Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/993,232

LIVE STREAM CONTENT PLAYBACK METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 10, 2025
Examiner
TELAN, MICHAEL R
Art Unit
2426
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
BEIJING ZITIAO NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
42%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 42% of resolved cases
42%
Career Allow Rate
176 granted / 417 resolved
-15.8% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
453
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§103
65.6%
+25.6% vs TC avg
§102
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 417 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 9-10, 12, 14-15, and 20-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Van Handel (US 2017/0272833). Regarding claim 1, Van Handel teaches a method for playing live stream content, comprising: presenting target media content in a media content presentation page ([0084], “Referring to the exemplary screen shot of FIG. 8, note the list of recently watched shows 802. More precisely, element 802 shows a filter list with up and down carrots whereon ‘recently watched’ has been selected; the box art icons of the recently watched shows are in a row at the bottom of the screen and discussed further below. Other items that could have been selected on the filter list 802 include ‘favorites,’ ‘sports,’ etc.” Fig. 8); displaying a target panel, in response to a first interactive operation acting in the media content presentation page, wherein a preset associated region of the target panel is configured for displaying a ready-to-view live stream list of a user ([0084], “Referring to the exemplary screen shot of FIG. 8, note the list of recently watched shows 802. More precisely, element 802 shows a filter list with up and down carrots whereon ‘recently watched’ has been selected; the box art icons of the recently watched shows are in a row at the bottom of the screen and discussed further below. Other items that could have been selected on the filter list 802 include ‘favorites,’ ‘sports,’ etc.” [0066], “Content or data normally streamed over the cable modem can be received and distributed by the CPE 106, such as for example packetized video (e.g., IPTV).” [0077], “When the user brings up the application, he or she can scroll back and forth across live channels.” Fig. 8); and playing a target live stream content in a live stream page, in response to a playback operation acting on a first live stream content identification in the ready-to-view live stream list, wherein the playback operation acts on a first live stream content identification in the ready-to-view live stream list, and the target live stream content corresponds to the first live stream content identification ([0088], “One or more embodiments advantageously provide a quick way to leave a VOD or DVR session to check a football score, the weather, etc., then resume the VOD or DVR session exactly where the viewer left off. If the user left the VOD or DVR session to tune to a linear channel, currently, the only way to resume it is to go through a series of Menus and Box Art icons to find the same asset and resume it from where it left off.”). Regarding claim 2, Van Handel teaches wherein the target media content comprises live stream content ([0066], “Content or data normally streamed over the cable modem can be received and distributed by the CPE 106, such as for example packetized video (e.g., IPTV).” [0077], “When the user brings up the application, he or she can scroll back and forth across live channels.”), the method further comprises: adding a media content identification of the target media content to the ready-to-view live stream list of the user, in response to a ready-to-view live stream addition operation for the target media content, wherein the media content identification is a live stream content identification ([0079], “In one or more embodiments, when the user plays a VOD or DVR asset, the asset is added to the channel surfer's ‘Recently Viewed’ filter at the point where the asset is bookmarked (thus, on a PAUSE or a STOP of the asset). Therefore, the user could be watching a Recorded Show or VOD asset, press PAUSE, tune to a sporting event to catch the live score, then bring up the channel surfer app and press PLAY to automatically resume the ‘Session’ he or she was watching.”). Regarding claim 3, Van Handel teaches wherein the target panel comprises at least one of a first panel in which an addition control for the target media content is displayed and a second panel in which an addition control for the target media content is not displayed ([0079], “In one or more embodiments, when the user plays a VOD or DVR asset, the asset is added to the channel surfer's ‘Recently Viewed’ filter at the point where the asset is bookmarked (thus, on a PAUSE or a STOP of the asset). Therefore, the user could be watching a Recorded Show or VOD asset, press PAUSE, tune to a sporting event to catch the live score, then bring up the channel surfer app and press PLAY to automatically resume the ‘Session’ he or she was watching.” [0084], “Referring to the exemplary screen shot of FIG. 8, note the list of recently watched shows 802. More precisely, element 802 shows a filter list with up and down carrots whereon ‘recently watched’ has been selected; the box art icons of the recently watched shows are in a row at the bottom of the screen and discussed further below.”); and the addition control is configured for triggering the execution of the ready-to-view live stream addition operation ([0079], “In one or more embodiments, when the user plays a VOD or DVR asset, the asset is added to the channel surfer's ‘Recently Viewed’ filter at the point where the asset is bookmarked (thus, on a PAUSE or a STOP of the