Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/993,575

WEARABLE AND AUTOMATED ULTRASOUND THERAPY DEVICES AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 12, 2025
Priority
Jul 12, 2022 — EU PCT/EP2022/069521 +5 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC
Art Unit
3797
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Cortery AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
412 granted / 783 resolved
-17.4% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+40.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
837
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
85.2%
+45.2% vs TC avg
§102
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 783 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 47 and 49-71 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Limitation “train a machine learning model based on the generated features to optimize ultrasound therapy parameters using unsupervised or supervised machine learning methods, wherein the ultrasound therapy parameters are optimized to increase a likelihood of achieving a shockwave therapeutic effect comprising angiogenesis and neovascularization” is not sufficiently disclose in the specification. The specification does not sufficiently disclose what features are extracted and how using these features would optimized ultrasound therapy parameters to increase a likelihood of achieving a shockwave therapeutic effect comprising angiogenesis and neovascularization. For example, does one need to increase pulsing frequency to increase a likelihood of achieving a shockwave therapeutic effect comprising angiogenesis and neovascularization? How much to increase the frequency? What parameter need to optimized and by how much? How does one determine which parameter to optimizer? There no explanation on what features is extracted. There also no explanation or example on what parameter need to optimize and base on what reason is optimize that parameter would result in an increase of a likelihood of achieving a shockwave therapeutic effect comprising angiogenesis and neovascularization? The specification only provides a vague description of using machine learning with data such as a cardiac function, quality of life and angiogenesis, patient information data comprising demographic and medical history data of patients and ultrasound therapy parameter data comprising one or more of pulsing frequency, pulse train frequency, number of treated spots, duration and treatment zone area to optimize ultrasound therapy parameters using unsupervised or supervised machine learning methods. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 47, 49-56 and 58-71 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Limitation “wherein the ultrasound therapy parameters are optimized to increase a likelihood of achieving a shockwave therapeutic effect comprising angiogenesis and neovascularization” is unclear because applicant does not provide a mete and bound for ultrasound therapy parameters. Ultrasound therapy parameters could be a lot of things such as treatment duration, amplitude, intensity, frequency, duty cycle, etc. The claim discloses ultrasound therapy parameter data comprising one or more of pulsing frequency, pulse train frequency, number of treated spots, duration and treatment zone area. It is unclear if ultrasound therapy parameters and ultrasound therapy parameter data are the same and ultrasound therapy parameters are limit to pulsing frequency, pulse train frequency, number of treated spots, duration and treatment zone area. No art rejection The closest prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 12,119,102; US 2023/0343434; US 2023/0317283; US 2023/0298709; US 2023/0200811; US 2023/0100912; US 2021/0074432; US 2020/0269073; US 2019/0027252 and US 2017/0312165. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HIEN NGOC NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7031. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:30am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anne Kozak can be reached at 571-270-0552. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HIEN N NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3797
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 12, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678638
TARGETED NEUROMODULATION TO IMPROVE NEUROPSYCHIATRIC FUNCTION
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678063
PULSE WAVE ESTIMATING DEVICE AND PULSE WAVE ESTIMATION METHOD
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673154
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TREATMENT OF INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGES
5y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12661013
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR IN VIVO FLOW CYTOMETRY USING THE DETECTION OF PHOTOACOUSTIC WAVES
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12642439
Method for Measuring Pre-Ejection Period
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+40.1%)
3y 11m (~2y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 783 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month