Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/983,825

SENSORLESS MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A POWER TOOL AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN INITIAL ROTOR POSITION OF A SENSORLESS MOTOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Priority
Jan 25, 2024 — TW 113200908
Examiner
IMTIAZ, ZOHEB S
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Basso Industry Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
398 granted / 491 resolved
+13.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
519
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
59.2%
+19.2% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 491 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2, 5-8 and 10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Heidrich US publication no.: US 2004/0113576 A1 in view of Obermann et al. US publication no.: US 2022/0241951 A1. Regarding claims 1 and 7, Heidrich teaches, A sensorless motor control system, comprising: a drive unit including a motor having three phase windings and a rotor (see motor 10, figure 1 and paragraph 17 which includes rotor 13 and stator 12), and an actuation circuit (switching device 14, figure 3) electrically connected to said three phase windings, and including three switch units that are electrically connected respectively to said three phase windings, each of said three switch units including a high-side switch and a low-side switch that are connected in series and that have a common node, said common node being electrically connected to a respective one of said three phase windings (see figures 1-2 where the actuation unit includes high-side and low-side switches); a detection unit including a current detection circuit for detecting a current of said motor (see paragraphs 22-23, where the measurements of the current is disclosed); and a control unit (control device 15, figure 1) electrically connected to said power unit, said actuation circuit, and said detection unit, wherein said control unit is configured to, when said motor is being activated, control said actuation circuit to alternately actuate said high-side switches respectively of said three switch units and alternately actuate said low-side switches respectively of said three switch units during a plurality of detection cycle periods in such a manner that, said high-side switch of one of said three switch units and said low-side switch of a different one of said three switch units are actuated during each of the plurality of detection cycle periods (see paragraphs 22-23 where the current is applied to the high-side and low-side switching controlled is seen which can be further seen in figure 3); wherein said control unit is further configured to, during each of the plurality of detection cycle periods, when determining that the current of said motor fulfills a predetermined condition (see “current rise times” in paragraphs 22-23), stop actuating (see paragraph 23 where the current impulse have “decayed” prior to the next test current impulse is intruded) said high-side switch of said one of said three switch units and said low-side switch of said different one of said three switch units, and record an actuation (see current rise times that are saved in the memory, paragraph 23) duration for which said high-side switch of said one of said three switch units and said low-side switch of said different one of said three switch units are actuated during the detection cycle period; and wherein said control unit is further configured to determine a position of said rotor of said motor (see paragraph 22 where the “smallest current rise time” corresponds to the rotor position) based on one of said high-side switches of said three switch units and one of said low-side switches of said three switch units that correspond to a shortest one of the actuation durations that were recorded respectively for the plurality of detection cycle periods. Heidrich is silent on specifically teaching: a power tool; a power unit including a battery pack for providing power. However Obermann et al. is in the same field of art and teach: a power tool (see figure 1); a power unit including a battery pack for providing power (see paragraph 31). In view of Obermann et al.’s teachings, it would’ve been obvious to one with the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, with the apparatus as taught by Heidrich to include; a power tool; a power unit including a battery pack for providing power, for the purpose of providing a variant apparatus to be controlled. Regarding claims 2 and 8, Heidrich teaches, the sensorless motor control system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the predetermined condition is the current of said motor being greater than a predetermined current value (see paragraph 21 where the predetermined condition corresponds to current threshold). Regarding claims 5 and 11, Heidrich teaches, the sensorless motor control system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said motor is a three-phase motor, a number of possible unique combinations of said high-side switch of said one of said three switch units pairing with said low-side switch of said different one of said three switch units is six, and a number of the plurality of detection cycle periods is six; and wherein said control unit is configured to control said actuation circuit to actuate the possible unique combinations sequentially, one at a time, during each of the plurality of detection cycle period (see figures 3-4 and paragraphs 21-23 where six test current impulses can be seen). Regarding claims 6 and 12, Obermann et al. teach, the sensorless motor control system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said motor produces a back electromotive force (BEMF) when driven to rotate, and said control unit is further configured to detect the BEMF of said motor (see BEMF detection, paragraphs 39-41), and control said actuation circuit to actuate one of said high-side switches and one of said low-side switches that correspond to a next phase of a rotation phase sequence of said motor after a delay time since said control unit detects a zero-crossing point of the BEMF. Claims 3-4 and 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Heidrich US publication no.: US 2004/0113576 A1 in view of Obermann et