asset). Therefore, the user could be watching a Recorded Show or VOD asset, press PAUSE, tune to a sporting event to catch the live score, then bring up the channel surfer app and press PLAY to automatically resume the ‘Session’ he or she was watching.”). Regarding claims 9 and 20, Van Handel teaches wherein after the displaying the target panel, the method further comprises: deleting the second live stream content identification in the ready-to-view live stream list, in response to a deletion operation acting in the ready-to-view live stream list, wherein the second live stream content identification corresponds to the deletion operation ([0081], “in at least some instances, an expired VOD asset is purged from the list at the moment it is expired (either by rental window or asset license expiration), and/or a deleted DVR asset is purged from the list at the moment the user deletes it.”). Regarding claims 10 and 21, Van Handel teaches wherein after the playing the target live stream content in the live stream page, the method further comprises: in response to a live stream content switching operation acting in the live stream page, switching the live stream content played in the live stream page according to a live content stream of the live stream page ([0088], “One or more embodiments advantageously provide a quick way to leave a VOD or DVR session to check a football score, the weather, etc., then resume the VOD or DVR session exactly where the viewer left off. If the user left the VOD or DVR session to tune to a linear channel, currently, the only way to resume it is to go through a series of Menus and Box Art icons to find the same asset and resume it from where it left off.”), wherein the live content stream contains live stream content corresponding to each live stream content identification in the ready-to-view live stream list ([0084], “Referring to the exemplary screen shot of FIG. 8, note the list of recently watched shows 802. More precisely, element 802 shows a filter list with up and down carrots whereon ‘recently watched’ has been selected; the box art icons of the recently watched shows are in a row at the bottom of the screen and discussed further below. Other items that could have been selected on the filter list 802 include ‘favorites,’ ‘sports,’ etc.” [0066], “Content or data normally streamed over the cable modem can be received and distributed by the CPE 106, such as for example packetized video (e.g., IPTV).” [0077], “When the user brings up the application, he or she can scroll back and forth across live channels.” Fig. 8). Regarding claims 12 and 22, Van Handel teaches wherein the live stream content identification comprises a live stream card for displaying at least one of a second image corresponding to the respective live stream content and interaction status information in a respective live stream room, the second image comprising a live stream cover or a preview image ([0084], “The box art icons 806, 810, 812 that show channel numbers work in the usual way (linear channels). The box art icons 808, 814 that show a progress bar are VOD or DVR sessions in accordance with aspects of invention.”). Regarding claim 14, Van Handel teaches an electronic device, comprising: at least one processor; and a memory, communicatively connected with the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores a computer program executable by the at least one processor; and the computer program is executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform a method for playing the live stream content ([0133]-[0135], Fig. 7). The rejection of claim 1 under 35 USC §103 is similarly applied to the remaining limitations of claim 14. Regarding claim 15, Van Handel teaches a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores computer instructions for causing a processor, when executed, to perform a method for playing the live stream content ([0133]-[0135], Fig. 7). The rejection of claim 1 under 35 USC §103 is similarly applied to the remaining limitations of claim 15. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over a combination of Van Handel, Christie et al. (US 2022/0321940), and Radloff et al. (US 2006/0267995). Regarding claim 4, Van Handel teaches the adding the media content identification of the target media content to the ready-to-view live stream list of the user comprises: displaying the ready-to-view live stream list in the preset associated region of the target panel, and displaying the media content identification of the target media content in the ready-to-view live stream list ([0084], “Referring to the exemplary screen shot of FIG. 8, note the list of recently watched shows 802. More precisely, element 802 shows a filter list with up and down carrots whereon ‘recently watched’ has been selected; the box art icons of the recently watched shows are in a row at the bottom of the screen and discussed further below. Other items that could have been selected on the filter list 802 include ‘favorites,’ ‘sports,’ etc.” [0066], “Content or data normally streamed over the cable modem can be received and distributed by the CPE 106, such as for example packetized video (e.g., IPTV).” [0077], “When the user brings up the application, he or she can scroll back and forth across live channels.” Fig. 8). However, Van Handel does not expressly teach wherein the ready-to-view live stream addition operation acts on the addition control displayed in the first panel, the displaying the target panel comprises: if the ready-to-view live stream list of the user is empty, displaying the target panel, wherein the ready-to-view live stream list of the user is not displayed. Christie teaches an addition control displayed in a panel ([0187], “Selection of the My Stuff element 3632 may be selected to add the series and/or episode to the viewer's