Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 18/984,032

ELECTRIC MACHINE HAVING A FASTENING CLIP FOR THERMALLY COUPLING A TEMPERATURE SENSOR TO A STATOR WINDING

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Priority
Dec 18, 2023 — DE 102023135673.9
Examiner
PHAM, LEDA T
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Valeo S.A.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
762 granted / 1017 resolved
+6.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1041
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1017 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/17/24 is being considered by the examiner. Response to Amendment This office action is in response to preliminary amendment filed on 12/17/24. Regarding the amendment, claims 1-20 are present for examination. Claim Objections Claims 19-20 are objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claims 8-9. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 14, line 3 recites the term, “in particular”. The phrase "in particular" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-8, 10-14, 15-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Silvery et al. (US 2022/0200412 A1). Regarding claim 1, Silvery teaches electric machine, comprising a stator (1, fig 1), which has a stator laminated core with a plurality of stator laminations stacked axially one on the other (para [0005]) and a stator winding (3) arranged in the stator laminated core, a temperature sensor (19), which is thermally conductively coupled to the stator winding (3) and is configured to measure a temperature of the stator winding (3), wherein the thermally conductive coupling between the temperature sensor (19) and the stator winding (3) is created by a fastening clip (24 and 31) with a latching connection (32, fig 6-7) and the fastening clip (24 - 31) presses the temperature sensor (19) against the stator winding (3) or a heat-conducting element (15) thermally conductively connected to the stator winding (3). Regarding claim 2, Silvery teaches ends of individual sections (7) of the stator winding (3) are electrically connected to a connector (9), which runs in the form of a ring or in the form of an arc (8) around a stator axis of the stator (1), and the heat-conducting element (15) is formed by this connector or comprised by this connector (fig 1). Regarding claim 3, Silvery teaches the heat-conducting element (15) has an extension to which the fastening clip (24-31) is fastened. Regarding claims 5 and 16, Silvery teaches the fastening clip has a raised portion, which projects into a recess in the stator winding or the heat-conducting element, or the fastening clip (24-31) has a recess (27), into which a raised portion of the stator winding or the heat-conducting element (15) projects (fig 3). Regarding claims 6 and 17, Silvery teaches the fastening clip (24-31) has a guide (27) for the heat-conducting element (15, fig 3). Regarding claims 7 and 18, Silvery teaches the temperature sensor (19) is loosely arranged in a recess in the fastening clip (24-31, fig 2-3) or b) is fastened to the fastening clip. Regarding claims 8 and 19, Silvery teaches a cable (21) of the temperature sensor (19) is guided through an opening (27) in the fastening clip (24-31), wherein the opening (27) is smaller than an extent of the temperature sensor or a heat-shrink tube (22) mounted on the cable measured transversely to the longitudinal extent of the cable (fig 4-5). Regarding claim 10, Silvery teaches the fastening clip (24-31) is constructed i) in multiple pieces (fig 6-7) or ii) in one piece. Regarding claim 11, Silvery teaches two parts (24, 31) of the fastening clip, the parts being pivotable in relation to each other, are connected to each other via a joint (fig 9). Regarding claim 12, Silvery teaches the fastening clip (24-31) contains plastic (para [0034]), in particular polyphenylene sulfide. Regarding claim 13, Silvery teaches electric machine is provided for driving the vehicle (para [0003]). Regarding claim 14, Silvery teaches method for producing a thermally conductive coupling between a temperature sensor (19) and a stator winding (3) or a heat-conducting element (15) of an electric machine, in particular an electric machine, the heat-conducting element (15) being thermally conductively connected to a stator winding (3), which method comprises the steps of arranging the temperature sensor (19) and the stator winding (3) or the heat-conducting element (15) in a fastening clip (24-31) and producing the thermally conductive coupling between the temperature sensor (19) and the stator winding (3) or the heat-conducting element (15) by closing the fastening clip (24-31), wherein a latching connection (32) of the fastening clip (24-31) latches in and the fastening clip presses the temperature sensor (19) against the stator winding (3) or the heat-conducting element (15). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 4, 9, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Silvery in view of Feigl et al. (DE 102020211528 A1). Regarding claim 4, Silvery teaches the claimed invention as set forth in claim 1, except for the added limitation of a contact-pressure force (F) generated by the fastening clip lies in a range of from 10N ≤ F ≤ 40N. Feigl teaches a device for attaching a temperature sensor to an electric machine, the device enables a temperature sensor to be inserted easily and reliably in such a way that the temperature sensor is reliably brought into thermal contact with the end winding by means of a spring element. The spring element is exerted a spring force on a temperature sensor introduced into the enveloping body in order to press the temperature sensor in the direction of the end winding. Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Silvery’s electric machine with a contact-pressure force (F) generated by the fastening clip as taught by Feigl, and further select a specific contact pressure force lies in a range of from 10N ≤ F ≤ 40N to reliably and firmly fix to the end winding. Doing so would prevent the device from being removed without being destroyed. Regarding claims 9 and 20, Silvery teaches the claimed invention as set forth in claim 1, except for the added limitation of an elastic element is arranged between the temperature sensor and the fastening clip and/or between the stator winding or the heat-conducting element and the fastening clip. Feigl teaches a device for attaching a temperature sensor to an electric machine comprising an elastic element (15) is arranged between the temperature sensor (30) and the fastening clip (20) and/or between the stator winding or the heat-conducting element and the fastening clip to reliably and firmly attach the temperature sensor. Thus, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Silvery’s electric machine with an elastic element is arranged between the temperature sensor and the fastening clip and/or between the stator winding or the heat-conducting element and the fastening clip as taught by Feigl. Doing so would reliably and firmly attach the temperature sensor so that prevent the device from being removed without being destroyed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yoshihara et al. (US 10,935,434 B2) teaches a temperature sensor 10 according to the present invention includes a coil element (10) connected to a coil of an electric apparatus, an element main body (51) that includes a thermosensitive body (52) detecting heat of the coil element (10) and paired electric wires (55 and 56) connected to the thermosensitive body (52), and a housing (25) that includes an electric insulating resin material and is configured to house the coil element (10) and the element main body (51). The housing (25) according to the present invention includes, at a position corresponding to the thermosensitive body (52), a view window (76) allowing for visual confirmation of the thermosensitive body (52) from outside. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEDA T PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-5806. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M Koehler can be reached at (571) 272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEDA T PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771215
ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12756253
ELECTRIC ROTATING MACHINE AND METHOD AND VEHICLE COMPRISING ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749952
ELECTRIC MOTOR HAVING AN ANGLE SENSOR
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749948
Electric Traction Machine for a Motor Vehicle
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738824
ELECTRIC AXIAL FLUX MACHINE WITH PRETENSIONED STATOR COMPONENTS, AND ELECTRIC MACHINE ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SUCH AN ELECTRIC AXIAL FLUX MACHINE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 8m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1017 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month