al. US publication no.: US 2022/0241951 A1 and further in view of Schwarzkopf et al. US Publication no.: US 2010/001971 A1. Regarding claims 3 and 9, Heidrich as modified is silent on specifically teaching, the sensorless motor control system as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of said three phase windings produces a self-induced voltage during the actuation duration in each of the plurality of detection cycle periods; and wherein each of the plurality of detection cycle periods includes a voltage drop duration taken for the self-induced voltage to drop to a predetermined voltage level after said high-side switch of said one of said three switch units and said low-side switch of said different one of said three switch units stop being actuated. However, Schwarzkopf et al. is in the same field of art and teach: wherein each of said three phase windings produces a self-induced voltage during the actuation duration in each of the plurality of detection cycle periods; and wherein each of the plurality of detection cycle periods includes a voltage drop duration taken for the self-induced voltage to drop(see freewheeling current to decay, paragraphs 66-70) to a predetermined voltage level (see “threshold value”, paragraph 70) after said high-side switch of said one of said three switch units and said low-side switch of said different one of said three switch units stop being actuated (see paragraphs 70-79, where the determination for next cycle is started). In view of Schwarzkopf et al.’s teachings, it would’ve been obvious to one with the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, with the apparatus as taught by Heidrich to include; wherein each of said three phase windings produces a self-induced voltage during the actuation duration in each of the plurality of detection cycle periods; and wherein each of the plurality of detection cycle periods includes a voltage drop duration taken for the self-induced voltage to drop to a predetermined voltage level after said high-side switch of said one of said three switch units and said low-side switch of said different one of said three switch units stop being actuated., for the purpose of increasing the efficiency of the sensorless drive system. Regarding claims 4 and 10, Heidrich as modified is silent on specifically teaching, the sensorless motor control system as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of said three phase windings produces a self-induced voltage during the actuation duration in each of the plurality of detection cycle periods; and wherein each of the plurality of detection cycle periods includes the actuation duration, a voltage drop duration, and a buffer duration, where the voltage drop duration is taken for the self-induced voltage to drop to a predetermined voltage level after said high-side switch of said one of said three switch units and said low-side switch of said different one of said three switch units stop being actuated, and the buffer duration is taken for said control unit to actuate one of said high-side switches in a next one of the plurality of detection cycle periods. However, Schwarzkopf et al. is in the same field of art and teach: wherein each of said three phase windings produces a self-induced voltage during the actuation duration in each of the plurality of detection cycle periods; and wherein each of the plurality of detection cycle periods includes the actuation duration, a voltage drop duration (see freewheeling current to decay, paragraphs 66-70),and a buffer duration (see freewheeling current to decay, pagraph 70), where the voltage drop duration is taken for the self-induced voltage to drop to a predetermined voltage level after said high-side switch of said one of said three switch units and said low-side switch of said different one of said three switch units stop being actuated (see “threshold value”, paragraph 70), and the buffer duration is taken for said control unit to actuate one of said high-side switches in a next one of the plurality of detection cycle periods (see paragraphs 70-79, where the determination for next cycle is started). In view of Schwarzkopf et al.’s teachings, it would’ve been obvious to one with the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, with the apparatus as taught by Heidrich to include; wherein each of said three phase windings produces a self-induced voltage during the actuation duration in each of the plurality of detection cycle periods; and wherein each of the plurality of detection cycle periods includes the actuation duration, a voltage drop duration, and a buffer duration, where the voltage drop duration is taken for the self-induced voltage to drop to a predetermined voltage level after said high-side switch of said one of said three switch units and said low-side switch of said different one of said three switch units stop being actuated, and the buffer duration is taken for said control unit to actuate one of said high-side switches in a next one of the plurality of detection cycle periods, for the purpose of increasing the efficiency of the sensorless drive system. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZOHEB S IMTIAZ whose telephone number is (571)272-4308. The examiner can normally be reached 11am-730pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edaurdo Colon-Santana can be reached at 571-272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZOHEB S IMTIAZ/Primary Examiner , Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771273
System and Method for Controlling a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor to Optimally Track a Reference Torque
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771213
CIRCUIT FOR RECAPTURING MAGNETIC ENERGY
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771156
Method and System for Operating an Electrically Driven Working Device With at Least One Battery Pack, Electrically Driven Working Device, And/or Battery Pack
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763706
SYSTEM FOR COMMANDING AND BRAKING AN ARTICULATED MOBILE ELEMENT OF AN AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756347
LOAD DRIVING DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+13.9%)
2y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 491 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month