Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/983,463

RADIO FREQUENCY CIRCUIT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Priority
Jun 21, 2022 — JP 2022-099745 +1 more
Examiner
PHAM, TUAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
817 granted / 992 resolved
+22.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
1007
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
55.8%
+15.8% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 992 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Introduction This is a response to the applicant’s filing filed on 12/17/2024. In virtue of this filing, claims 1-20 are currently presented in the instant application. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/17/2024 and 01/31/2025 has been considered by Examiner and made of record in the application file. Drawings The drawing submitted on 12/17/2024 has been considered by Examiner and made of record in the application file. Specification The specification submitted on 12/17/2024 has been considered by Examiner and made of record in the application file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lin et al. (US Pub. No.: 2016/0373064, hereinafter, “Lin”). Regarding claim 1, Lin teaches a radio frequency circuit configured to support a first power class and a second power class whose maximum output power is lower than a maximum output power of the first power class, the radio frequency circuit comprising (see figures 4A and 8, [0010, 0061, 0075, 0077, 0100-0102], high power class 1.5 BT and low power class 2 BT): a first power amplifier (see figure 4A, BT PA 310); and a variable load matching circuit connected to an output end of the first power amplifier (see figure 4A, tunable load impedance 440, [0075]), wherein under a condition that the first power class is applied, a first power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier, and a load impedance viewed from the first power amplifier is adjusted to a first impedance by the variable load matching circuit (see figures 4A and 8, [0010, 0061, 0075, 0077, 0100-0102], high power class 1.5, 3.3V power supply, 50 ohm impedance), under a condition that the second power class is applied, a second power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier, and the load impedance viewed from the first power amplifier is adjusted to a second impedance by the variable load matching circuit (see figures 4A and 8, [0010, 0061, 0075, 0077, 0100-0102], low power class 2, 1.3V power supply, 80 ohm impedance), the first power supply voltage is higher than the second power supply voltage (see figures 4A and 8, [0010, 0061, 0075, 0077, 0100-0102], high power class 1.5, 3.3V power supply, low power class 2, 1.3V power supply), and the first impedance is lower than the second impedance (see [0010, 0061, 0075, 0077, 0100-0102], 50 ohm, 80 ohm). Regarding claim 2, Lin further teaches the first power amplifier is further configured to support a third power class whose maximum output power is lower than the maximum output power of the first power class and is higher than the maximum output power of the second power class, and under a condition that the third power class is applied, the second power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier, and the load impedance viewed from the first power amplifier is adjusted to the first impedance by the variable load matching circuit (see figures 4A and 8, [0010, 0061, 0075, 0077, 0100-0102], 2.2V, 1.3V, 3.3V). Regarding claim 17, Lin further teaches the first power amplifier is further configured to support a third power class whose maximum output power is lower than the maximum output power of the first power class and is higher than the maximum output power of the second power class (see figures 4A and 8, [0010, 0061, 0075, 0077, 0100-0102], 2.2V, 1.3V, 3.3V). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-16 and 19-20 are allowed. Claims 3-10 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 11, the prior art made of record fails to clearly teach or fairly suggest the feature wherein under a condition that the first power class is applied, a first power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier, and the first filter is connected to the first power amplifier by the switch circuit, under a condition that the second power class is applied, a second power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier, and the second filter is connected to the first power amplifier by the switch circuit, and an input impedance of the first filter is lower than an input impedance of the second filter, as specified in the claim 11, and further limitations of their respective dependent claims 12-16 and 19-20. Regarding claim 3, the prior art made of record fails to clearly teach or fairly suggest the feature of the variable load matching circuit includes: a first capacitor and a first switch connected in series between the first power amplifier and an antenna connection terminal; and a second capacitor and a second switch connected in parallel to the first capacitor and the first switch, between the first power amplifier and the antenna connection terminal, the second capacitor and the second switch being connected in series, a capacitance of the first capacitor is greater than a capacitance of the second capacitor, under the condition that the first power class is applied, the first switch is closed, and the second switch is open, and under the condition that the second power class is applied, the first switch is open, and the second switch is closed. Regarding claim 4, the prior art made of record fails to clearly teach or fairly suggest the feature of the variable load matching circuit includes: a first inductor connected between the first power amplifier and an antenna connection terminal; a second inductor and a first switch connected in parallel to the first inductor, between the first power amplifier and the antenna connection terminal, the second inductor and the first switch being connected in series; a first capacitor connected between ground and a path between the first power amplifier and the antenna connection terminal; and a second capacitor and a second switch connected in parallel to the first capacitor, between the ground and the path between the first power amplifier and the antenna connection terminal, the second capacitor and the second switch being connected in series, under the condition that the first power class is applied, the first switch is open, and the second switch is closed, and under the condition that the second power class is applied, the first switch is closed, and