Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/983,728

CANISTER WITH A PUMP FOR DISPERSING LIQUIDS AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Priority
Dec 22, 2023 — provisional 63/613,895
Examiner
PANCHOLI, VISHAL J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Native Pet Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
686 granted / 940 resolved
+13.0% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
965
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
81.1%
+41.1% vs TC avg
§102
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 940 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1-6 objected to because of the following informalities: All the claims recite “a or the cannister” but sometimes recite “canister”. The correct spelling for the structure is “canister” and should be recited as such for all claims to ensure uniformity. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the metal canister" in line 2 and “the plastic pump” in line 6. Claim 1 does not recite “a metal canister” and “a plastic pump” prior to the above limitations. Therefore, there is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claim. Claim 5 recites the limitation “the canister opening” in line 6. Claim 5 ultimately depends from claim 1 through claims 2-4. However, none of these claims recite “a canister opening”. Therefore, there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 6 recites the limitation “the top opening” in line 5. Claim 6 ultimately depends from claim 1 through claims 2-5. However, none of these claims recite “a top opening”. Therefore, there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Dependent claims 2-4 are also rejected under the same grounds for being dependent on claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Toh et al. (“Toh” hereinafter) (US PG PUB 2019/0200812) in view of Binder (US PN 2,920,799). Regarding claim 1, Toh teaches a canister (item 1100, figure 33) for dispersing fluids, comprising: a canister to contain liquid material (paragraph 0117]) and affixing a pump (item 1700, figure 33) onto the canister so the liquid material are be dispersed through a pumping action; the canister comprises a base (item 1160, figure 33) with seamed bottom ends (bottom has angular seems where sidewalls and bottom wall meet, figure 33) and a top portion (item 1140, figure 34) with seamed top ends (figure 34), the canister comprises a plug (item 1400, figure 34) operable as an interface medium, and the plastic pump (the components of the dispenser are made of various plastic materials) screws onto the plug to create a seal between the plug and the pump (pump 1700 is screwed onto interface assembly 1400, figure via threads 1420, figure 37). Toh is silent to the container being made of metal. Binder teaches a metallic container (item 1, figure 1) with a top seamed end (see figure 1) comprising a top portion and a bottom portion with a plug (item 3, figure 1) that acts as an interface medium, wherein the plug comprises a threaded open end (item 6, figure 1) to which a closure cap or other threaded components can be attached. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have used the pump of Toh in the metallic canister of Binder in order to form a sealed pump assembly since Binder already teaches a metallic container and a plug having a threaded interface. Alternatively, it would be obvious to form the canister body of Toh out of a metal material for durability and also to provide a metallic look to the overall dispenser if such is desired. Doing either modification requires simple substitution and interfacing the inventions with each other which is within the range of one of ordinary skill in the art. Regarding claims 2 and 3, Toh as modified by Binder teaches a pump, a plug, and a canister with various dimensions such as height, length, diameter of circular components and widths. The prior arts do not teach the exact dimensions in mm or any other units. However, It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have formed the pump of the invention of Toh with any suitable dimensions as desired by an end-user since doing so involves routine skill in the art and is also an obvious matter of design choice. One is not limited to the dimension choices contemplated by the claimed invention and can form the pump with any suitable size and shape. Regarding claim 4, Toh teaches that the pump comprises a connecting cap, a closure (item 1740, figure 55), a gasket (paragraph [0110], “a thermoplastic elastomeric gasket”), a housing (item 1850, figure 55), a piston (item 1870, figure 55), a piston rod (elongated component extending from piston 1870 and extending to actuator 1750, figure 55), a piston seat (bottom of housing 1850, figure 55), a spring (item 1890, figure 55), and a ball (item 1880, figure 55); the closure includes a diameter Dc (figure 55), the gasket includes a diameter Dg (figure 55), the pump includes a diameter Dp (figure 55), and the connecting cap includes a height Hcc (figure 55) and the pump includes the pump height Hp (figure 55); the closure includes an inner threaded portion (item 1760, figure 55) that engages with the plug to tighten thereupon (figure 55); the closure includes a diameter D1 to concentrically engage with the plug (figure 55). Regarding claim 5, Toh teaches that the plug includes a cylindrical top portion (item 1420, figure 37), a middle sealing portion (item 1410, figure 37), and a bottom engagement portion (item 1480, figure 37); the cylindrical top portion engages with the pump (figure 55) while the sealing portion creates a fluid tight seal against the top of the canister (figure 33), and the bottom engagement portion locks the plug into the fluid tight seal against the top of the canister; the bottom engagement portion includes a circular tab (item 1490, figure 37) that lock against the top portion of the canister opening and a plurality of insert tabs (item 1510, figure 37) to further prevent movement of the plug once engaged with the canister. Regarding claim 6, Toh teaches that the cylindrical top portion includes a diameter Dt that concentrically engages with the pump (figure 55); the cylindrical top portion includes a threaded portion (threads on neck 1420, figure 37) to concentrically lock and seal the pump on the top portion of the plug (figure 55); the cylindrical top portion includes a height Ht (figure 55); the circular tab includes a length Lt that is sufficient to engage and lock against the top opening of the canister (figures 37 and 44); the insert tabs include a locking tab Li that extends outward from the insert tab (figure 37), that further prevents movement of the plug and creates a fluid tight seal with the canister opening. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. a. The following prior arts disclose subject matter related to pump collars that act as interface mediums between a pump and a container body: US PN 3,397,824, US PN 3,764,04; and The following prior arts disclose subject matter related to dispenser assemblies with a pump, a joining collar, and a container: US PN 1,229,556, US PN 3,379,136, US PN 3,877,616, US PN 3,949,910, US PN 5,421,485, US PN 6,003,737, US PN 6,269,976, US PN 6,412,663, US PN 6,419,393, US PG PUB 2005/0006409, US PG PUB 2016/0023227. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VISHAL J PANCHOLI whose telephone number is (571)272-9324. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday (9 am - 7 pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul Durand can be reached at 571-272-4459. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Vishal Pancholi/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679602
HOLLOW HAND-HELD STORAGE DEVICE FOR STORING ITEMS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674700
METERING DEVICE FOR A MACHINE FOR MAKING A LIQUID PREPARATION
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12654908
Portable Fluid Tank System with Angled Spill Face
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654186
APPARATUS FOR USE WITH MULTIPLE COUPLEABLE ACCESSORIES
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12636664
TRIGGER SPRAYER VENTING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING THE SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+25.3%)
2y 3m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 940 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month