Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/984,183

GAS JET DEFLECTION IN PRESSURIZED SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Priority
Jul 19, 2019 — provisional 62/876,116 +3 more
Examiner
WILLIAMS, JOSEPH L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Shine Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
790 granted / 954 resolved
+22.8% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
966
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
38.0%
-2.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 954 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 41-42 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Both claims depend upon cancelled claim 19. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 21-40 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding independent claim 21, the prior art of record neither shows nor suggests a method comprising: generating a pressure differential in a particle accelerator system using a pumping system, such that a first region of the particle accelerator system is at a higher pressure than a second region of the particle accelerator system; and directing an ion beam along a beam axis from an ion source of the particle accelerator system to a target chamber of the particle accelerator system, wherein the target chamber is in the first region of the particle accelerator system; a beam accelerator is in the second region of the particle accelerator system; a gas-deflector plate is positioned along the beam axis between the first region and the second region of the particle accelerator system; and jetting gas moves through a channel formed in the gas-deflector plate from the first region to the second region and enters the second region by exiting an asymmetric opening formed in the gas-deflector plate. Due to their dependency, claims 22-28 are necessarily allowable. Regarding independent claim 29, the prior art of record neither shows nor suggests a system comprising: a higher-pressure region and a lower pressure region; a plate with a first surface facing the higher-pressure region, a second surface facing the lower pressure region, a channel extending through the plate, and a beam axis extending through the channel; and a jet-deflector component coupled to the plate and extending outward from the plate into the lower pressure region. Due to their dependency, claims 30-40 are necessarily allowable. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH L WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)272-2465. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 6:30 AM- 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JAMES R. GREECE can be reached at (571) 272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JOSEPH L. WILLIAMS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2875 /JOSEPH L WILLIAMS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751183
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740246
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740249
DISPLAY PANEL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730337
WIDE AND NARROW VIEWING ANGLE-SWITCHABLE DISPLAY DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727246
DISPLAY BACKPLANE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 4m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 954 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month