Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/994,686

OPTICAL TRANSMISSION LINE, OPTICAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF CONNECTING OPTICAL TRANSMISSION LINES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 15, 2025
Priority
Jul 28, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022029167
Examiner
LIU, LI
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Yasuhiro Koike
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1399 granted / 1736 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
1752
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1736 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 1/15/2025 and 7/17/2026 are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. 1). Claim 1, and thus depending claims 2-18 and 20, recite the limitations “when a product of a scattering loss of the optical signal and a length is 6 dB or less and a Gaussian beam emitted from a single-mode optical fiber is input by center excitation, the first optical transmission line performs output while enlarging a beam diameter by three times or more, and in the connection portion, the first optical transmission line and the second optical transmission line are optically connected via a gap”. It is not clear which component’s length the “a length” in the phrase “a product of a scattering loss of the optical signal and a length” refer to. Does the “a length” refer to a length of the first optical transmission line, or does the “a length” refer to a length of the second optical transmission line? Does the “a length” refer to a length of the single-mode optical fiber? Does the “a length” refer to a length of the gap? Does the “a length” refer to a length of the connection portion? Does the “a length” refer to a partial length of one of the first optical transmission line, the second optical transmission line, or single-mode fiber? Regarding the limitation “the first optical transmission line performs output while enlarging a beam diameter by three times or more”, it is not clear whether the “a beam diameter” refers to the beam diameter of the Gaussian beam, or one of any other beam diameters of beams transmitted in the first optical transmission line, the second optical transmission line, or the connection portion. 2). Claim 19 recites the limitations “when a product of a scattering loss of the optical signal and a length is 6 dB or less and a Gaussian beam emitted from a single-mode optical fiber is input by center excitation, performing output while enlarging a beam diameter by three times or more; and optically connecting the first optical transmission line with the second optical transmission line via a gap”. It is not clear which component’s length the “a length” in the phrase “a product of a scattering loss of the optical signal and a length” refer to. Does the “a length” refer to a length of the first optical transmission line, or does the “a length” refer to a length of the second optical transmission line? Does the “a length” refer to a length of the single-mode optical fiber? Does the “a length” refer to a length of the gap? Does the “a length” refer to a length of the connection portion? Does the “a length” refer to a partial length of one of the first optical transmission line, the second optical transmission line, or single-mode fiber? Regarding the limitation “performing output while enlarging a beam diameter by three times or more”, it is not clear whether the “a beam diameter” refers to the beam diameter of the Gaussian beam, or one of any other beam diameters of beams transmitted in the first optical transmission line, the second optical transmission line, or the connection portion. (Note: MPEP § 2173.02(I) indicates “if the language of a claim, given its broadest reasonable interpretation, is such that a person of ordinary skill in the relevant art would read it with more than one reasonable interpretation, then a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph is appropriate. … . ..., a genus claim that could be interpreted in such a way that it is not clear which species are covered would be indefinite (e.g., because there is more than one reasonable interpretation of what species are included in the claim)”). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20240195503 A1 US 20230003950 A1 US 20230098573 A1 US 20200264365 A1 US 20190041586 A1 US 20180335573 A1 JP 2001228353 JP H0429104 A Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LI LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-1084. The examiner can normally be reached 9 am - 8 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Vanderpuye can be reached at (571)272-3078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LI LIU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2634
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 15, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700926
Optical Communication System with a Simplified Remote Optical Power Supply
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695506
ALTERING REFRACTIVE INDEX OF AN EXPANDED BEAM CONNECTOR LENS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12676675
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND OPTICAL BUS NETWORK
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665673
PARALLEL MICROLED-BASED FREE SPACE OPTICAL INTERCONNECTS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659029
WAVEGUIDE ESTIMATION APPARATUS, WAVEGUIDE ESTIMATION METHOD AND PROGRAM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+16.5%)
2y 7m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1736 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month