My Stuff category (as previously discussed).” Fig. 36). In view of Christie’s teaching, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Van Handel wherein the ready-to-view live stream addition operation acts on the addition control displayed in the first panel in order to enable users to proactively choose to add content to a ready-to-view live stream list. The modification would serve to enhance the user experience. The combination teaches the limitations specified above; however, the combination does not expressly teach the displaying the target panel comprises: if the ready-to-view live stream list of the user is empty, displaying the target panel, wherein the ready-to-view live stream list of the user is not displayed. Radloff teaches displaying a panel comprises: if a content list of a user is empty, displaying the panel, wherein the list of the user is not displayed ([0070], “FIG. 4 shows an illustrative screen that may be displayed when the user selects the Set up Playlist button on the No Playlists Set Overlay, selects the Add Icon on the Playlists List, or accesses an existing playlist that contains no programs. The Default Playlist screen shows default information for a playlist when it is empty.” Fig. 4). In view of Radloff’s teaching, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the combination wherein the displaying the target panel comprises: if the ready-to-view live stream list of the user is empty, displaying the target panel, wherein the ready-to-view live stream list of the user is not displayed. The modification would improve the combination by providing a means for assisting users in the utilizing ready-to-view live stream list functionality. Regarding claim 17, the combination teaches the limitations specified above; however, the combination as presently combined does not expressly teach: displaying a third panel, in response to a second interactive operation acting in the media content presentation page, wherein the addition control for the target media content is displayed in the third panel. Christie teaches: displaying a panel, in response to an interactive operation acting in a media content presentation page ([0185], “FIG. 35 illustrates an embodiment where the viewer has now moved the focus to element 3500. As previously noted, each of the elements is further selectable by a viewer. Assuming the viewer now selects element 3500, further information regarding the selected content is displayed.” [0186], “In various embodiments, selection of the element 3500 causes the display of a landing page for the Mad Men television show as shown in FIG. 36.” Figs. 35-36), wherein an addition control for target media content is displayed in the panel ([0187], “Selection of the My Stuff element 3632 may be selected to add the series and/or episode to the viewer's My Stuff category (as previously discussed).” Fig. 36). In view of Christie’s teaching, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify the combination to include displaying a third panel, in response to a second interactive operation acting in the media content presentation page, wherein the addition control for the target media content is displayed in the third panel. The modification would serve to facilitate user access to additional content information and options pertaining to selected content. Claim(s) 5-6, 11, and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over a combination of Van Handel and Christie. Regarding claim 5, Van Handel teaches the displaying the target panel comprises: if the ready-to-view live stream list of the user is not empty, displaying the target panel ([0084], “Referring to the exemplary screen shot of FIG. 8, note the list of recently watched shows 802. More precisely, element 802 shows a filter list with up and down carrots whereon ‘recently watched’ has been selected; the box art icons of the recently watched shows are in a row at the bottom of the screen and discussed further below. Other items that could have been selected on the filter list 802 include ‘favorites,’ ‘sports,’ etc.” Fig. 8), and displaying the ready-to-view live stream list in the preset associated region of the target panel ([0084], “Referring to the exemplary screen shot of FIG. 8, note the list of recently watched shows 802. More precisely, element 802 shows a filter list with up and down carrots whereon ‘recently watched’ has been selected; the box art icons of the recently watched shows are in a row at the bottom of the screen and discussed further below. Other items that could have been selected on the filter list 802 include ‘favorites,’ ‘sports,’ etc.” Fig. 8); the adding the media content identification of the target media content to the ready-to-view live stream list of the user comprises: adding the media content identification for displaying the target media content to the ready-to-view live stream list ([0079], “In one or more embodiments, when the user plays a VOD or DVR asset, the asset is added to the channel surfer's ‘Recently Viewed’ filter at the point where the asset is bookmarked (thus, on a PAUSE or a STOP of the asset). Therefore, the user could be watching a Recorded Show or VOD asset, press PAUSE, tune to a sporting event to catch the live score, then bring up the channel surfer app and press PLAY to automatically resume the ‘Session’ he or she was watching.”). However, Van Handel does not expressly teach wherein the ready-to-view live stream addition operation acts on the addition control displayed in the first panel. Christie teaches an addition control displayed in a panel ([0187], “Selection of the My Stuff element 3632 may be selected to add the series and/or episode to the viewer's My Stuff category (as previously discussed).” Fig. 36). In view of Christie’s teaching, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Van