Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/992,392

METHOD FOR MANAGING GAME, AND TERMINAL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Priority
Nov 28, 2022 — CN 202211501369.1 +1 more
Examiner
GARNER, WERNER G
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Honor Device Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
469 granted / 786 resolved
At TC average
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
818
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§103
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 786 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 – Non-Transitory Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The United States Patent and Trademark Office is obliged to give claims their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification during proceeding before the USPTO. See In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (during patent examination the pending claims must be interpreted broadly as their terms reasonably allow). The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim drawn to a computer-readable storage medium (also called machine readable medium and other such variations) typically covers forms of non-transitory tangible media and transitory propagating media, particularly when the specification is silent. See MPEP 2111.01. When the broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim covers a signal per se, the claim must be rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as covering non-statutory subject matter. See In re Nuitjen, 500 F.3d 1346, 1356-1357 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (transitory embodiments are not directed to statutory subject matter). A claim drawn to such a computer readable medium that covers both transitory and non-transitory embodiments may be amended to narrow the claim to cover only statutory embodiments to avoid a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 by adding the limitation “non-transitory” to the claim. Such an amendment would typically not raise the issue of new matter, even when the specification is silent because the broadest reasonable interpretation relies on the ordinary and customary meaning that includes signals per se. Prior Art There are currently no prior art rejections against claims 1-20. The closest prior art includes “Steam (service)” from Wikipedia (hereinafter Steam Service) and “Steam Support: Setting Game Launch Options” (hereinafter Steam Support). Together Steam Service and Steam Support describe the Steam client, a PC application that manages a user’s library of games, lets users organize/sort/add games, and provides an in-game overlay through which a player can manager selected Steam settings without exiting the game. Steam Service differs from the claimed invention because it discloses an in-game overlay for accessing setting generally, but contains no disclosure of a “setting card” with discrete per-function controls, or of any mechanism synchronizing a setting’s state between an app-level UI and an in-game panel. Steam Support differs from the claimed invention because its single freeform Launch Options text box is not a set of discrete setting controls corresponding to one of more functions, and it describes pre-launch configuration rather than a live, two-way synchronized setting shared between an app-level setting card and an in-game setting panel. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WERNER G GARNER whose telephone number is (571)270-7147. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-15:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVID LEWIS can be reached at (571) 272-7673. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WERNER G GARNER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738123
Large LED Display for Multiple Gaming Format
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12718655
LOCATION BASED ACCOUNTING OF STREAMING ACTIVITIES IN A GAME STREAMING ENVIRONMENT
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12718651
Electronic Gaming Device with Field Replaceable Modular Display Panel
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12708851
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING DIALOGUE COMPLEXITY IN VIDEO GAMES
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12711834
GAMING SYSTEMS FOR OBTAINING RANDOM NUMERIC INPUTS
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+24.7%)
3y 2m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 786 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month