Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/994,170

Frame Rate Control Method and Related Apparatus

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Examiner
LIN, CHUN-NAN
Art Unit
2629
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Honor Device Co., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
563 granted / 648 resolved
+24.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
665
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§112
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 648 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 preamble recites “An electronic device ….”. It appears claim 13 is an apparatus claim. Claim 13 recites “perform operation comprising: receiving ….. starting ….; during running ….; ….”. Claim language appears like method steps. Claim 13 recites both apparatus and method claim. A single claim that claims both an apparatus and the method steps of using the apparatus is indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112(b). See MPEP 2173.05(p). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see remark, filed 1/29/2026, with respect to claims 1 – 8, have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of previous action has been withdrawn. However, claim 13 has 35 USC 112(b) issue. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 – 8 are allowed. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHUN-NAN LIN whose telephone number is (571)272-5646. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:30am - 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin C Lee can be reached at 571-2722963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHUN-NAN LIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 14, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602116
LOW ACOUSTIC MOUSE SCROLL WHEEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598245
HID SYSTEM AND DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD USING THE HID SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596458
CAPACITIVE ELECTRONIC PEN INCLUDING DETACHABLE AXIAL CORE BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585340
Tracking a Paired Peripheral Input Device based on a Contact Criterion
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585360
PHOTO-SENSING ENABLED DISPLAY FOR TOUCH DETECTION WITH CUSTOMIZED PHOTODIODE AND LIGHT EMITTING DIODE COMPONENT LEVEL ANGULAR RESPONSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.7%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 648 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month