Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/988,018

IMAGE SEGMENTATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 19, 2024
Priority
Mar 26, 2019 — continuation of 10/964,023 +2 more
Examiner
SUN, JIANGENG
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Snap Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
348 granted / 423 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
434
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§103
51.1%
+11.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 423 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)as being anticipated by El Saban ( US 20120327172). Regarding claim 1, El Saban teaches a method comprising: causing display of an image within a graphical user interface at a client device, the image comprising a background portion, a foreground portion, and a display of an object( FIG. 5A); receiving a first input that identifies the foreground portion of the image( 530 in FIG. 5A, 570 in FIG 5B); receiving a second input that identifies the background portion of the image( 530 in FIG. 5A, 570 in FIG 5B); identifying a boundary of the display of the object based on the foreground portion of the image and the background portion of the image( 530 in FIG. 5A); and causing display of a visualization of the boundary( 530 in FIG 5A, 630 in Fig. 6A, 670 in Fig. 6B). Regarding claim 2, El Saban teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: cropping the object from the image based on the visualization of the boundary( 630 in fig. 6A; 670 in FIG 6B ); and generating a media object based on the cropping the object from the image( 630 in fig. 6A; 670 in FIG 6B ). Regarding claim 3, El Saban teaches the method of claim 2, further comprising: saving the media object at a memory location associated with a user of the client device( 600 in fig. 6A, 650 in fig 6B). Regarding claim 4, El Saban teaches the method of claim 2, wherein the image is a first image( Fig. 3B), and the method further comprises: causing display of a second image at the client device ( fig. 5A); receiving a tactile input that identifies a position within the second image( 530 in fig. 5B); and presenting the media object at the position within the second image based on the tactile input that identifies the position within the second image( 537 in fig. 5B). Regarding claim 5, El Saban teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the first input identifies a set of pixels from within the foreground of the image, and the method further comprises: generating a color model of the set of pixels([0043], CRF techniques include the use of motion probabilities based on background stability and foreground motion and color probabilities); and identifying the foreground of the image based on the color model([0043], CRF techniques include the use of motion probabilities based on background stability and foreground motion and color probabilities). Regarding claim 6, El Saban teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the first input that identifies the foreground of the image comprises a tactile input that draws a line over the foreground of the image( 537 in fig. 5B). Regarding claim 7, El Saban teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the first input identifies a first set of pixels within the foreground of the image and the second input identifies a second set of pixels within the background of the image, and the identifying the boundary of the display of the object includes: generating a first color model that represents the foreground portion of the image based on the first set of pixels ( Fig. 4A-4D, [0089], user input is provided to identify a primary face region… used to compute background and foreground color likelihoods); generating a second color model that represents the background portion of the image based on the second set of pixels ( Fig. 4A-4D, [0089], used to compute background and foreground color likelihoods) ; and identifying the boundary of the object depicted in the images based on the first color model and the second color model ( Fig. 12A, [0142], and is assigned a probability value, based on whether the nodes are inside or outside a region defined by the template boundary 1230. Probabilities for color likelihood terms are shown for the nodes in the initial representation of FIG. 12A). Claims 8-20 recite the system and medium for the method in claims 1-7. Since El Saban also teaches a system and medium ( Fig. 1 and Fig. 2), those claims are also rejected). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIANGENG SUN whose telephone number is (571)272-3712. The examiner can normally be reached 8am to 5pm, EST, M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randolph Vincent can be reached at 571 272 8243. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JIANGENG SUN Examiner Art Unit 2661 /Jiangeng Sun/Examiner, Art Unit 2671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749162
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DENOISING IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749159
Generalizable Image-Based Training Framework for Artificial Intelligence-Based Noise and Artifact Reduction in Medical Images
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12737841
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR ENHANCEMENT OF POROUS MEDIA IMAGES
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727788
BIOMETRIC IMAGING DEVICE, BIOMETRIC IMAGING METHOD AND PROGRAM
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12731436
INTELLIGENT RECOGNITION METHOD FOR JOB CONTENTS OF BARBERSHOP EMPLOYEES
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+13.4%)
2y 8m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 423 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month