Handel wherein the ready-to-view live stream addition operation acts on the addition control displayed in the first panel. The modification would serve to enhance the user experience. Regarding claims 6 and 18, Van Handel teaches the limitations specified above; however, the combination does not expressly teach displaying a third panel, in response to a second interactive operation acting in the media content presentation page, wherein the addition control for the target media content is displayed in the third panel. Christie teaches: displaying a panel, in response to an interactive operation acting in a media content presentation page ([0185], “FIG. 35 illustrates an embodiment where the viewer has now moved the focus to element 3500. As previously noted, each of the elements is further selectable by a viewer. Assuming the viewer now selects element 3500, further information regarding the selected content is displayed.” [0186], “In various embodiments, selection of the element 3500 causes the display of a landing page for the Mad Men television show as shown in FIG. 36.” Figs. 35-36), wherein an addition control for target media content is displayed in the panel ([0187], “Selection of the My Stuff element 3632 may be selected to add the series and/or episode to the viewer's My Stuff category (as previously discussed).” Fig. 36). In view of Christie’s teaching, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Van Handel to include displaying a third panel, in response to a second interactive operation acting in the media content presentation page, wherein the addition control for the target media content is displayed in the third panel. The modification would serve to facilitate user access to additional content information and options pertaining to selected content. Regarding claim 11, Van Handel teaches the limitations specified above; however, the combination does not expressly teach wherein the live content stream further comprises recommending live stream content; and the recommending live stream content is arranged behind the live stream content corresponding to each live stream content identification in the ready-to-view live stream list. Christie teaches: recommending content ([0163], “As shown in FIG. 20, the side bar 2010 includes multiple elements 2021-2026 that may be highlighted and/or selected by a viewer (e.g., using input via a remote control device). In this example, the displayed elements generally correspond to categories including Favorites 2021, Channel Guide 2022, Friends 2023, Recently Watched 2024. Also shown is a Genius category 2025 that may be selected to provide recommendations based on other content the viewer has watched, liked, purchased, rented, and so on.” Fig. 20); and the recommending live stream content is arranged behind content in a recently-watched list ([0163], “As shown in FIG. 20, the side bar 2010 includes multiple elements 2021-2026 that may be highlighted and/or selected by a viewer (e.g., using input via a remote control device). In this example, the displayed elements generally correspond to categories including Favorites 2021, Channel Guide 2022, Friends 2023, Recently Watched 2024. Also shown is a Genius category 2025 that may be selected to provide recommendations based on other content the viewer has watched, liked, purchased, rented, and so on.” Fig. 20, that is, Genius category 2025 is below Recently Watched 2024). In view of Christie’s teaching, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Van Handel wherein the live content stream further comprises recommending live stream content; and the recommending live stream content is arranged behind the live stream content corresponding to each live stream content identification in the ready-to-view live stream list. The modification would serve to facilitate content discovery for users. The modification would thereby improve the user experience. 5. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over a combination of Van Handel and Amacker (US 2009/0063299). Regarding claim 7, Van Handel teaches the limitations specified above; however, the combination does not expressly teach: in response to the ready-to-view live stream addition operation acting on the addition control displayed in the third panel, controlling a first image in the target media content to move towards a target control, and reducing a displaying size of the first image during the movement, wherein the target control is displayed in the media content presentation page; the target control is configured for triggering the execution of the first interactive operation; and stopping displaying the first image when the first image move to arrive at a preset displaying position of the target control. Amacker teaches: in response to an operation acting on a control displayed in a panel, controlling a first image in target media content to move towards a target control, and reducing a displaying size of the first image during the movement, wherein the target control is displayed in a presentation page; the target control is configured for triggering execution of an operation; and stopping displaying the first image when the first image move to arrive at a preset displaying position of the target control ([0060], “To remove a product from the informal storage space 223, the user may simply drag the reduced-size image of the product off of the product shelf 224 and outside of the informal storage space 223. For example, to remove Book A from the informal storage space 223, the user may drag-and-drop (or drag-and-throw, as discussed above) the reduced-size image 228 of Book A to any region of the web page 312 that is outside of the informal storage space 223, such as the region 340 that is illustrated by dotted lines in FIG. 3. A visual or audible effect may be provided to confirm to