Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/985,097

HEAD CLEANER AND LIQUID DISCHARGE APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 18, 2024
Priority
Jan 31, 2024 — JP 2024-013727
Examiner
SHENDEROV, ALEXANDER D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
800 granted / 887 resolved
+30.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 7m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
900
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
70.3%
+30.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 887 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed on 1/28/25, the requirements 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d) are met. Information Disclosure Statement The references cited on a Form PTO 1449 have been considered. Specification The specification has been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. However, the applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-8 and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nishino (U.S. 2005/0156995 A1). Nishino discloses the following claimed limitations: Regarding independent Claim 1, a head cleaner (12, §0049 and Figs. 1-6) for cleaning a nozzle face (9, §0049 and Figs. 5-6) of a liquid discharge head (5, §0049 and Figs. 1, 5-6), the head cleaner comprising: a wiper to wipe and clean the nozzle face (§§0049-0078 and Figs. 2-6), the wiper including: a wiping portion to contact and wipe the nozzle face (15, §§0049-0078 and Figs. 2-6); and a flexible presser (23, §§0049-0078 and Figs. 2-6) to press the wiping portion against the nozzle face, the flexible presser having a flexibility greater than a flexibility of the nozzle face (§0053); a support (13, 16-19, §§0044-0049 and Fig. 2) supporting the wiper; and a securing member (13, 16-19, §§0050, 0066 and Fig. 2) to secure the wiping portion to the flexible presser removably. Regarding Claim 3, wherein the flexible presser has a pressing face that is covered by the wiping portion (Fig. 2), and wherein the wiping portion includes a wiper sheet that has a thickness smaller than a thickness of the flexible presser (Fig. 3). Regarding Claim 4, wherein the wiper sheet includes an extension extending outboard from the pressing face of the flexible presser (Figs. 2-3), and wherein the securing member switches between a securing state in which the securing member presses the extension against the support to secure the extension to the support (§0049 and Figs. 2-3, 6) and a replacement state in which the securing member releases pressure applied to the extension (C, §0049 and Figs. 2-3, 5). Regarding Claim 5, a hinge (21, §0049 and Figs. 2-3) mounted on the support, wherein the securing member pivots about the hinge. Regarding Claim 6, wherein the pressing face of the flexible presser includes: a projection (27, §0052 and Figs. 4-6) to press against the wiper sheet; and a depression (26, §0052 and Figs. 4-6) depressed with respect to the projection. Regarding Claim 7, wherein the flexible presser is mounted on the support and combined with the support (Fig. 2). Regarding Claim 8, wherein the securing member includes a frame (13, §§0050, 0066 and Fig. 2). Regarding independent Claim 12, a liquid discharge apparatus (§0032 and Fig. 1) comprising: a liquid discharge head (5, §0049 and Figs. 1, 5-6) having a nozzle face (9, §0049 and Figs. 5-6) to discharge liquid; and a head cleaner (12, §0049 and Figs. 1-6) to clean the nozzle face, the head cleaner including: a wiper (§§0049-0078 and Figs. 2-6) to wipe and clean the nozzle face, the wiper including: a wiping portion (15, §§0049-0078 and Figs. 2-6) to contact and wipe the nozzle face; and a flexible presser to press the wiping portion against the nozzle face, the flexible presser (23, §§0049-0078 and Figs. 2-6) having a flexibility greater than a flexibility of the nozzle face (§0053); a support (13, 16-19, §§0044-0049 and Fig. 2) supporting the wiper; and a securing member (13, 16-19, §§0050, 0066 and Fig. 2) to secure the wiping portion to the flexible presser removably. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nishino (U.S. 2005/0156995 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Matsunaga et al. (U.S. 2021/0023846 A1). Nishino discloses the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 2, all limitations of Claim 1 (from which this Claim depends). Nishino does not disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 2, wherein the flexible presser includes a porous material. Matsunaga et al. disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 2, wherein the flexible presser includes a porous material (sponge cloth, §§0091-0093). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to apply the porous material of Matsunaga et al. to the head cleaner of Nishino to ensure a close contact of the wiping portion with the nozzle face. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-11 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the primary reason for allowance of claims 9-11 is the inclusion of the limitations of a head cleaner including a second wiping portion attached with the first wiping portion removably; and a flexible presser to press the first wiping portion and the second wiping portion against the nozzle face, the flexible presser having a flexibility greater than a flexibility of the nozzle face, the first wiping portion to peel off from the second wiping portion. It is these limitations found in the claims, as they are claimed in the combination of that has not been found, taught or suggested by the prior art of record, which makes these claims allowable over the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER D SHENDEROV whose telephone number is (571)270-7049. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas X Rodrigues can be reached at (571) 431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER D SHENDEROV/Examiner, Art Unit 2853 /JASON S UHLENHAKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679109
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING PRIMER TO DIFFERENT SIZES OF MEDIA IN INKJET PRINTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12661919
LIQUID EJECTING METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661908
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING PRIMER TO MEDIA IN INKJET PRINTERS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661899
CARTRIDGE, SYSTEM, AND CARTRIDGE SET
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654459
INK CONTAINER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.2%)
1y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 887 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month