Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/983,531

WATER-COOLING DEVICE CONNECTION STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Examiner
HINCAPIE SERNA, GUSTAVO A
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
250 granted / 419 resolved
-10.3% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
455
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 419 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION. — The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 3, in line 3, it is unclear what “the second through hole” of the multiple second through-holes corresponding to the “multiple second flanges” of line 2 the claim is referring to. Similarly, in line 4, it is unclear what “the second flange” of the “multiple second flanges” of line 2 the claim is referring to. For the purpose of this examination, the claim has been interpreted to mean, in lines 3-4: --…each second through-hole penetrates from the front to the back of the respective second flange, multiple fasteners pass…--. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US 2025/0389361, herein “Lee”). Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses: a water-cooling device connection structure (figs. 1-5), comprising: a water-cooling unit (cooling unit of electronic device 14) (fig. 1) [par. 0022], having an inlet (connected to connector 166) (fig. 1), an outlet (not disclosed, by required to complete the cooling cycle, known in the art), and a chamber (the pipeline inside the electronic device 14 is read as the chamber) connecting the inlet and the outlet (fig. 1) [par. 0022]; at least one connection unit (16), having a coupling component (160b plus 162 plus 166 plus 1660) and a mating component (160a plus 168 plus 1662 plus 1664) (figs. 2-5), the coupling component (160b plus 162 plus 166 plus 1660) having a fixed base portion (160b plus 162) with an extended portion (166 plus 1660) extending outwardly from the front (at 162) of the fixed base portion (160b plus 162) (seen in figs. 3-4), the extended portion (166 plus 1660) containing a first channel (the channel formed by portion 1660) (fig. 3), the external side of the extended portion (166 plus 1660) fitted with at least one leakage proofing portion (barbs seen in portion 1660, fig. 3), the extended portion (166 plus 1660) connecting to the inlet or outlet of the water-cooling unit (cooling unit of electronic device 14) through the leakage proofing portion (barbs of portion 1660) (figs. 1-5) [par. 0022], the mating component (160a plus 168 plus 1662 plus 1664) having a receiving base portion (160a plus 168), the front of the receiving base portion (160a plus 168) connecting to the rear of the coupling component (160b plus 162 plus 166 plus 1660) (fig. 3), the rear of the receiving base portion (160a plus 168) extended outwardly with a fitting portion (1662 plus 1664), the fitting portion (1662 plus 1664) containing a second channel (the channel formed by portion 1662), and the second channel (the channel formed by portion 1662) connecting to the first channel (figs. 2-5) [paragraph 0022]; and at least one pipe (12 plus 120) (figs. 1-2), having a connecting end (120), the connecting end (120) fitted into the second channel (the channel formed by portion 1662) of the mating component (160a plus 168 plus 1662 plus 1664) and combined within the first channel (the channel of the portion 1660) of the coupling component (160b plus 162 plus 166 plus 1660), thereby connecting the chamber of the water-cooling unit (cooling unit of electronic device 14) with the pipe (12 plus 120) (seen in fig. 1). Regarding claim 4, Lee discloses: the extended portion (1660) of the coupling component (160b plus 162 plus 166 plus 1660) being tightly fitted into the water-cooling unit (cooling unit of electronic device 14) via the leakage proofing portion (barbs seen in portion 1660, fig. 3) (known in the art). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee. Regarding claim 2, Lee discloses: the fixed base portion (160b plus 162) having multiple first connecting sections that are arranged outwardly of the fixed base portion (160b plus 162) that are opposite to each other (see annotated fig. 3-LEE, below), each first connecting section including a first through-hole (for fasteners 170) that penetrates from the front to the back of the first connecting section (see annotated fig. 3-LEE, below). Lee discloses the invention as claimed, except for the multiple first connecting sections (see annotated fig. 3-LEE, below) being in the form of flanges that are extended outwardly from two external sides of the fixed base portion (160b plus 162). PNG media_image1.png 453 818 media_image1.png Greyscale However, Lee discloses that other fixing manners between the fixed base portion (160b plus 162) and the receiving base portion (160a plus 168) may be determined according to practical applications [par. 0018]. It would have been obvious to one of skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to design the plate elements (160a and 160b) of the fixed base portion (160b plus 162) and the receiving base portion (160a plus 168) with flanges that are extended outwardly from two external sides of the fixed base portion (160b plus 162) and the receiving base portion (160a plus 168), since the design of the corners of plates (160a and 160b) does not change their function, and applicant has not disclosed that having flanges that are extended outwardly from two external sides of the fixed base portion (160b plus 162) and the receiving base portion (160a plus 168) solves any stated problem or is for any particular purpose and it appears that the invention would perform equally well having the corners of plates (160a and 160b) where the through-holes for fasteners (170) are located being arranged in other forms, according to the user’s needs and/or practical applications. Further, it has been held that changing the shape of an old device is a matter of design choice which involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.04, section IV, part A. Regarding claim 3, Lee discloses: the