Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/991,177

METHOD AND MOULD SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 20, 2024
Priority
Jun 30, 2022 — GB 2209678.8 +1 more
Examiner
LEE, EDMUND H
Art Unit
1744
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Pulpex Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
803 granted / 1157 resolved
+4.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1195
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
74.7%
+34.7% vs TC avg
§102
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1157 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant's election with traverse of claims 1-13 in the reply filed on 6/17/26 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the storage medium of Group IV cannot be used for the process of deforming a preform into a three-dimensional non-hollow shape as the expandable member is recited as being located within the partially formed receptacle. This is not found persuasive because there is no instruction for placing the expandable member within a hollow member. Further, since the groups have different classifications, a search and examination of each group would be an undue burden on the examiner. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 14-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 6/17/26. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The phrase “the receptacle” (cl 7:2) is indefinite because it is unclear which receptacle is meant, the partially formed receptacle or the receptacle. It appears it should be the partially formed receptacle. The phrase “the receptacle” (cl 7:3) is indefinite because it is unclear which receptacle is meant, the partially formed receptacle or the receptacle. It appears it should be the partially formed receptacle. Corrections are required. Claims 1-6 and 8-13 are allowed. Claim 7 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: regarding claim 1, the prior art of record including the closest prior art WO01/61109 teaches providing a mould (figs 2a-2d and 4a-4d); providing a partially formed receptacle within the mould (figs 2a-2d and 4a-4d; molded body 7 constitutes the partially formed receptacle); providing an expandable member, in a first configuration, within the partially formed receptacle (figs 2a-2d and 4a-4d; core 8 constitutes the partially formed receptacle); however, WO01/61109 neither teaches nor renders obvious every claimed limitation including moving the expandable member, in the first configuration, into contact with a base of the partially formed receptacle such that the expandable member deforms toward a periphery of the base of the partially formed receptacle; and inserting fluid into the expandable member to expand the expandable member from the first configuration to a second configuration more expanded than the first configuration so as to urge the partially formed receptacle against an inner surface of the mould during a process to form the receptacle from the partially formed receptacle. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following references teaches molding containers with expandable members: EP1029978, JP2000-226800, JP3973368, and FR2854592. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDMUND H LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1204. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xiao (Sam) Zhao can be reached at 571-270-5343. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. EHL /EDMUND H LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1744
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12668022
THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661844
INSERT FOR VACUUM FORMING
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654359
CONTROL METHOD FOR 3D PRINTER FOR CONSTRUCTION
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651682
CONDUCTIVE MEMBER AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643299
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FLUID-FILLED CHAMBERS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+17.8%)
3y 0m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1157 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month