Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/983,238

WORK VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Dec 16, 2024
Examiner
RESTIFO, JEFFREY J
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kubota Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
841 granted / 1062 resolved
+27.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1077
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
39.4%
-0.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1062 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 20 recites the limitation “allowable bending radius”, which is considered indefinite, since it is not known as what a non-allowable radius would be. Correction required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Uno et al. (US 8,899,371 B2) and in further view of Yasuda et al. (US 9,945,398 B2). With respect to claim 1, Uno et al. discloses a work vehicle comprising body frame 3 with left and right sidewalls 21, 22, first and second hydraulic motors 18, 19, hydraulic pump 17, and first and second hydraulic hoses 51, 53, each hose having a port on the pump and a port on one of said motors, as shown in figure 3. Uno et al. does not disclose a pair of hydraulic pumps. Yasuda et al. does disclose a work vehicle with a pair of pumps 31L, 31R, as shown in figure 2. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the second hydraulic pump of Yasuda et al. into the hydraulic drive of Uno et al. in order to have a separate pump for each motor. PNG media_image1.png 472 650 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 453 633 media_image2.png Greyscale With respect to claim 2, said hoses 51, 53 pass through a gap between said left and right walls 21, 22, as shown in figure 3 of Uno et al. With respect to claim 20 (as best understood), the distance between the ports of the hydraulic motors appears to be shorter than a bending radius of the hoses, as shown in figure 3 of Uno et al. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFREY J RESTIFO whose telephone number is (571)272-6697. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11am-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, J. Allen Shriver can be reached at (303) 297-4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JEFFREY J. RESTIFO Primary Examiner Art Unit 3613 /JEFFREY J RESTIFO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Sep 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 18, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741544
VEHICLE BODY LOWER STRUCTURE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734907
ELECTRICALLY DRIVEN WORK MACHINE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735086
VERTICALLY-MOVABLE, TRANSMISSION-FRIENDLY, AND CONTROLLABLE STROLLER
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728858
SYSTEM FOR BRAKING AN ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12719127
BATTERY CASE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.6%)
2y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1062 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month