receiving base portion (160a plus 168) having multiple second connecting sections, each with a second through-hole (for fasteners 170), each second through-hole penetrates from the front to the back of the respective second connecting section (see annotated fig. 3-LEE, page 4), multiple fasteners (170) pass through the second through-holes of the second connecting sections and into the first through-holes of the first connecting sections to secure the second connecting sections and the first connecting sections (see annotated fig. 3-LEE, page 4). Lee discloses the invention as claimed, except for the multiple second connecting sections (see annotated fig. 3-LEE, page 4) being in the form of flanges. However, Lee discloses that other fixing manners between the fixed base portion (160b plus 162) and the receiving base portion (160a plus 168) may be determined according to practical applications [par. 0018]. It would have been obvious to one of skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to design the plate elements (160a and 160b) of the fixed base portion (160b plus 162) and the receiving base portion (160a plus 168) with flanges that are extended outwardly from two external sides of the fixed base portion (160b plus 162) and the receiving base portion (160a plus 168), since the design of the corners of plates (160a and 160b) does not change their function, and applicant has not disclosed that having flanges that are extended outwardly from two external sides of the fixed base portion (160b plus 162) and the receiving base portion (160a plus 168) solves any stated problem or is for any particular purpose and it appears that the invention would perform equally well having the corners of plates (160a and 160b) where the through-holes for fasteners (170) are located being arranged in other forms, according to the user’s needs and/or practical applications. Further, it has been held that changing the shape of an old device is a matter of design choice which involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.04, section IV, part A. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Scartozzi (US 2006/0273588). Regarding claim 5, Lee does not disclose: the connecting end (120) of the pipe (12 plus 120) and the fitting portion (1662 plus 1664) of the mating component (160a plus 168 plus 1662 plus 1664) being bonded together using an adhesive. Scartozzi teaches that it is old and known in the art to couple connection ends (18) of pipes (12) with fitting portions (22) via any of a number of methods including friction fit, clips, clamps, a welded joint, and an adhesive bond [par. 0020] in order to provide a no-leak seal with such fittings. It would have been obvious to one of skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate into Lee the teachings of Scartozzi to have the connecting end (120) of the pipe (12 plus 120) and the fitting portion (1662 plus 1664) of the mating component (160a plus 168 plus 1662 plus 1664) being bonded together using an adhesive for the purpose of providing a no-leak seal between the pipe and the fitting. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to apply a known technique to a known device ready for improvement to yield predictable results. KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1396 (2007). In the instant case, bonding the connecting end (120) of the pipe (12 plus 120) and the fitting portion (1662 plus 1664) would optimize leak prevention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee and Scartozzi, as it applies to claims 1 and 5, above, and further in view of Warke (US 2021/0212274). Regarding claim 6, Lee does not disclose: the inner diameter of the second channel gradually increasing from the front opening to the rear opening of the fitting portion, forming a conical channel. Scartozzi teaches that it is old and known in the art to couple connection ends (18) of pipes (12) with fitting portions (22) via any of a number of methods including friction fit, clips, clamps, a welded joint, and an adhesive bond [par. 0020] in order to provide a no-leak seal with such fittings. In this regard, Warke teaches that fittings (10) comprising an inner diameter (Dd, Dp) gradually increasing from one end (12a) to an opposite end (12b) (figs. 1-1B) for the purpose of facilitating connection of a pipe (10) with the fitting (10) are old and known in the art [par. 0021-0022]. It would have been obvious to one of skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate into Lee the teachings of Scartozzi and Warke to have the inner diameter of the second channel gradually increasing from the front opening to the rear opening of the fitting portion, forming a conical channel, in order to facilitate placement and to provide a no-leak seal between the pipe and the fitting. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GUSTAVO A HINCAPIE SERNA whose telephone number is (571)272-6018. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Len Tran can be reached at 571-272-1184. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GUSTAVO A HINCAPIE SERNA/Examiner, Art Unit 3763 /JENNA M MARONEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692950
MULTIWAY VALVE FOR AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE, THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12672614
INTEGRATED REGULATION AND CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR LIGHT, HEAT AND WATER IN GREENHOUSE, AND GREENHOUSE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669280
REFRIGERATOR WITH A VACUUM-INSULATED STRUCTURE SUPPORTED BY A STRUCTURAL SUPPORT WITH A BASEPLATE WELDED TO THE VACUUM-INSULATED STRUCTURE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12644655
SECONDARILY APPLIED COLD SIDE FEATURES FOR CAST HEAT EXCHANGER
7y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12609374
COOLING PIPE OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE BATTERY
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+23.7%)
3y 3m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 419 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month