Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/986,202

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ADAPTIVELY ADJUSTING REFRESH TIMING OF CIM BASED ON EDRAM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 18, 2024
Priority
Dec 22, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0189888
Examiner
YANG, HAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Uif (university Industry Foundation), Yonsei University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
836 granted / 908 resolved
+32.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
926
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 908 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 2. The claims are generally narrative and indefinite, failing to conform with current U.S. practice. They appear to be a literal translation into English from a foreign document and are replete with grammatical and idiomatic errors. In claim 1, 11, the applicant claimed: “each having replica cells arranged in a direction and number according to the direction and number in which memory cells performing MAC operations together in a Computer-In-Memory (CIM) cell array are arranged.” “…arranged in a direction and number according to the direction and number..” really doesn’t make sense. Please correct and fix. Allowable Subject Matter 3. Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. 4. With respect to independent claims 1, there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation for combination in the prior art to a refresh determination module that compares voltage levels of signals output from each of the plurality of replica MAC arrays with MAC operation results according to weights stored in replica cells of the plurality of replica MAC arrays and activates a refresh enable signal for refreshing memory cells of the CIM cell array. 5. With respect to dependent claims 2-10, since these claims are depending on claim 1, therefore claims 2-10 are allowable subject matter. 6. With respect to independent claims 11, there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation for combination in the prior art to a refresh determination module that compares voltage levels of signals output from each of the plurality of replica MAC arrays with MAC operation results according to weights stored in replica cells of the plurality of replica MAC arrays and activates a refresh enable signal for refreshing memory cells of the CIM cell array. 7. With respect to dependent claims 12-20, since these claims are depending on claim 11, therefore claims 12-20 are allowable subject matter. Conclusion 8. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure, Zheng et al (US patent 10,978,134). Zheng et al (US patent 10,978,134) shows multiply accumulate array and refresh enable. 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Han Yang whose telephone is (571) 270-3048. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8am-5pm with alternate Friday off. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Richard Elms can be reached on (571) 272-1869. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HY 07/10/2026 /HAN YANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2824
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700473
Magnetic Memory Device
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694915
MEMORY DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12694919
APPARATUSES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR CONFIGURABLE MEMORY
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12694908
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688319
EMBEDDED NEXT GENERATION ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM AND IMPOSING FINE-GRAINED ACCESS CONTROL OF DATA IN A DATABASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 2m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 908 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month