Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/985,158

SUPERCONDUCTING ELECTRICAL SUPPLY LINE, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A SUPERCONDUCTING ELECTRICAL SUPPLY LINE AND AIRCRAFT COMPRISING SUCH A LINE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 18, 2024
Priority
Dec 22, 2023 — FR FR2315164
Examiner
JACKSON, STEPHEN W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Airbus SAS
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
990 granted / 1071 resolved
+32.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
1077
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1071 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by McDougall et al (6,236,545 from IDS of 12-18-24). McDougall discloses a method for controlling a superconducting electrical supply line, the method being carried out in a control circuit 9 of said supply line 4 and comprising the steps: obtaining a piece of information representative of a first electric current in said superconducting electrical supply line; comparing said piece of information representative of a first electric current in said superconducting electrical supply line with a first predetermined threshold value; and, wherein when said piece of information representative of a first electric current is greater than or equal to the first predetermined threshold value, generating a current, referred to as the second current, in a superconducting coil 5 arranged in the vicinity of said superconducting electrical supply line 4 and configured to emit a magnetic field, said superconducting electrical supply line 4 being configured to receive said magnetic field, the value of said second current being determined on the basis of said piece of information representative of said first current (see Abstract). With regard to the melting of a calibrated break zone (claims 2 and 4), element 15 connected in series with superconducting element 4 addresses this limitation, which describes an intrinsic type of fuse protection. With regard to claim 5, coil 5 shown positioned around superconducting line 4 is also a superconductor (see Abstract). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 6-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over McDougall et al (6,236,545). McDougall discloses a method for controlling a superconducting electrical supply line, the method being carried out in a control circuit 9 of said supply line 4 and comprising the steps: obtaining a piece of information representative of a first electric current in said superconducting electrical supply line; comparing said piece of information representative of a first electric current in said superconducting electrical supply line with a first predetermined threshold value; and, wherein when said piece of information representative of a first electric current is greater than or equal to the first predetermined threshold value, generating a current, referred to as the second current, in a superconducting coil 5 arranged in the vicinity of said superconducting electrical supply line 4 and configured to emit a magnetic field, said superconducting electrical supply line 4 being configured to receive said magnetic field, the value of said second current being determined on the basis of said piece of information representative of said first current (see Abstract). The method and control circuit disclosed by McDougall differs from the claims by not being said to be used with or part of an aircraft (claims 6 and 7) and by not having computerized control system design considerations (claims 8 and 9). It would have been obvious to persons of ordinary skill at the time of filing the invention to use the teachings of McDougall to meet the claims because no inventive step is involved with the use of a superconducting device in an aircraft environment due to the well-known use of cryogenically cooled devices such as IR imagers in aircraft and computerization of control devices is extremely common in the art, with there having been significant technical advances since the time of McDougall that make the use of program driven devices ubiquitous. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN W JACKSON whose telephone number is (571)272-2051. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:30-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Lewis can be reached at 571-272-1838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SWJackson June 25, 2026 /STEPHEN W JACKSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683384
VOLTAGE SELECTION CONTROL SCHEME FOR SYNCHRONISM CHECK IN DIGITAL SUBSTATIONS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671392
Systems, Apparatuses, and Methods for Voltage Safety Detection and Voltage Overshoot Management
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666919
TENSION GENERATION DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666920
CHUCKING SENSOR USING FLOATING ESC POWER SUPPLIES
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12651687
ZERO NOISE MAGNETIC FIELD SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+7.4%)
2y 2m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1071 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month