Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/989,918

AUDIO DEVICE INCLUDED IN ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 20, 2024
Priority
Aug 04, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0097602 +2 more
Examiner
KRZYSTAN, ALEXANDER J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
919 granted / 1130 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1170
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1130 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4,9-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Frank (US 3898532 A). As per claim 1, Frank discloses an audio device comprising: a processor 34, Fig. 6 configured to output an audio signal 13,15; an audio amplifier 12,14 configured to amplify and output the audio signal output from the processor through an interface electrically connecting the processor; a switch part 30 configured to switch the amplified audio signal output from the audio amplifier to a sound output in response to a switching control signal (EN/DIS); the sound output 8 configured to output the amplified audio signal transferred through the switch part to an outside; and a rectifier (rectifier 106 and bistable circuit 47 via relay coil 114 see para 20) configured to output the switching control signal (EN/DIS) for enabling or disabling the switch part if there is the audio signal transferred from the processor to the audio amplifier through the interface. As per claim 2, the audio device of claim 1, wherein the rectifier is configured to rectify the audio signal transferred from the processor to the audio amplifier through the interface into a DC voltage signal and output the DC voltage signal as the switching control signal (EN/DIS) (via the bistable circuit 47). As per claim 3, the audio device of claim 2, further comprising: an adjustment part 114 configured to adjust a voltage level of the DC voltage signal output from the rectifier and transfer the DC voltage signal to the switch part (per para 20: A relay coil 114, having contacts which are the aforesaid loudspeaker disconnect switch means 30 and 30'). As per claim 4, the audio device of claim 3, wherein the adjustment part boosts or drops the voltage level of the DC voltage signal output from the rectifier and transfer the DC voltage signal to the switch part (per the circuit bistable circuit 47). As per claim 9, the audio device of claim 1, wherein the sound output includes a plurality of speakers (figs. 6, 1, speakers 8,8’), wherein the switch part includes a plurality of switches (30 30’) configured to connect the plurality of speakers independently from the audio amplifier, and wherein the rectifier is configured to output the switching control signal (EN/DIS) for controlling the plurality of switches (per para 20: A relay coil 114, having contacts which are the aforesaid loudspeaker disconnect switch means 30 and 30'). As per claim 10, the audio device of claim 9, further comprising: a signal divider configured to output a switching control signal for each of the plurality of switches by the switching control signal (EN/DIS) output by the rectifier (the mechanical relationship between 114 and each of the switches comprises a different impedance which generates a separate, divided signal to each switch). As per claim 11, the audio device of claim 9, further comprising: a signal divider configured to output a switching control signal for each of the plurality of switches by the switching control signal (EN/DIS) output by the rectifier, wherein any one (P13) of a plurality of input terminals (P13, P30) of the signal divider is electrically connected to the rectifier (the connection via the rectifier to 114, which is divided to the separate switches). As per claim 12, the audio device of claim 9, further comprising: a signal divider configured to output a switching control signal for each of the plurality of switches by the switching control signal (EN/DIS) output by the rectifier, wherein any one (P30) of a plurality of input terminals (P13, P30) of the signal divider is electrically connected to the processor (via 114). As per claim 13, the audio device of claim 9, further comprising: a signal divider configured to output a switching control signal for each of the plurality of switches by the switching control signal (EN/DIS) output by the rectifier, wherein any one (P30) of plurality of input terminals (P13, P30) of the signal divider is electrically connected to the audio amplifier (via 114). As per claim 14, the audio device of claim 10, wherein the signal divider is a logic circuit configured to output a first switching control signal (EN) for enabling a first switch included in the plurality of switches and a second switching control signal (DIS) for disabling a second switch included in the plurality of switches by the switching control signal (EN/DIS) output by the rectifier (via 114 and the bistable rectifier stage 47). As per claim 15, a method for controlling an output of an audio signal by an electronic device, the method comprising: obtaining, by the electronic device, the audio signal; amplifying the obtained audio signal; rectifying, by a rectifier, the obtained audio signal and outputting a switching control signal (EN/DIS) based on the rectified signal; and outputting the amplified audio signal based on the switching control signal (per claim 1 rejection). As per claim 16, the method of claim 15, wherein the switching control signal (EN/DIS) is a signal that controls enabling (EN) or disabling (DIS) the output of the amplified audio signal (via 114). As per claim 17, the method of claim 15, wherein if the rectified signal is above a predetermined voltage, the switching control signal (EN/DIS) is output to enable (EN) the output of the amplified audio signal (the signal from 114 being above a threshold activates the switches 30 and 30’). As per claim 18, the method of claim 15, wherein if the rectified signal is below a predetermined voltage, the switching control signal (EN/DIS) is output to disable (DIS) the output of the amplified audio signal (the signal from 114 being above a threshold activates the switches 30 and 30’) As per claim 19, the method of claim 16, further comprising adjusting a voltage level of the rectified signal (via circuit 47). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5-8,20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Frank (US 3898532 A) as applied to claims 1 above. As per claim 20, Frank discloses a circuit that is part of an electronic device to perform operations of controlling an output of an audio signal, the operations comprising: obtaining, by the electronic device, the audio signal; amplifying the obtained audio signal; rectifying, by a rectifier, the obtained audio signal and outputting a switching control signal (EN/DIS) based on the rectified signal; and outputting the amplified audio signal based on the switching control signal. (per the claim 1 rejection). However, Frank does not specify that the device comprises digital processor, including one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by a processor individually or collectively, cause the device comprising the circuit of Frank to operate as cited above. The examiner takes official notice it was well known in the art at the time of filing, that audio amplifiers and speakers and be integrated into electronic devices like phones and hearing aids for the purpose of providing audio to the user. Where said modern electronic devices all comprise digital central processors with memory and software to implement the electronic device. As per claim 5,6,7,8 Frank discloses a circuit comprising an audio amplifier, rectifier and processor, but does not disclose the specifics of integration. It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time of filing that the disclosed circuit portions could be located in different respective positions on a circuit board for the purpose of design choice, and further could be integrated for the advantages inherent to integration. As such the said integrated circuit comprises: As per claim 5, the audio device of claim 1, wherein the audio amplifier and the rectifier are configured as one integrated circuit. As per claim 6, the audio device of claim 1, wherein the processor and the rectifier are configured as one integrated circuit. As per claim 7, the audio device of claim 1, wherein the audio amplifier and the switch part are configured as one integrated circuit. As per claim 8, the audio device of claim 1, wherein the audio amplifier, the rectifier, and the switch part are configured as one integrated circuit. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER KRZYSTAN whose telephone number is 571-272-7498, and whose email address is alexander.krzystan@uspto.gov The examiner can usually be reached on m-f 7:30-4:00 est. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone or email are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fan Tsang can be reached on (571) 272-7547. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned are 571-273-8300 for regular communications and 571-273-8300 for After Final communications. /ALEXANDER KRZYSTAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2653 Examiner Alexander Krzystan July 17, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707221
METHODS, APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS FOR A PRE-RENDERED SIGNAL FOR AUDIO RENDERING
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12705016
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-POINT CONTEXTUAL CONNECTIVITY FOR WIRELESS AUDIO DEVICES
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707219
ELECTRONIC SYSTEM WITH EARPHONE/HEADPHONE RECOMMENDATION BASED ON EXPECTED CONTEXT OF DAILY USAGE OF WEARABLE AUDIO OUTPUT DEVICE(S)
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12689693
SPATIALLY BASED ADAPTIVE FILTER FOR A DOUBLE TALK RECOVERY METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12687624
Ultrasonic Transmission for Presence Detection
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+7.5%)
2y 12m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1130 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month