first stimulation pulse instead of any ECAP signals elicited by the plurality of second stimulation pulses; select adjust, based on the comparison, a value of a parameter at least partially defining delivery of one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses of the plurality of second stimulation pulses to the patient; and control delivery of the one or more subsequent second stimulation pulses according to the value of the parameter. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 9, 12 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The invention is directed towards a method, system and non-transitory computer readable medium. The invention includes sensors to determine posture positions of a patient, identifying ECAP information associated with each posture and selecting a target ECAP characteristic. The prior art fails to disclose or render obvious all of the limitations of the independent claims in combination with interleaving a stimulation pulse(s), and the sensing circuitry detecting the ECAP elicited by the certain pulses but not all stimulation pulse(s). Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Paula J. Stice whose telephone number is (303)297-4352. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30am -4pm MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Klein can be reached at 571-272-5213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PAULA J. STICE Primary Examiner Art Unit 3796 /PAULA J STICE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734369
CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION, TREATMENT, AND ANALYSIS
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728268
CLOUD BASED NEUROSTIMULATION PROGRAMMING OPTIMIZATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728276
Implantable System and Method for Providing Anti-Tachycardia and/or Shock Therapy
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722008
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR RESTORATION OF BRAIN NETWORK ACTIVITY
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722000
Implantable Cardiac Electrode
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.8%)
2y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1387 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month