the user that the product has been removed from the informal storage space 223.”). In view of Amacker’s teaching, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Van Handel to include, in response to the ready-to-view live stream addition operation acting on the addition control displayed in the third panel, controlling a first image in the target media content to move towards a target control, and reducing a displaying size of the first image during the movement, wherein the target control is displayed in the media content presentation page; the target control is configured for triggering the execution of the first interactive operation; and stopping displaying the first image when the first image move to arrive at a preset displaying position of the target control. The modification would serve to facilitate user removal of content items from the user interface. The modification would serve to enhance the user experience. Claim(s) 8 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over a combination of Van Handel and Bernstein et al. (US 2016/0277802). Regarding claims 8 and 19, Van Handel teaches the limitations specified above; however, the combination does not expressly teach wherein the ready-to-view live stream list is configured for displaying the live stream content identification of the live stream content that has not ended ([0084], “Referring to the exemplary screen shot of FIG. 8, note the list of recently watched shows 802. More precisely, element 802 shows a filter list with up and down carrots whereon ‘recently watched’ has been selected; the box art icons of the recently watched shows are in a row at the bottom of the screen and discussed further below. Other items that could have been selected on the filter list 802 include ‘favorites,’ ‘sports,’ etc.” [0066], “Content or data normally streamed over the cable modem can be received and distributed by the CPE 106, such as for example packetized video (e.g., IPTV).” [0077], “When the user brings up the application, he or she can scroll back and forth across live channels.” Fig. 8). However, Van Handel does not expressly teach for each live stream content identification in the ready-to-view live stream list, when the live stream of current live stream content corresponding to a current live stream content identification has ended, removing the current live stream content identification from the ready-to-view live stream list; and when a host of the current live stream content restarts a live stream, re-adding the current live stream content identification to the ready-to-view live stream list, or not re-adding the current live stream content identification to the ready-to-view live stream list. Bernstein teaches: for each live stream content identification in a stream list, when a live stream of current live stream content corresponding to a current live stream content identification has ended, removing the current live stream content identification from the stream list ([0085], “When the broadcaster ends the video stream the system may remove the broadcast from the global list (755).”); and when a host of the current live stream content starts a live stream, adding the current live stream content identification to the ready-to-view live stream list ([0066], “The video streams in area 405 may be from a global list of in-progress video streams, for example at a social media server such as server 160 of FIG. 1. The server may select the in-progress video streams because the user is following the broadcaster or because the video streams relate to an interest of the user.”). In view of Bernstein’s teaching, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Van Handel to include, when the live stream of current live stream content corresponding to a current live stream content identification has ended, removing the current live stream content identification from the ready-to-view live stream list; and when a host of the current live stream content restarts a live stream, re-adding the current live stream content identification to the ready-to-view live stream list, or not re-adding the current live stream content identification to the ready-to-view live stream list. The modification would serve to facilitate user navigation and discovery of content for viewing. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Ellis (US 2002/0059610) discloses a system and method wherein programs may be added by the user to the watch lists at any time, or may be automatically added or removed by the interactive television application based on user preference profiles and reminder lists (Abstract). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL R TELAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5940. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nasser Goodarzi can be reached at (571) 272-4195. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL R TELAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2426
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 10, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604066
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING NOTIFICATION INTERFACES BASED ON MEDIA BROADCAST ACCESS EVENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598361
VIDEO OPTIMIZATION PROXY SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598352
VIDEO PRESENTATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581137
VIDEO MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR VIDEO FILES AND LIVE STREAMING CONTENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12549801
LYRIC VIDEO DISPLAY METHOD AND DEVICE, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
42%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (+27.0%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 417 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month