the second switch is open. Regarding claim 5, the prior art made of record fails to clearly teach or fairly suggest the feature of a second power amplifier; and a transformer that includes a primary coil and a secondary coil, the primary coil including two ends one of which is connected to the output end of the first power amplifier and a remaining one of which is connected to an output end of the second power amplifier, the secondary coil including an end connected to the variable load matching circuit, wherein under the condition that the first power class is applied, the first power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier, and a load impedance viewed from the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier is adjusted to the first impedance by the variable load matching circuit, and under the condition that the second power class is applied, the second power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier, and the load impedance viewed from the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier is adjusted to the second impedance by the variable load matching circuit. Regarding claim 6, the prior art made of record fails to clearly teach or fairly suggest the feature of a second power amplifier; and a transformer that includes a primary coil and a secondary coil, the primary coil including two ends one of which is connected to the output end of the first power amplifier and a remaining one of which is connected to an output end of the second power amplifier, the secondary coil including an end connected to the variable load matching circuit, wherein under the condition that the first power class is applied, the first power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier, and a load impedance viewed from the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier is adjusted to the first impedance by the variable load matching circuit, and under the condition that the second power class is applied, the second power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier, the load impedance viewed from the first power amplifier is adjusted to the second impedance by the variable load matching circuit, and operation of the second power amplifier is halted. Regarding claim 8, the prior art made of record fails to clearly teach or fairly suggest the feature of a second power amplifier; a first transfer line connected between the output end of the first power amplifier and the variable load matching circuit; a second transfer line connected between an output end of the second power amplifier and the variable load matching circuit; and a resistor connected in parallel to the first transfer line and the second transfer line, between the output end of the first power amplifier and the output end of the second power amplifier, wherein under the condition that the first power class is applied, the first power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier, and a load impedance viewed from the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier is adjusted to the first impedance by the variable load matching circuit, and under the condition that the second power class is applied, the second power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier, and the load impedance viewed from the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier is adjusted to the second impedance by the variable load matching circuit. Regarding claim 9, the prior art made of record fails to clearly teach or fairly suggest the feature of a second power amplifier; a first transfer line connected between the output end of the first power amplifier and the variable load matching circuit; a second transfer line connected between an output end of the second power amplifier and the variable load matching circuit; and a resistor connected in parallel to the first transfer line and the second transfer line, between the output end of the first power amplifier and the output end of the second power amplifier, wherein under the condition that the first power class is applied, the first power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier, and a load impedance viewed from the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier is adjusted to the first impedance by the variable load matching circuit, and under the condition that the second power class is applied, the second power supply voltage is supplied to the first power amplifier, the load impedance viewed from the first power amplifier is adjusted to the second impedance by the variable load matching circuit, and operation of the second power amplifier is halted. Regarding claim 18, the prior art made of record fails to clearly teach or fairly suggest the feature of the variable load matching circuit includes: a first inductor connected between the first power amplifier and an antenna connection terminal; a second inductor and a first switch connected in parallel to the first inductor, between the first power amplifier and the antenna connection terminal, the second inductor and the first switch being connected in series; a first capacitor connected between ground and a path between the first power amplifier and the antenna connection terminal; and a second capacitor and a second switch connected in parallel to the first capacitor, between the ground and the path between the first power amplifier and the antenna connection terminal, the second capacitor and the second switch being connected in series. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tuan A. Pham whose telephone number is (571) 272-8097, the fax number is (571) 273-8097 and the email is tuan.pham01@uspto.gov. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday, 8:30 AM-5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Yuwen (Kevin) Pan can be reached on (571) 272-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUAN PHAM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771390
ADJACENT-CHANNEL INTERFERENCE CHARACTERIZATION FOR IN-BAND INTERFERENCE EXCISION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12757135
VALIDITY PERIOD DETERMINING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750437
DAMPING MECHANISM AND TERMINAL
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12726228
SIGNAL RECEIVING APPARATUS AND METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719978
Mobile Phone Case with Compartment Configured to Store and Provide Quick Access to a Pod of Sanitizing Wipes
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.4%)
2y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 992 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month