Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/984,371

VALVE ARRANGEMENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Examiner
CARY, KELSEY E
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Festo SE & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
397 granted / 532 resolved
+4.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
561
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 532 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claims are generally narrative and indefinite, failing to conform with current U.S. practice. For example, the terms “which”, “can be” “on the one hand, one the other hand”, “is usefully”, “is usefully realized”, “particularly”, and others are narrative, indefinite, and cause confusion. Regarding claim 18, the phrase " in particular" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2-26 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for indicating allowable subject matter: the prior art of record neither discloses nor makes obvious the combination set forth in the independent claim. Regarding claim 1, Bogdanowicz (U.S. 2009/0126812) discloses a valve arrangement, comprising: - a valve assembly, (1a) which has a valve support (2) extending in a principle direction along a main axis and a plurality of electrically actuable directional valves (4), - wherein the valve support (2) has a mounting surface with a plurality of mounting points arranged successively in the principle direction, of which at least a plurality are designed as valve mounting points, on each of which one of the directional valves (4) can be or is mounted, - wherein a plurality of valve support fluid channels (37), through which a fluidic pressure medium can flow, are designed in the valve support (2), which are at least in part collecting fluid channels (37) extending in the principle direction, which open out at each valve mounting point and which are fluidly connected to the directional valves (4) mounted on the valve mounting points, - and wherein a communication channel (27) is designed in the valve support (2) extending in the principle direction, in which an electrical communication string (28) is arranged, having at least one electronic component (28) and is or can be connected to an electronic control device (35), with which the mounted directional valves (4) in the area of the valve mounting point allocated to each of them have an electrical contact. Bogdanowicz fails to disclose wherein at least one of the mounting points of the valve supports is designed as a cooling module mounting point, on which a cooling module of the valve arrangement, penetrated by a cooling channel structure, can be or is mounted, - wherein by means of the cooling channel structure of the mounted cooling module, a fluidic connection between at least one collecting fluid channel of the valve support fluid channels, opening out at the cooling module mounting point, and the communication channel can be or is provided, through which fluidic pressure medium diverted from the collecting fluid channel can be fed into the communication channel by executing a cooling flow as a cooling medium for cooling the at least one electronic component of the electrical communication string, in combination with the other limitations of the independent claim. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. EP 3,296,602 discloses a valve arrangement comprising a valve support, a plurality of directional valves, mounting points, fluid channels, a communication channel. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KELSEY E CARY whose telephone number is (571)272-9427. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:30am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisors, Craig Schneider can be reached at (571)-272-3607 or Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571-272-4881.. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KELSEY E CARY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584479
VALVE COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585295
SOLENOID PROPORTIONAL RELIEF VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571413
SERVOVALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565938
SWITCHING VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12565892
HERMETIC TYPE COMPRESSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 532 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month