Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/994,493

HOSE FOR HEATING A FLUID AND HOSE ARRANGEMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Priority
Jul 14, 2022 — DE 10 2022 117 668.1 +1 more
Examiner
NGO, HUNG V
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Eichenauer GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
780 granted / 961 resolved
+13.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -35% lift
Without
With
+-34.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
980
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
55.9%
+15.9% vs TC avg
§102
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 961 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. A broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, claim 9 recites the broad recitation a connection device, and the claim also recites in particular coupled to the free end area in fluid tight manner in particular an end nozzle formed for outputting the fluid into the environment is arranged which is the narrower statement of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Claim 9 is not considered over the prior art because of 35 U.S.C. 112 problems. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 4, 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Etscheid (EP 3092433). Re claim 1, Etsheid discloses a hose for heating a fluid (3) comprising: a cavity (100) through which the fluid is conveyable; and a heating device (2), which includes at least two electrodes (25, 26) configured to input electrical energy into an electrically conductive plastic material (27) of the heating device in a heating operation of the heating device, and wherein the heating device at least partially surrounds the cavity in a circumferential direction (Fig 2), and wherein at least the heating device has a contour in cross-section that is different from a rotationally symmetrical contour (Fig 9). Re claim 3, wherein the electrodes are arranged symmetrically in the plastic material with respect to at least one plane of symmetry, which includes a central axis (vertical axis) of the hose (Fig 9). Re claim 4, wherein the hose comprises at least one passage opening via which the fluid is conveyable out of the cavity into an environment of the house in operation of the hose (Fig 12), Re claim 15, wherein the at least one passage opening has a round cross section in lateral direction (Fig 12). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Etscheid (EP 3092433) in view of Damberg (DE 20 2015 105640). The teaching as discussed above does not disclose the heating device has a contour rectangular cross-section and wherein a respective electrode arranged in four corner areas of the heating device Damberg teaches a heating device (abstract) has a contour rectangular cross-section and wherein a respective electrode (8, 9) arranged in four corner areas of the heating device (Figs 1-3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide additional electrode with the heating device of Etscheid for providing even heating. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Etscheid (EP 3092433). The teaching as discussed above does not disclose wherein the electrodes are ribbon shaped. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the electrodes of Etscheid by employing a ribbon shape for intended use, since more than a mere change of form is necessary for patentability. In re Span-Deck Inc. v. Fab-Con, Inc. (CA 8, 1982) 215 USPQ 835. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8, 10-11, 16-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 12-13 are allowed. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUNG V NGO whose telephone number is (571)272-1979. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5:30 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Imani Hayman can be reached at (571) 270-5528. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUNG V NGO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 14, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772427
COMMUNICATION LINE
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12767069
ROUTING STRUCTURE
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12764917
ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE SHIELDING MATERIAL, ELECTRONIC COMPONENT, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, AND USING METHOD FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE SHIELDING MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12755870
FLAMMABLE CABLE AND CONTROL LINE ENCAPSULATOR
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12755867
RECEPTION CABLE AND MEDICAL IMAGE DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (-34.8%)
2y 2m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 961 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month