Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/994,024

DISPLAY SUBSTRATE, METHOD FOR DRIVING THE SAME AND DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 13, 2025
Priority
Nov 13, 2023 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2023131251
Examiner
GIESY, ADAM
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
690 granted / 848 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
862
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§103
34.6%
-5.4% vs TC avg
§102
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 848 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5, 6, 8, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Kim (US Doc. No. 20230157073). Regarding claim 1, Kim discloses a display substrate (see Figure 1), comprising: a base substrate (Figure 7, ‘SUB’), and power supply lines (Figure 2, VDD), data lines (‘DLj’) and a plurality of sub-pixels that are arranged on the base substrate, wherein the sub-pixel comprises a sub-pixel driving circuit (PX) and a light-emitting element coupled to each other (LD), and the sub-pixel driving circuit comprises a driving transistor (T1), a data writing transistor (T2), a first capacitor (C1) and a second capacitor (C2); a first plate of the first capacitor is coupled to a gate electrode of the driving transistor (as shown in Figure 2 – note that the first plate of C1 is connected to the gate of T1), a second plate of the first capacitor is coupled to a second electrode of the data writing transistor (as shown in Figure 2 – note that the second plate of C1 connected to T2), and a first electrode of the data writing transistor is coupled to a corresponding one of the data lines (as shown in Figure 2 – note that T2 is also connected to DLj); a first plate of the second capacitor is coupled to the second plate of the first capacitor (note that one leg of C1 is connected to one leg of C2), and a second plate of the second capacitor is coupled to a corresponding one of the power supply lines (note that the other leg of C2 is connected to VDD); among sub-pixel driving circuits located in a same row along a first direction, second plates of second capacitors comprised in the sub-pixel driving circuits are arranged in sequence along the first direction, there is a spacing region between second plates of adjacent second capacitors and an orthographic projection of the data line onto the base substrate at least partially overlaps an orthographic projection of the spacing region onto the base substrate (as shown in Figure 6A – note that both plates of C2 [C2_E1 and C2_E2] are spaced apart and can be considered a ‘spacing region’ as applicable to the current terminology – note that the data lines DL do not overlap any portion of the second capacitor). Regarding claim 5, Kim discloses all of the limitations of claim 1 as discussed in the claim 1 rejection above and further that the display substrate further comprises a plurality of first reference signal connection lines (Figure 2, VREF) and a plurality of second reference signal connection lines (Vbs), and the first reference signal connection lines and the second reference signal connection lines are alternately arranged along the first direction (as shown in Figure 6A); an orthographic projection of at least portion of the data line onto the base substrate is located between orthographic projections of the first reference signal connection line and the second reference signal connection line that are adjacent onto the base substrate (see paragraph 0211); the data line and the first reference signal connection line are arranged in different layers (see paragraph 0209); and/or the data line and the second reference signal connection line are arranged in different layers (see alternative form rejected above). Regarding claim 6, Kim discloses all of the limitations of claim 5 as discussed in the claim 5 rejection above and further that the display substrate further comprises a plurality of first reference signal lines; the sub-pixel driving circuit further comprises a second reset transistor, a first electrode of the second reset transistor is coupled to a corresponding one of the first reference signal lines, and a second electrode of the second reset transistor is coupled to the second plate of the first capacitor; and the first reference signal connection lines are respectively coupled to the plurality of first reference signal lines (see Figure 2, elements T5 and VREF). Regarding claim 8, Kim discloses all of the limitations of claim 5 as discussed in the claim 5 rejection above and further that the display substrate further comprises a plurality of first initialization signal connection lines and a plurality of second initialization signal connection lines, and the first initialization signal connection lines and the second initialization signal connection lines are alternately arranged along the first direction (see Figure 2, elements Vinit and Vaint; see also Figure 6E, elements VL_int and VL_aint); an orthographic projection of at least portion of the data line onto the base substrate is located between orthographic projections of a first initialization signal connection line and a second initialization signal connection line that are adjacent onto the base substrate, the data line and the first initialization signal connection line are arranged in different layers(see paragraph 0211 – note that data lines DL may extend in direction DR2; see also Figure 6F – note that the data line and the first/second initialization lines are alternated); and/or, the data line and the second initialization signal connection line are arranged in different layers (see paragraph 0209 – note VL_int and VL_aint are on a different layer than data line DL [which is on layer SD2]). Regarding claim 20, Kim discloses a display device (see Figure 1), comprising the display substrate according to claim 1 (see rejection of claim 1 above). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-4, 7, 9-15, 17, 19, and 21-22 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ADAM R GIESY whose telephone number is (571)272-7555. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at 5712727603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ADAM R. GIESY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 13, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12761758
TOUCH SENSING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ASSEMBLY
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12743149
MIXED REALITY DEVICE, PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745528
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730497
INTERACTIVE ENERGY EFFECT ATTRACTION
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12694711
CROSS-DEVICE COMMUNICATION WITH ADAPTIVE AVATAR INTERACTION
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.3%)
2y 6m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 848 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month